You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
Senate rejects border fence
2013-06-19
Senators on Tuesday rejected building the 700 miles of double-tier border fencing Congress authorized just seven years ago, with a majority of the Senate saying they didnÂ’t want to delay granting illegal immigrants legal status while the fence was being built.

The 54-39 vote to reject the fence shows the core of the immigration deal is holding. The vote broke mostly along party lines, though five Republicans, including Sen. Marco Rubio and the rest of the billÂ’s authors, voted against the fence, and two Democrats voted for it.
McCain voted against, but in 2008 he called for the fence to be completed as he campaigned for the Presidency...
Republicans had offered the fence as a way to build the confidence of voters skeptical that the government will enforce its laws, but opponents said building more fencing is costly, would take too long, and shouldnÂ’t be dictated by Washington.

“I think we should leave that to the best judgment of the Border Patrol,” said Sen. John McCain, one of the eight senators who wrote the immigration bill.
Unless they want it...
Sen. John Thune, South Dakota Republican, proposed the border fence amendment, which would have prevented the administration from granting any illegal immigrants legal status under the bill until at least 350 miles of double-tier fencing has been erected, and would withhold full citizenship rights until 700 total miles have been built.
What this says is that the Democrats have won the debate in the Senate. For whatever reason, there will be no delays in legalizing the eleven million plus illegal immigrants in our country and no checks on millions more coming in.
Minutes after the border fence, senators also voted to weaken current law that requires the government to have biometric checks such as fingerprints or eye-scans for every visitor to the U.S. — a recommendation of the 9/11 commission that looked into the terrorist attacks on Washington and New York.
So they're truly for open borders, security be damned...
Senators said it is too expensive to check fingerprints at all air, land and sea ports of entry.
What have we been spending $3 trillion a year plus on then?
Instead, the bill calls for photographic checks at air and sea ports, but excludes land ports.

“When is our federal government going to keep its promises when it comes to the issue of border security?” said Mr. Thune, the sponsor of the fence proposal.

Mr. Rubio said he supports building a border fence, and pointed to $1.5 billion included in his bill for more infrastructure, which he said will go to a fence plan. Mr. Rubio said Mr. Thune’s amendment didn’t lay out the details for “a specific border plan.”
Rubio doesn't have a plan, either, and he doesn't have any threshold for a border fence. He's for open borders even as he says he isn't.
“Therefore, I will oppose his amendment and instead continue to work with my Republican colleagues to arrive at a new measure that improves on the significant border security measures already in the bill,” the Florida Republican siad.
One that says nothing but lets him campaign for the Presidency...
The border now has 651 miles of barriers, but only 36 miles are at least double-tier fencing. Another 316 miles are single-tier pedestrian fencing, and the rest — 299 miles — are vehicle barriers that still allow wildlife, and people, to cross.
Posted by:Steve White

#9  Easy on, easy off. Screw Rubio. Next!
Posted by: KBK   2013-06-19 18:39  

#8  Wonder what would happen if a bill was introduced to protect the endangered species alligator arizonisis, using green energy to power the maintenance.
Posted by: swksvolFF   2013-06-19 17:21  

#7  Talk about your meteoric career path... I don't know WTF he was thinking.
Posted by: Shipman   2013-06-19 16:02  

#6  I left a rather caustic email at Rubio's site, telling him that his traitorous participation as McCain's and Schumer boy has made him unfit for national office...well, I said more than that, but this is a family site
Posted by: Frank G   2013-06-19 11:11  

#5  The sale out is obvious.

Push to annex Mexico. Solves the citizenship issue. They'll get a lot more Hispanic voters in the elections, unfortunately, mostly for PRI rather than Donk.
Posted by: Procopius2k    2013-06-19 10:01  

#4  but opponents said building more fencing is costly, would take too long, and shouldnÂ’t be dictated by Washington.

So if, for example Arizona wanted to erect a fence... or require proof of citizenship to vote it'll be ok - right?
Didn't think so...

Senators said it is too expensive to check fingerprints at all air, land and sea ports of entry.

They spent it all on getting naked pictures of your granny...
Posted by: CrazyFool   2013-06-19 08:44  

#3  Your political classes are selling you out too.

Higher Rents and lower wages are good for them, not for you and your children.
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2013-06-19 08:22  

#2  But we still have to take off our shoes and belts at the airport; will these newly arrived illegals have to or is that racist?
fun meter is rapidly approaching the peg....
Posted by: USN, Ret.   2013-06-19 00:38  

#1  By most accounts, 11.0Milyuhn illegals is conservative + subjective estimate, wid the actual number likely to be times higher.

* IIRC STARS-N-STRIPES > US SENATORS: IMMIGRATION REFORM BILL KEY FOR GOP IN 2016.

* RELATED CNN > BOEHNER: NO WAY TO GET IMMIGRATION BILL TO HOUSE FLOOR WIDOUT MAJORITY GOP SUPPORT.

* NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO > CBO: 8.0MILYUHN TO GAIN LEGAL STATUS IN BUDGET BILL.

Most of the above illegals are more likely than not to vote Democrat anyway, so IMO the GOP-Right gains little or nothing by voting "safe" wid the Democrats as opposed to a dedicated Conservative platform.

The Democrats or DemoLeft are out to ensure the GOP is destroyed as a political force + movement in "Globalist" OWG Amerika + Washington 2020-2025.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2013-06-19 00:25  

00:00