You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Government
120+ US Representatives to Army: Reverse Abrams tank plans
2013-06-01
More than 120 U.S. lawmakers are urging Army brass to reverse a plan under which the service would stop buying Abrams tanks for three years. The collection of Republican and Democratic House members "are deeply concerned to learn that the Army has once again failed to fund production of the [Abrams] tank," they wrote in a May 21 letter to Army Secretary John McHugh.

"This decision neglects the Army's responsibility to modernize the National Guard units, and undervalues the damaging impact to the highly specialized industrial base that supports the program," states the letter.

Under a years-old plan, the Army intends to suspend buying upgraded Abrams tanks in 2016, a freeze that would last until 2019. The service wants to use the savings for other priorities, and believes sales to other nations will keep the production line running. Industry officials and lawmakers with a stake in the program aren't so sure that's the best idea.
Here's a dumb question: do we need more? We have the occasional loss during operations in Iraq, very occasional loss elsewhere, and training losses which should be very occasional indeed. I'm told the Lima plant does a great job of rebuilding them when they need it. If we don't need any more then this is just 'pork' dressed up as 'national security'...
Industry officials and lawmakers are worried that without sustained U.S. Army buys, General Dynamics would be forced to shutter the Lima, Ohio-based production line. Because highly skilled, specially trained workers would likely have to find work elsewhere, stakeholders worry about the cost of restarting the line as US defense budgets are shrinking. They often talk of a worst-case scenario under which the tank plant would never reopen. In addition to Ohio, work is conducted on the Abrams program in Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Florida, according to an Army fact sheet.

The Abrams program shows how the U.S. military services and industry have become experts at spreading work on major weapon programs across the country, and thereby locking in the support of sizable numbers in Congress.

Congressional sources and analysts often say the ground service is counting on lawmakers to come up with the funds to keep American tanks rolling off the Lima line. However, that could prove difficult for 2014 since defense budget caps are in place and the 2014 Pentagon budget now would have to be cut by around $50 billion unless sequestration is addressed before Oct. 1.

Posted by:Pappy

#4  Hybrid ready to go...

Posted by: Jiggs Snavitch1005   2013-06-01 11:20  

#3  No worries mon; in 2016 we'll have the hybrid M-2 Green Lanyard.
Posted by: swksvolFF   2013-06-01 11:14  

#2  I'd like one if they'd bring the price down to Prius levels.
Posted by: Shipman   2013-06-01 11:07  

#1  Let's see...tanks that are not needed, OR feeding fielded Marines.
Posted by: Skidmark   2013-06-01 04:25  

00:00