You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Rand Paul Goes Nuclear on "Spectacle" Hearing on Apple's Taxes
2013-05-21
Posted by:tipper

#6  Retained earnings (hording financial resources) are in fact tightly regulated by the IRS code. Apple Inc. retained earnings statement proves Apple is well within current IRS upper and lower limits. An endless argument (beyond the scope of this article) could, and has been had, as to the costs and benifits of what those limits should be. Which ever side of the argument each investor falls will depend on his own personal time-value-of-money.

Rand Paul's most valid point is that instead of castigating corporations simply because they are profitable, an actual win - win tax solution needs to be implemented which actually gives corporations incentive to grow and invest profits inside U.S. borders instead of in foreign countrys with lower corporation taxes.
Posted by: junkiron   2013-05-21 20:27  

#5  let me amend that - end of problem for citizens. start of employment problem for tax lawyers, IRS agents/bureaucrats, and CPAs,
Posted by: OldSpook   2013-05-21 19:15  

#4  Consumption tax (pay when you buy, rich spend more so will pay more, and that includes illegal or illicit income being spent). Flat tax (pay when you have over the poverty limit - no withholding, you have to write a check every quarter, just like businesses do). End of problem.
Posted by: OldSpook   2013-05-21 19:13  

#3  
Rand Paul had the guts to stand up and give what (in my opinion) should have been Mitt RomneyÂ’s first Presidential Campaign speech.
Posted by: junkiron   2013-05-21 18:16  

#2  I'd agree with him and you more if I didn't suspect Apple of working to maximize _my_ taxes...
Posted by: Thing From Snowy Mountain   2013-05-21 17:38  

#1  ..again I'll make the point about hording financial resources that should have distributed to the shareholders. The usual hypocrisy of pols that wrote and passed favorable legislation that permitted this but now want a front stage position to denounce Apple is just showbiz [which is what Washington is for ugly people].
Posted by: Procopius2k   2013-05-21 14:04  

00:00