Submit your comments on this article |
-Short Attention Span Theater- |
Lingerie firm launches women's underwear for men |
2013-04-29 |
![]() Because what's more masculine than wanting to dress up in ladies' underwear? HommeMystere are hoping their new range of lingerie for males, which includes thongs and padded bras, will change the landscape of men's underwear. I guess it'll help distinguish one kinda guy from the other. The Australian firm said their under garments include 'comfortable men's panties that really do fit, bra straps that don't fall off the shoulder, teddies that don't ride up halfway through the night and quality soft fabrics that feel great for all day wear'. Cotton and that sort of stuff doesn't make it, of course. The label already has a UK seller so men this side of the world can look forward to more 'enjoyable' pants. That statement results from a misreading of the diffo, if any, between men and women. Women wear 'enjoyable' pants, sometimes changing three or four times in the course of a day. Men wear pants to keep drafts off the wedding tackle and to avoid being arrested. And the company are keen to stress the garments are not just for gay men. No, no! Certainly not! Your average construction worker or CPA wants nothing so much as to go home at night, have a long bubble bath, and put on a nice teddie. They added: 'We provide our lingerie for guys. We are not concerned if you are gay, straight, vegetarian, republican, anglican, martian or any other persuasion. "They money's the important thing to us!" 'We just design and manufacture attractive luxury underwear for men.' "And you're never going to hear from us again." |
Posted by:Fred |
#7 Adam Smith was into Comparative Advantage. In the spirit of research I found this What Katie Did it looks a lot better than banana hammock basques. |
Posted by: Bright Pebbles 2013-04-29 13:38 |
#6 Why do I need a thong when I could just wear a jock strap? |
Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305 2013-04-29 13:33 |
#5 If it's made for men, will the fetishists want to wear it? Isn't the point that they're wearing clothes made for the wrong gender? |
Posted by: Rob Crawford 2013-04-29 13:09 |
#4 No-one's being harmed here. I take it Adam Smith was into petticoats. /there's that damn impertinence again. |
Posted by: Pappy 2013-04-29 13:03 |
#3 20 days remaining on Ebay. |
Posted by: Besoeker 2013-04-29 12:04 |
#2 >"They money's the important thing to us!" You said that like it's a bad thing!? No-one's being harmed here. |
Posted by: Bright Pebbles 2013-04-29 10:57 |
#1 ... |
Posted by: DarthVader 2013-04-29 10:28 |