Submit your comments on this article |
China-Japan-Koreas |
U.S. 'Fully Capable' of Defending against N. Korea Threat |
2013-03-08 |
[An Nahar] The United States said Thursday it was "fully capable" of defending itself and its allies against any ![]() The U.S. military could deal with any such attack, U.S. officials said, repeating earlier warnings that North Korea would gain nothing by provocations, while stressing they took its threats seriously. "I can tell you that the United States is fully capable of defending against any North Korean ballistic missile attack," said White House front man Jay Carney. "Our recent success in returning to testing of the upgraded version of the so-called GBI or the CE-II missile will keep us on a good trajectory to improve our defense capability against limited ballistic missile threats." Before the U.N. Security Council voted to impose tough new sanctions on North Korea over its February 12 nuclear test, Pyongyang earlier threatened a "pre-emptive" nuclear strike against the United States. State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland said Washington was taking the threats seriously, but "extreme rhetoric has not been unusual for this regime." "You have to take a government at its word when it makes these kinds of threats, which is why we are making clear that we have not only full defensive capability for the United States but that we're prepared to defend our allies," she added. Nuland also urged Pyongyang to give up a threat to scrap the 1953 armistice agreement that ended the Korean War. North Korea announced on Tuesday that it would "completely declare invalid" the agreement from March 11 in response to tougher U.N. sanctions, theoretically removing the only barrier to a resumption of full hostilities. Nuland refused to say whether that would leave the U.S. technically at war again with North Korea. "There are obviously legal procedures and ways that this would have to actually be implemented if the DPRK were looking to pull out of it," she said, referring to the North's official name. She stressed, though, that "this armistice has been one of the underpinnings of peace and security on the Korean Peninsula, so we would obviously urge that this not be the direction that we go." Korean War Timeline: June 25, 1950: North Korea crosses the 38th Parallel, invading South Korea. June 26, 1950: North Korea's tanks reach the outskirts of Seoul. June 27, 1950: Truman commits US Naval and Air support to South Korea. June 30, 1950: Truman and advisers agree to give MacArthur 2 divisions. July 2, 1950: NKPA (North Korean People's Army) takes Suwon. September 15, 1950: With US/UN/ROK forces pushed back nearly to the end of the Korean peninsula, MacArthur launches the Inchon Invasion. September 27, 1950: Walker's Eighth Army makes contact with X Corps. MacArthur gives OK for US forces to cross the 38th Parallel. October 9, 1950: US Army crosses 38TH Parallel near Kaesong. October 19, 1950: US forces occupy Pyongyang October 24, 1950: MacArthur orders his troops into Korea's northernmost provinces. November 1, 1950: First US vs. Communist Chinese fighting at Unsan |
Posted by:Fred |
#13 Yosemite Sam is the narciso of Rantburg. |
Posted by: Jack is Back! 2013-03-08 16:52 |
#12 Makes me think of this... |
Posted by: Yosemite Sam 2013-03-08 15:29 |
#11 It's always this way, Bill Clinton. Look at FDR's limp wristed approach to Hitler in the 1930's. Everybody knew that Hitler was violating the treaties that ended WWI but nobody (except Churchill) said anything about it. So instead of slapping Hitler down in 1933 or '34 we waited until it became WWII, the Russian front, Pearl Harbor and the Holocaust. We never seem to learn that people like Pudgy and his Chinese puppet masters never stop pushing until somebody pushes back. The danger now is that we have waited too long, the Chinese have gotten stronger and we have gotten weaker. Yesterday I suggested that we nuke Pudgy. Maybe that's rash. Maybe carpet bombing Pyongyang and the NORK nuke sites would be better. I'll leave that for the generals. But I doubt that our current POTUS has the gravitas or the international support to pull off such an attack. Almost certainly he lacks the will. This is very dangerous and only goes to show what a mistake the American people made when they elected Obama. Sanctions won't work. They never have. No matter what they say in the UN the Chinese will continue to support their little lap dog. I do believe it is time to demonstrate to the NORKS and the Chinese that we will push back when they've gone too far and I believe they have now gone too far. For a little prick like Pudgy to threaten my country with a nuclear attack is going too far. If he was waving a pistol around on a street and making statements like that I would certainly want to shoot him first instead of attempting to find out whether or not his pistol was loaded. Why take chances? It is time to smack him back. It won't get any easier if we wait. |
Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305 2013-03-08 14:57 |
#10 Lest we forget, it was the UN that forbid us from bombing or attacking Manchuria when the ChiComs had 1.5 million guys camping in the freaking open along the Yalu River. We could have ended all of this crap in 1950 if Truman and the UN had the stomach to put an end to it right then. We're still fighting the Korean War...not slapping down China in 50 gave them carte blanche to do what ever they wanted in Asia, Viet Nam, Cambodia, Laos, the crap in Burma ALL was an off shoot of our faint hearted actions in Korea. Two divisions? we should have brought the entire weight of the world down on the Norks in 50 and let everyone know we were not ever going to mess around with their behavior. Same for today, Clinton's sissiness with terrorism has put us in the constant brush fire fighting we do today. We are up to our butt in all of this because we enable it when we do not use our POWER. These people only respect POWER. And if we have a nuke attack from Iran, blame Nork, if we have one from Nork, you can thank the IAEA's limp-dicked approach to ending nuclear proliferation. |
Posted by: Bill Clinton 2013-03-08 12:48 |
#9 Defend? I think we should ATTACK, just carpet bomb the crap out of the presidential compound and the suburbs where the elites and the military nobility live and then sit back and watch what happens. You cut the head off this mess and the peasants would be more than willing to accept another form of government. I also seriously doubt if ALL of the military are raring to go to preserve the atrocities of the government. |
Posted by: Bill Clinton 2013-03-08 12:40 |
#8 The spring Kimchee, Joe. |
Posted by: Skidmark 2013-03-08 09:23 |
#7 An army of lions commanded by a deer will never be an army of lions. - Napoleon |
Posted by: Procopius2k 2013-03-08 08:18 |
#6 do we currently have AEGIS ships near NKor? if we do, are they operational? will Obama bring them home as an anti sequester gimmick? |
Posted by: lord garth 2013-03-08 07:03 |
#5 I notice there is no mention of retaliation. |
Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2013-03-08 03:47 |
#4 BREAKING NEWS > SOUTH KOREA: "IFF DPRK ATTACKS WID NUCLEAR WEAPONS, THE KIM JONG-UN REGIME WILL BECOME EXTINCT". Keep your fingers crossed, + crossed H-A-R-D that the inter-Korean Tasty Kimchee [ + Diaoyus/Senkakus] can still be saved. |
Posted by: JosephMendiola 2013-03-08 00:56 |
#3 FREEREPUBLIC > [Yonhap News[ NORTH KOREA GENERAL SAYS PYONGYANG HAS NUCLEAR-TIPPED ICBMS ON STANDBY. I can't seem to get ordinary Net access this afternoon to Chinese, Japanese, or Korean News Blogs irregardless of search engine - I could be wrong, BUT IT WOULD APPEAR THAT MILITARY? NEWS CONTROL/CENSORSHIP IS NOW IN EFFECT UNTIL FURTHER NOTICE??? |
Posted by: JosephMendiola 2013-03-08 00:46 |
#2 "I can tell you that the United States is fully capable of defending against any North Korean ballistic missile attack," said White House front man Jay Carney. Wasn't a Carney the guy that dragged the Rubes into the freakshow at the circus? |
Posted by: Skidmark 2013-03-08 00:10 |
#1 I'm certain it is, but my Maha-Rushian questionne' du jour is whether the TAIWAN GOVT. + US is ready iff the Motherly PLA Airborne, etc. decide to drop in on Taiwan in massive conventional first-strike + follow-on??? Lest we fergit, CHINA = MASSIVE OR PROHIBITIVE PLA CASUALTIES, ETC. IS "MEH" = ALREADY "FACTORED IN" when it comes to finally having DE FACTO sovereign or military control of Taiwan. |
Posted by: JosephMendiola 2013-03-08 00:07 |