You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Culture Wars
Federal judge rules EPA overstepped authority trying to regulate water as pollutant in Virginia
2013-01-05
[FOXNEWS] Virginia officials scored a key victory Thursday in their battle with the Environmental Protection Agency over what EPA critics describe as a land takeover.

U.S. District Judge Liam O'Grady in Alexandria ruled late Thursday that the EPA exceeded its authority by attempting to regulate stormwater runoff into a Fairfax County creek as a pollutant. O'Grady sided with the Virginia Department of Transportation and the Fairfax County Board of Supervisors, which challenged EPA's stormwater restrictions

"Stormwater runoff is not a pollutant, so EPA is not authorized to regulate it," O'Grady said.

Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli says the ruling could ultimately save Virginia taxpayers more than $300 million.

An EPA spokesman could not be reached for comment after business hours.

The EPA, citing an abundance of stormwater runoff, had proposed a plan that Virginia officials said could cost homeowners and businesses their private property.

The EPA contended that water itself can be regulated as a pollutant if there's too much of it. The agency says heavy runoff is having a negative impact on Accotink Creek and that it has the regulatory authority to remedy the situation.

Cuccinelli, a Republican, argued what the EPA has proposed is "illegal," and he's not alone in the fight. He was joined in the lawsuit against the federal agency by the Democratic-controlled Fairfax County Board of Supervisors.
Posted by:Fred

#8  I recall that Urine is "Polluted Water" now do the EPA workers Pee?

If so they're polluting the waters every day.
Posted by: Redneck Jim   2013-01-05 15:16  

#7  I would like to strangle this particular agency with their own entrails, personally.
Posted by: newc   2013-01-05 13:15  

#6  Howz about Fair Share?

Something more official:
Free Water Undocumented Emigration Services.
Posted by: swksvolFF   2013-01-05 11:37  

#5  So does this mean I will not be assessed a $73.00 annual "Storm Run-off Control Fee" on my Virginia Property tax bill ?

--- Likey not, once money is demanded and surrendered to the State, it will continue to be demanded by the State, just under a different name.

Care to suggest a new name anyone ?
Posted by: Au Auric   2013-01-05 11:02  

#4  EPA employees exhale CO2, not counting the methane from the other orifice. So, the EPA should be shut down as a polluter or the appropriate orifices capped to prevent further degradation of the environment.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2013-01-05 10:59  

#3  They'll keep trying, JQC. Experience teaches they eventually win.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2013-01-05 10:09  

#2  Had the EPA won, they would have had no restraints.
Posted by: JohnQC   2013-01-05 09:52  

#1  CO2 has been ruled a pollutant so why shouldn't water be too?
Posted by: Glenmore   2013-01-05 09:07  

00:00