You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
Eli Lake: Obama Weighs Retaliation for Attacks in Benghazi
2012-10-09
Surprise: “The holdup is in Washington.”

President Obama has vowed to bring justice to those behind the Sept. 11 attacks in Benghazi that killed Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans, but the president hasnÂ’t chosen what kind of justice that will be. Five administration officials tell The Daily Beast that the White House is now weighing whether to pursue those responsible through law enforcement or via military means like drone strikes or special operations.

The delay from the White House could allow specific intelligence on the locations of suspects to whither on the vine if the suspects flee the country and evade detection, according to three U.S. intelligence officials working closely on the manhunt in Libya. A list of so-called high-value targets is now residing at a Pentagon office responsible for contingency special-operations planning, according to two of those U.S. intelligence officials.

The existence of the list was first reported this week by The New York Times. It was compiled with input from several U.S. intelligence agencies and is being constantly revised and edited as new information comes in to the CIAÂ’s Counterterrorism Center. Some U.S. intelligence officials say there is enough detail to begin military operations to kill or capture 10 of the operatives tied to the planning of the attack.

“These targets are believed to be located throughout Libya,” one U.S. intelligence officer told The Daily Beast. Another senior U.S. defense official acknowledged that some of the early intelligence could lose its value if there is too much delay. But this official also said there were risks in acting too quickly. “There is always the risk of flight in a situation like this,” this official said. “But it’s probably worth doing right and waiting a bit and trying to get more intel on these guys. You have to worry about relationships. If you do the wrong thing, the ramifications could be serious.” The U.S. intelligence officer said the information on the 10 suspects was “good enough to authorize action if this was Pakistan or Afghanistan.”

In those two countries, the CIA and the U.S. military have had quiet consent from the host governments to launch drone strikes on high-value targets. U.S. and Libyan security officials have in recent months negotiated a security cooperation agreement as part of a wider U.S.-led trans-Saharan initiative in North Africa. But there is no agreement between the U.S. and Libya to allow the kinds of drone strikes that have become common in the border provinces of Pakistan and lawless regions of Yemen.

The National Security Council, the CIA, and the Defense Department declined comment on target lists.

The choice facing Obama is difficult. On one hand, any military action could alienate the new government in Tripoli and carry risks if the intelligence turns out to be wrong. There is also a risk that any decision on this front will be seen as a political gambit with less than a month before election. On the other hand, a successful special-operations strike or drone hit could rally the nation around the president.

The special-operations activities in Libya currently under way to this point have been conducted under intelligence authorities separate from the 2001 resolution authorizing war against al Qaeda, known as the Authorization for the Use of Military Force (AUMF). That resolution gives the U.S. military broad authorities to kill or capture suspected al Qaeda operatives in Yemen, Pakistan, Somalia, and Afghanistan.

On the law-enforcement front, the FBI only arrived at the Benghazi consulate on Thursday, after news organizations like The Washington Post and CNN had already sent reporters. Several recent reports say the compound and nearby annex have lost much of their forensic value at this point. On Thursday news wires reported that Turkish authorities had arrested two suspects believed to be involved in the Benghazi attack.

Three U.S. officials tell The Daily Beast that the U.S. military has the special-operations forces and other assets in place to begin going after individuals in Libya. The Naval Air Station in Sigonella, Italy, flies surveillance drones and other aircraft that are capable of reaching Libya in a few hours. There is also something known as a joint special-operations task force that operates under the authority of U.S. Africa Command, which two of these officials say have capabilities to begin kill or capture missions in Libya.

“At this point, the capabilities are in place,” one U.S. intelligence officer said. “The holdup is in Washington.”
Posted by:Sherry

#11  Decision most likely will be determined on how well the next debate goes for Obama.
Posted by: Airandee   2012-10-09 18:10  

#10  Settle down, tough guy.
Posted by: mojo   2012-10-09 16:16  

#9  Brave, brave Tyrant Obama - He kill Osama Bin Laden you know - is desperately trying to find out where he sends his apology letter to.
Posted by: Silentbrick - Schlumberger Squishy Mud Division   2012-10-09 16:01  

#8  "Everyone is ahead of O's OODA loop

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA !!!
Winner of Funny Comment of the Week :-)

Raider
Posted by: Raider   2012-10-09 15:55  

#7  The choice facing Obama is difficult. On one hand, any military action could alienate the new government in Tripoli and carry risks if the intelligence turns out to be wrong.

New government? Calling it a government is a bit of a stretch. Maybe we should break a little glass and create a little rubble and quit worrying about alienation. I suspect these guys might be in the wind...or a part of the current government.
Posted by: JohnQC   2012-10-09 15:50  

#6  If I were Bibi I'd be a whole lot smarter than I am I'd hit Iran just after the election. No matter who wins.
Posted by: Barbara   2012-10-09 15:45  

#5  Most likely will not hit Iran before the election because Netanyahu will not allow Israeli/US attack to be used to elevate Obama's stature whom he clearly does not like.
Posted by: Harry Slusock9667   2012-10-09 15:42  

#4  Everyone is ahead of O's OODA loop. Just hope that the voters don't get stuck on stupid. Bad choices get bad results on our safety.
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2012-10-09 15:40  

#3  The Benghazi bad guys or the Tehran mullahs. One or the other will be hit before the end of October. Teh Lost Won needs a surprise.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2012-10-09 15:37  

#2  Hey! It takes time to gather a focus group - it took three days to arrange when they will have the exotic luncheon to talk about arranging a meeting to set the agenda for a meeting on the subject.

These decisions take time!

(yes... I guess I better include a /SARC tag here...)
Posted by: CrazyFool   2012-10-09 14:19  

#1  Eli Lake: Obama Weighs Retaliation for Attacks in Benghazi

Thought he already arrested the person who withdrrew security, oh that was him film maker who he claimed was solely responsible for the preplanned 911 2012 al queada strike spontaneous riot so that this does not happen again during his Hollywood movie release scheduled Nov 4.
Posted by: Jutch Elmeresh8452   2012-10-09 14:10  

00:00