You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
China-Japan-Koreas
Norks say U.S. is within its missile range
2012-10-09
Sure, Pudgy, say whatever the good Uncle General told you to say...
SEOUL, South Korea (AP) — North Korea on Tuesday warned that the U.S. mainland is within range of its missiles, and said Washington's recent agreement to let Seoul possess missiles capable of hitting all of the North shows the allies are plotting to invade the country.

Seoul announced Sunday it reached a deal with Washington that would allow it to nearly triple the range of its missiles to better cope with North Korean missile and nuclear threats.

On Tuesday, North Korea called the deal a "product of another conspiracy of the master and the stooge" to "ignite a war" against the North. In a statement carried by the rabid official Korean Central News Agency, an unidentified spokesman at the powerful National Defense Commission said the North will bolster its military preparedness.
I thought it was already bolstered...
"We do not hide ... the strategic rocket forces are keeping within the scope of strike not only the bases of the puppet forces and the U.S. imperialist aggression forces' bases in the inviolable land of Korea but also Japan, Guam and the U.S. mainland," the spokesman said.

South Korea's Defense Ministry said Tuesday it had no official comment on the North's statement, but Seoul and Washington have repeatedly said they have no intention of attacking North Korea.

North Korean long-range rockets are believed to have a range of up to about 4,160 miles, putting parts of Alaska within reach, according to South Korea's Defense Ministry. But the North's spotty record in test launches raises doubts about whether it is truly capable of an attack.
'Spotty' is MSM speak for 'repeated catastrophic failure'...
It's unusual for the North to say its missiles are capable of striking the U.S., but Pyongyang has often threatened to attack South Korea and the U.S. in times of tension.

Koh Yu-hwan, a North Korean studies professor based in Seoul, said that in the latest case, the North had no choice but to respond to South Korea's extended missile range but is unlikely to launch a provocation, as it is waiting for the results of U.S. and South Korean presidential elections.

Under the new deal with the U.S., South Korea will be able to possess ballistic missiles with a range of up to 500 miles. South Korea will continue to limit the payload to 500 kilograms for ballistic missiles with an 800-kilometer range, but it will be able to use heavier payloads for missiles with shorter ranges.

A previous 2001 accord with Washington had barred South Korea from deploying ballistic missiles with a range of more than 186 miles and a payload of more than 1,100 pounds because of concerns about a regional arms race.
Posted by:Steve White

#7  ION DEFENCE.PK/FORUMS > [Kyodo News] JAPAN MAY "ACKNOWLEDGE" CHINA CLAIM TO ISLAND TO CALM TENSIONS.

Tokyo to give "polite/respectful acknowledgement" of the existence of a territorial dispute between it + Beijing???

* RELATED SAME > JAPAN SURRENDERS ISLAND AFTER CHINA AIRCRAFT CARRIER ENTERS SERVICE.

DPK BLOGGER-POSTER = opined that Japan's return of Diaoyu Islands is insufficient - THE RYUKYUS/OKINAWA MUST BECOME INDEPENDENT???
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2012-10-09 23:32  

#6  D *** NG IT, MANILA = PHILIPPINES want the PHIL People to know the country will be absolutely positively categorically undeniably ...@etc. prepared - for an upcoming South Korean LR Rocket launch!

US can easily overcome the DPRK's fears by maintaining joint control of the ROK's tactical battlefield land-attack, etc. missles - IMO it is likely to do so anyway as the ROK's indigenous missle tech saavy continues to improve.

* FYI TOPIX > THE US IS SENDING THREE VERY DEADLY WEAPONS TO THE SOUTH KOREAN BORDER [inter-Korean DMZ].

Namely, ...
- NT EXCALIBUR Arty shells.
- PATRIOT PAC-3's.
- ATACMS.

* SAME [old]> CHINA'S LINES AROUND ISLANDS SUGGEST MORE CONFLICT AHEAD.

* CHINESE MILITARY FORUM > [Foreign Policy = old] ROCK FIGHT: JAPAN COULD WIN A WAR [agz China]FOR THE SENKAKU ISLANDS, BUT IT WON'T BE EASY, AND CERTAINLY WIDOUT US HELP.

Many Perts are expecting a Sino-Nippon war for the Diaoyus/Senkakus to be fought ouside of the disputed islands proper, espec as far as China is concerned as it desires to open permanent + unchalleneged strategic access for the PLA into WESTPAC, NORPAC.

IMO China is more likely to order the DPRK to aim its alleged LR "Strategic Rocket Forces" at Russian-controlled SAKHALIN - US GMD-TMD infers that that the US will supply its ally Japan wid advanced BMD-capable PATRIOTS in times of military crisis. In the absence of any Chinese nuke missle attack [preemptive or first-strike]agz Japan, + lack of Chinese ability to successfuly overwhelm or defeat any Japan-based GMD-TMD vee PLA saturation attacks, THE ONLY WAY FOR CHINA TO ACHIEVE ITS "SOLE", "POST-US" STRATEGIC GOALS IN NE ASIA WOULD BE TO MIL INVADE JAPAN VEE SUSTAINED CONVENTIONAL CAMPAIGN.

Mass PLA Airborne attack is subjective, wid high-risk of prohibitive casualties + aircraft loss agz both JASDFS + USAF; while Okinawa + Korean Peninsula + Taiwan [northern PHIL?] are likely to be hotly contested areas in a China-vs-US-n-Japan three-way.

As per RUSSIAN + ASIAN MIL PERTS, THAT LEAVES SAKHALIN - its just off the Chinese mainland + can be used to attack andor invade northern Japan while combat occurs in the south. China is a member of the SCO-CSTO along wid "strategic partner" Mama Russia, + China has also laid historical claims to Sakhalin + parts of RFE.
CHINA ALSO DOES NOT WANT JAPAN TO POSSESS NUCWEAPS, NWO OR NO NWO.

IN A THEATER LIMITED ONLY TO THE EAST CHINA SEA, IFF CHINA + PLA BELIEVES IT CANNOT QUICKLY DEFEAT JAPAN USING CONVENTIONAL-ONLY MILFORS, ITS ONLY RECOURSE TO ACHIEVE ITS "POST-US" GOALS IS TO USE ITS TACTICAL + STRATEGIC NUKES WHICH RIVAL-NOW-ENEMY JAPAN DOES NOT YET HAVE, + TO INTIMIDATE THE US INTO NOT MIL SUPPOR JAPAN [or Russia].

Even iff Japan did agree to give up formal sovereignty to the Senkaku + Okinawa islands, etc. in the ECS, to prevent a major PLA nuke attack agz Japan, IMO again China will demand that the US give up any + all Milbases in Japan + the ROK, + leave the NE Asia forever. CHINA'S VICTORIOUS "POST-US", "MANIFEST DESTINY" WILL BE ROLLING + CHINA ISN'T GONNA TAKE ANY ***** FROM THE US, NATO-EU, OR RUSSIA.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2012-10-09 21:13  

#5  "Cruising for handouts"
Posted by: mojo   2012-10-09 16:17  

#4  Behold the fruits of the Madam's Sunshine Policy. Which is why Iran can never have the capacity.
Posted by: mossomo   2012-10-09 13:50  

#3  You just go ahead and pop your one or two off. We'll shoot 'em down and turn your utopia into a green, glowing parking lot.
Posted by: DarthVader   2012-10-09 11:43  

#2  Norks say U.S. is within its missile range

Well, the Left Coast is. Call it Operation Pickaxe.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2012-10-09 09:14  

#1  And they are well within range of our missiles.
Posted by: Rambler in Virginia   2012-10-09 08:57  

00:00