You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Election 2012
White House Moves To Head Off Sequester Layoffs
2012-09-30
The White House moved to prevent defense and other government contractors from issuing mass layoff notices in anticipation of sequestration, even going so far to say that the contracting agencies would cover any potential litigation costs or employee compensation costs that could follow.

Some defense companies--including Lockheed Martin, BAE Systems and EADS North America--have said they expect to send notices to their employees 60 days before sequestration takes effect to comply with the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act, which requires companies to give advance warning to workers deemed reasonably likely to lose their jobs. Companies appeared undeterred by a July 30 guidance from the Labor Department, which said issuing such notices would be inappropriate, due to the possibility that sequestration may be averted. The Labor Department also said companies do not have enough information about how the cuts might be implemented to determine which workers or specific programs could be affected should Congress fail to reach a compromise to reduce the deficit, triggering $1.2 trillion in spending cuts, half from defense, half non-defense. For 2013, that would amount to $109 billion in spending cuts.

So the Office of Management and Budget went a step further in guidance issued late Friday afternoon. If an agency terminates or modifies a contract, and the contractor must close a plant or lay off workers en masse, the company could treat employee compensation costs for WARN Act liability, attorneys' fees and other litigation costs as allowable costs to be covered by the contracting agency--so long as the contractor has followed a course of action consistent with the Labor Department's guidance. The legal fees would be covered regardless of the outcome of the litigation, according to the OMB guidance issued by Daniel Werfel, controller of the Office of Federal Financial Management, and Joseph Jordan, the Administrator for Federal Procurement Policy.
Does anyone actually believe this promise does not come with an expiration date measured in minutes?
"This guidance does not alter existing rights, responsibilities, obligations, or limitations under individual contract provisions or the governing cost principles set forth in the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) and other applicable law," said the guidance addressed to the chief financial officers and senior procurement executives of departments and agencies. "Thus, agencies may treat as allowable other costs potentially associated with sequestration, including WARN Act-related costs arising under circumstances not specified in this guidance, based on the usual cost principles of allocability, allowability, and reasonableness as set forth in the FAR."
Posted by:Fred

#10  Grow a pair. Send 'em out anyway.
Posted by: Barbara   2012-09-30 20:16  

#9  The people who are at risk know it, formal notification or not. After all, plans will have had to have been made and shared for how to handle the shut down, whether temporary or permanent. All the non-mailing avoids is a document for the journalists to publicize. But keep an eye out for articles on the subject in local newspapers and television stations as the date approaches, because they will be there, even if the national media ignore as hard as they can.
Posted by: trailing wife   2012-09-30 20:15  

#8  so the jobs will be cut - but the people won't be told ahead of time. all so the election will be a "pretty event". otherwise all these notices would have been mailed out before the Nov voting date.
Posted by: Raider   2012-09-30 19:49  

#7  Every defense contractor should send a letter to the Whitehouse announcing that Obama will be laid off in January 2013
Posted by: airandee   2012-09-30 10:26  

#6  Law, who needs no stinking law. 'Rule by man over law' is the motto of this regime.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2012-09-30 09:59  

#5  Some defense companies...have said they expect to send notices to their employees 60 days before sequestration takes effect to comply with the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act...Companies appeared undeterred by a July 30 guidance from the Labor Department, which said issuing such notices would be inappropriate... Office of Management and Budget went a step further in guidance... the company could treat employee compensation costs for WARN Act liability, attorneys' fees and other litigation costs as allowable costs to be covered by the contracting agency--so long as the contractor has followed Labor Department's guidance. The legal fees would be covered regardless of the outcome of the litigation...

Aside from the suits-and-ties, the Friday afternoon news releases, and no visible corpses, how is this different from the promise to compensate a dead jihadi's* family?

*Substitute 'mafia soldier' or 'gang member' if the first imagery is too provocative.
Posted by: Pappy   2012-09-30 09:24  

#4  Russia is attacking this layoff trouble now.

Spain is an absolute mess.
Posted by: Dale   2012-09-30 08:16  

#3  btw - he doesn't give a shit if they are laid off, as long as he gets reelected
Posted by: Frank G   2012-09-30 07:58  

#2  "Layoff Notices"! The firms are required by law to issue notices telling employees that, barring any changes, they will probably be cut. Kinda not helpful for Teh Won right before they vote. His regime is trying to circumvent the law AGAIN
Posted by: Frank G   2012-09-30 07:56  

#1  Well layoffs have been going on now for some time.
The horse has gotten out of the barn. Claw back?. Anything is possible with this administration.
Posted by: Dale   2012-09-30 07:45  

00:00