You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Africa North
Obama Move to Give Egypt $450 Million in Aid Meets Resistance
2012-09-29
The Obama administration notified Congress on Friday that it would provide Egypt's new government an emergency cash infusion of $450 million,
Because the Egyptians have been so very, very good to us lately...
but the aid immediately encountered resistance from a prominent lawmaker wary of foreign aid and Egypt's new course under the leadership of the Muslim Brotherhood.
And the fact that our embassy was attacked two weeks ago...
The aid is part of the $1 billion in assistance that the Obama administration has pledged to Egypt to bolster its transition to democracy
What transition?
after the overthrow last year of the former president, Hosni Mubarak. Its fate, however, was clouded by concerns over the new government's policies and, more recently, the protests that damaged the American Embassy in Cairo.
We could have had more dead diplomats.
The United States Agency for International Development notified Congress of the cash infusion on Friday morning during the pre-election recess, promptly igniting a smoldering debate over foreign aid and the administration's handling of crises in the Islamic world.
Note how this was handled -- a notification during the recess. Feel the contempt Obama has for Congress and the rest of us...
An influential Republican lawmaker, Representative Kay Granger of Texas, immediately announced that she would use her position as chairwoman of the House appropriations subcommittee overseeing foreign aid to block the distribution of the money. She said the American relationship with Egypt "has never been under more scrutiny" than it is in the wake of the election of President Mohamed Morsi, a former leader of the Muslim Brotherhood.

"I am not convinced of the urgent need for this assistance and I cannot support it at this time," Ms. Granger said in a statement that her office issued even before the administration announced the package.
The need is urgent, according to Spengler, and growing more so. But if they want it from us, they need to work to deserve it, instead of obnoxiously demanding jizya.
Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, speaking at a meeting of the Group of 8 nations in New York, said on Friday that the world needed to do more to support the governments that have emerged from the Arab Spring uprisings, including those in Egypt, Libya and Tunisia.
Libya? Maybe, just maybe, if they track down the murderers of our ambassador. Egypt? Why bother, when the Muslim Brotherhood has made clear what they think of us.
"The recent riots and protests throughout the region have brought the challenge of transition into sharp relief," Mrs. Clinton said, without mentioning the assistance to Egypt specifically. "Extremists are clearly determined to hijack these wars and revolutions to further their agendas and ideology, so our partnership must empower those who would see their nations emerge as true democracies."

The debate comes as the issue of foreign aid in general made an unexpected appearance in the presidential campaign.

In a speech in New York on Tuesday, Mr. Obama's Republican challenger, Mitt Romney, called for revamping assistance to focus more on investments in the private sector than on direct aid -- a shift administration officials have said is under way.

While Mr. Romney did not address aid to Egypt directly, he cited Mr. Morsi's membership in the Muslim Brotherhood as one of the alarming developments in the Middle East, along with the war in Syria, Iran's pursuit of nuclear weapons and the killing of the American ambassador to Libya.

"A temporary aid package can jolt an economy," he said. "It can fund some projects. It can pay some bills. It can employ some people some of the time. But it can't sustain an economy -- not for long. It can't pull the whole cart, because at some point the money runs out."
We could apply that lesson at home...
The $1 billion in aid, announced by Mr. Obama in May 2011, was initially intended to relieve Egypt's debts to the United States, though negotiations stalled during the country's turbulent transition from military rule to the election of Mr. Morsi this summer.
In other words, they weren't ever going to get actual money, just fewer dunning phone calls from our collection agencies.
In recent weeks, negotiations over the assistance picked up pace, and the administration decided to provide $450 million instead, including $190 million immediately, because the country's economic crisis has become acute, with an estimated budget shortfall of $12 billion.
How many weeks of expenses would that mere US $190 million relieve?
The assistance outlined in letters to Congress on Friday would be contingent on Egypt's setting in motion economic and budgetary changes that the International Monetary Fund is now negotiating as part of a $4.8 billion loan.
It's gentler on national pride to call it a loan rather than charity, but it's not as though it can ever be paid back...
The administration has also thrown its support behind that loan, and officials said they hoped it would be completed before the end of the year. A $260 million infusion would come when the much larger loan is completed,
Someday that day will come...
according to officials familiar with the package. By law, all assistance to Egypt is contingent on the country's meeting certain requirements, including adherence to basic democratic values and the Camp David peace treaty with Israel.

The protests over an anti-Muslim video and the storming of the American Embassy in Cairo on Sept. 11 came even as senior White House and State Department officials led a large business delegation to promote economic assistance and trade in Egypt.

Mr. Morsi's slow response to the protests raised concerns in Washington, although administration officials later cited improved cooperation over the embassy's security.
Because Morsi wants the money...
"Nice planet ya got there. Be a shame if sumthin' happened to it."
The $1 billion in assistance has been cobbled together from funds already appropriated by Congress, but the administration is required to notify lawmakers of its intention to release any of the funds. Ms. Granger presumably can put a hold on that release and pursue legislation to reverse the appropriation.

Mrs. Clinton lobbied lawmakers last week during closed-door briefings that focused on the tumult across the region, including the attack at the American diplomatic mission in Libya that killed Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens and three other Americans.

In addition to the $1 billion in assistance, the administration is working with Egypt to provide $375 million in financing and loan guarantees for American financiers who invest in Egypt and a $60 million investment fund for Egyptian businesses.
There was a time that was not a bad idea -- some of that kind of thing happened in the 1980s. But the embassy attack in front of the visiting businessmen ensured that now will not be the time. Businesspeople do talk.
All of that comes on top of $1.3 billion in military aid that the United States provides Egypt each year.

A senior State Department official said that the administration would consult with members of Congress in the days ahead "to make the case that this budget support is firmly in U.S. interests in seeing peace, stability and democracy in Egypt and the wider neighborhood."
Posted by:Steve White

#8  Ooops. #3 not "P2k", "Glenmore"
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2012-09-29 12:29  

#7  Not another dime.
Posted by: Bobby   2012-09-29 12:02  

#6  I was certain the Muslim Brotherhood would let the generals and the modernists ride the economy down to the crash, then take over to popular acclaim as saviours, Instead they were greedy for power, and will be the ones to take the ride, waiting for their god to step in and save them for sake of their piety. Oh well.
Posted by: trailing wife   2012-09-29 07:41  

#5  Voluntary extortion. Little wonder they hate us.
Posted by: Besoeker   2012-09-29 07:28  

#4  lots of people are going to starve in Egypt anyway. They are the world's biggest wheat importer and the wheat price has doubled and their economy has crashed.

Their only real option is to grab some of the Libyan oilfields.
Posted by: phil_b   2012-09-29 04:24  

#3  Lets look at the record, P2k.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2012-09-29 02:25  

#2  Mikey, if we quit paying the bribes to Egypt lots of people there will start to starve. To prevent that (and to protect themselves) the Egyptian leadership will have to replace our funds (or food) from somewhere else. China? And what would China demand in exchange? Perhaps the only thing Egypt has of value - 'control' (some kind of subtle thing - not Chinese soldiers at the locks) over the Suez Canal. Last I looked they had an arrangement with Panama that had the potential to give them control over that canal.
Posted by: Glenmore   2012-09-29 00:50  

#1  You cannot pet rabid dogs. Egypt is now become a rabid dog. It was voted upon.
They've decided on radical Islam government. They don't want us there. Cut our losses, get out of there. End all payments to them immediately.
Posted by: Mikey Hunt   2012-09-29 00:10  

00:00