Submit your comments on this article | ||
Afghanistan | ||
Army Report Buried Islamic Motivations For Afghan Murders of US Troops | ||
2012-08-27 | ||
By Andrew G. Bostom![]()
Although the report is dominated by apologetic, cultural relativist drivel which attempts, in vain, to explain away these acts of murder committed against the US and NATO troops by their by ANA "allies," it also includes a crudely buried, sub rosa truthful narrative. This latter discussion is all that matters, and bears full, clear exposure -- particularly in light of the morally dubious excuse for the most recent spate of such killings of US troops. Specifically, General Allen in a pronouncement for which he should be forced to resign, maintained that Ramadan fasting, combined with operational tempo during the summer heat, were the drivers of these most recent killings of his own troops by Muslim ANA soldiers. [p. 3] U.S. Soldiers' views of ANSF [Afghan National Security Forces], particularly of the ANA, were...extremely negative. They reported pervasive illicit drug use, massive thievery, personal instability, dishonesty, no integrity, incompetence, unsafe weapons handling, corrupt officers, no real NCO [non-commissioned officer] corps, covert alliances/informal treaties with insurgents, high AWOL rates, bad morale, laziness, repulsive hygiene, and the torture of dogs. Perceptions of civilians were also negative stemming from their insurgent sympathies and cruelty towards women and children. But the most salient point -- blatantly ignored throughout the feckless conduct of our mission in Afghanistan, till now, and exemplified, glaringly, by General Allen's remarks -- was inserted (as item 40), non-sequitur, amongst 58 other comparatively trivial recommendations. [p. 50] Better educate US soldiers in the central tenets of Islam as interpreted and practiced in Afghanistan. Ensure that this instruction is not a sanitized, politically correct training package, but rather includes an objective and comprehensive assessment of the totalitarian nature of the extreme theology practiced among Afghans. | ||
Posted by:trailing wife |
#10 Sounds like the higher-ups are getting "touchy feely" about the enemy. If our soldiers on the ground hate the culture because it consists of unchanging 7th century barbarians, that is pretty understandable. |
Posted by: JohnQC 2012-08-27 16:09 |
#9 Really though, just scorch the place, Pakiland too, and be done with it. Let's see, listening to music and dancing are unIslamic and can get you beheaded but torturing dogs is OK? Makes me tend to agree with you, Secret Asian Man. |
Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305 2012-08-27 14:39 |
#8 Proc - that's the standard 'Affidavit of Support' anyone who wishes to bring over a foreign fiancee or spouse has to agree to. I believe 'relative' immigration visa's have a similar requirement. In addition you need to inform Immigration if you move your residence and give them your new address. I had to sign such a paper when I brought over my Fiancee. The obligation ended when she became a U.S. Citizen. Meanwhile Obumbles is illegally granting amnesty to illegal aliens and not bothering to track them and fighting like hell to prevent any ID requirements to vote. |
Posted by: CrazyFool 2012-08-27 13:01 |
#7 With "friends" like these, who needs enemies. |
Posted by: Thrunter Hatfield9793 2012-08-27 12:05 |
#6 However, somebody noted a couple of years ago wrt Iraq...note the number--very low--of "war brides". Guys were a bit busy at the time unlike garrison duty elsewhere. They were not billeted among the general population. Very few 'safe' places to mingle. New laws and regulations in place. Did you know if you marry a foreign bride now, you are financially responsible for her for ten years whether the marriage lasts two years or the ten and beyond? |
Posted by: Procopius2k 2012-08-27 09:17 |
#5 They aren't "rogue". The whole place is on the other side. |
Posted by: Spot 2012-08-27 08:10 |
#4 Apparently, some of the central tenets of Islam that the soldiers need to learn about include betraying your friends, abusing dogs, sexually abusing young boys and degrading women. |
Posted by: Rambler in Virginia 2012-08-27 07:24 |
#3 I suppose the report about the repulsive nature of the nature of Afghans is a step forward. It explains the dislike of Afghans by Americans pretty well. Presumably the shootings are a reaction to the sense of being unliked, huh? Crap. However, somebody noted a couple of years ago wrt Iraq...note the number--very low--of "war brides". The troops must be seeing something either not obvious to those not there, or so obvious those not there overlook it. |
Posted by: Richard Aubrey 2012-08-27 07:03 |
#2 Maybe, if the rogue ANA troops capped a few officers of flag grade, senior officers attitudes might evolve. Really though, just scorch the place, Pakiland too, and be done with it. |
Posted by: Secret Asian Man 2012-08-27 06:53 |
#1 covert alliances/informal treaties with insurgents And there you have it! |
Posted by: Besoeker 2012-08-27 01:33 |