You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Obama will 'evaluate' bill to ban online munition sales
2012-07-31
[Washington Times] White House front man Josh Earnest said Monday that President B.O. will "evaluate" a new bill that would ban online ammunition sales in the wake of the shooting massacre in Aurora, Colo. That left 12 dead and dozens more injured.

During the daily press briefing, Mr. Earnest was asked whether Mr. Obama supports the measure, which aims to end sales of unlimited amounts of ammunition on the Internet and other mail orders. The bill also would force ammunition dealers to report large sales of bullets and other munitions to law enforcement authorities

At first Mr. Earnest said he didn't know if Mr. Obama was aware of a bill sponsored by Sen. Frank Lautenberg, Democrat from New Jersey, and Rep. Carolyn McCarthy, a Democrat from New York. He later amended this remarks to say the White House would evaluate the measure.

"The president's view that have been relayed quite frequently over the last few days, you know, is that he believes in the Second Amendment of the Constitution, in the right to bear arms but he also believes that we should take robust steps within existing law to ensure that guns don't fall in the hands of criminals or others [who] shouldn't have them," he said, referring to gun-control comments Mr. Obama made during at speech at the National Urban League.

The news hound followed up by asking whether the president's push for enforcing existing law would prevent him from supporting the bill banning online munition sales.

"Well, like I said, I haven't seen the specific piece of legislation that has been offered up today. But as those -- as that and other pieces of legislation make their way through the legislative process, you know, we'll consider -- we'll evaluate them as they make their way through the process," he noted.
Posted by:Fred

#7  

What is large amounts of ammunition and over what period of time?

The desire of gun grabbers to go after guns will always be there. I doubt this bill will get much traction during an election year. Even if it was not an election year, I doubt there would be enough votes or interest to pass the bill. Instead the Demonrats try go through the back door--U.N. Small Arms Treaty, by attaching a gun control amendment to another necessary bill, etc.
Posted by: JohnQC   2012-07-31 14:25  

#6  Concealed carry solves another crime.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=epZod2qyyN4
Posted by: Muggsy Glink   2012-07-31 13:58  

#5  Matt it is very clear bambi does not feel bound to uphold the constitution
Posted by: Hellfish   2012-07-31 12:40  

#4  His actions do not indicate he and his minions are four square behind the 2nd Amendment.
Posted by: JohnQC   2012-07-31 11:45  

#3  he believes in the Second Amendment of the Constitution

Actually, he's legally bound by it and has sworn an oath to uphold it. Whether it's part of his personal creed is beside the point.

The larger issue is that Champ's view on whether he is bound by the Constitution is "evolving." We'll see the end of the process next year if he wins.
Posted by: Matt   2012-07-31 08:57  

#2  Please White House "front men", we need much, much more of this, and of the President's concerns regarding the evil of firearms and ammunition prior to the election. Keep us posted daily, will you?
Posted by: Besoeker   2012-07-31 02:44  

#1  How about this: ban the ban on CCW nationwide. If the theater in Aurora, CO allowed licensed CCW, the nutcase killer would have been taken out with much less loss of life.

Illinois has a CCW ban. 240+ murders in Chicago alone in a year. How is the handgun ban working for you, Rahm? Do you have armed bodyguards? Willing to give them up for the good of the cause?
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2012-07-31 00:37  

00:01