You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
International-UN-NGOs
Echo of an Impending War
2012-07-16
I am a bit surprised that the press keeps ignoring the growing probability of a big war, or a series of wars, in the Middle East. Observers and analysts, following in the footsteps of the Western mass media from which they primarily get their information, discuss one crisis after another, without trying to blend them into one picture.

Many factors from macro geopolitics and macro geo-economics indicate an impending war. These include, above all, an unprecedented rapid redistribution of power in favor of new leaders, especially Asian ones. We are witnessing a growing degradation of institutions of supranational political and economic governance: the UN, the IMF and others have become increasingly feeble. The G8 has turned into a parody of a world government, and the G20 is obviously following suit. Organizations like BRICS or the Shanghai Cooperation Organization are in no hurry to compensate for their weakness. Sovereign states are now coming to the fore. Yet their capabilities have been impaired by the economic and informational globalization, and they cannot fill the governability vacuum.

The old powers and their intellectuals are unable, or unwilling, to explain what is going on, while the new ones are not yet ready to do it, or unable to, either. Discussions about the state of the world economy and politics contain unusually large amounts of high-sounding pretentious nonsense, understatements, or outright lies. Add to this the systemic crisis that has predictably hit the EU, the sharp fall in the United States' prestige after its two military-political defeats, and the weaknesses of its economic model (still the strongest, though), which were graphically revealed by the world crisis -- and the picture becomes almost unequivocal.
More at the link.
Posted by:Pappy

#7  Some axioms: long time dictators always go down hard. Short time democratic pollster-driven politicians cannot get anything actually done, and noone forgets atrocities - ever. So yes, its wack a mole time again to some degree in the ME, and best if they just kept it local. I would worry more about the build up in subs in the Pacific myself.
Posted by: Northern Cousin   2012-07-16 20:15  

#6  Until someone cares about wars in Africa or South America, I will not care about wars in the Middle East. Have fun boys.
Posted by: rammer   2012-07-16 19:20  

#5  Whoa newc, O-man is slated to be the first world minister.
Posted by: swksvolFF   2012-07-16 07:27  

#4  The myth that Arabs are capable of self-rule could not be sustained forever.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2012-07-16 04:11  

#3  I think a drift into failed states is more likely. Egypt will be next, as the price of wheat goes ever upward, bread riots aren't too far away.
Posted by: phil_b   2012-07-16 03:21  

#2  EVERYONE knows Obama is not capable enough to be "In Charge".
Posted by: newc   2012-07-16 02:19  

#1  To do so would admit the utter failure of President Obama's entire Presidency from his "We're sorry!" world tour to his gutting of our military, to his inept 'reset' of our foreign policy to his bumbling implementation of pretty much everything to his destruction of our economy.

The media won't do that under any circumstances. When war DOES break out, it'll be "Bush's fault!"

Orion
Posted by: Orion   2012-07-16 00:09  

00:00