You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
Army ditches failed combat uniform
2012-07-14
NATICK, Mass. -- The Army is changing clothes.

Over the next year, America's largest fighting force is swapping its camouflage pattern. The move is a quiet admission that the last uniform -- a pixelated design that debuted in 2004 at a cost of $5 billion -- was a colossal mistake.

Soldiers have roundly criticized the gray-green uniform for standing out almost everywhere it's been worn. Industry insiders have called the financial mess surrounding the pattern a "fiasco."

"Essentially, the Army designed a universal uniform that universally failed in every environment," said an Army specialist who served two tours in Iraq, wearing UCP in Baghdad and the deserts outside Basra. "The only time I have ever seen it work well was in a gravel pit."

The specialist asked that his name be withheld because he wasn't authorized to speak to the press.

"As a cavalry scout, it is my job to stay hidden. Wearing a uniform that stands out this badly makes it hard to do our job effectively," he said. "If we can see our own guys across a distance because of it, then so can our enemy."

The ArmyÂ’s camouflage researchers say the story of the universal patternÂ’s origins begins when they helped develop a similarly pixilated camouflage now worn by the Marine Corps. That pattern, known as MARPAT, first appeared in 2002 after being selected from among dozens of candidates and receiving plenty of input from Marines on the ground at the sniper school in Quantico, Va. The Marines even found one of the baseline colors themselves, an earth tone now called Coyote Brown.

For a decision that could ultimately affect more than a million soldiers in the Army, reserves and National Guard, the sudden shift from Program Executive Office Soldier was a head-scratcher. The consensus among the researchers was the Army brass had watched the Marine Corps don their new uniforms and caught a case of pixilated camouflage envy.“It was trendy,” Stewardson said. “If it’s good enough for the Marines, why shouldn’t the Army have that same cool new look?”

“Brand identity trumped camouflage utility,” Graves said. “That’s what this really comes down to: ‘We can’t allow the Marine Corps to look more cool than the Army.’ ”
Posted by:tu3031

#21  Touche, BP.
Posted by: Pappy   2012-07-14 22:53  

#20  I think BP just won the thread.
Posted by: SteveS   2012-07-14 21:46  

#19  The Joint Strike Fighter of uniforms.
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2012-07-14 21:07  

#18  Maybe they should have asked Ralph Lauren. After all, he's done a stellah job on the US Olympic uniforms.
Posted by: Pappy   2012-07-14 21:02  

#17  "Essentially, the Army designed a universal uniform that universally failed in every environment,"

We often rail at the gov't for doing things in a half-ass way, but I think they deserve our admiration here. Anyone can make a high-visibility uniform with dayglo colors, but these guys have managed, using what is ostensibly a camouflage pattern in muted colors, to make a uniform visible against any background. And they only spent $5 billion USD to do it. Sure, it seems like a lot, but sometimes you gotta spend money to save money.
Posted by: SteveS   2012-07-14 20:37  

#16  One size fits all, eh? Hopefully that idea doesn't catch on.
Posted by: gorb   2012-07-14 20:33  

#15  Never understood the one-size fits all attitude. I'd like to see them bring back some classic uniform designs, when not in theater does it matter if your uniform is blue?
Posted by: rjschwarz   2012-07-14 19:10  

#14  In the future, everyone will become Canadian.
Posted by: manversgwtw   2012-07-14 17:43  

#13  Green for woodland areas and khaki for the desert. That's worked for a lot of years.
Posted by: OCCD   2012-07-14 17:06  

#12  Fred's training demands he auto-default to the worst case scenario. Outcomes beyond that (accompanied by individual survival) are ammunition for a future war story.
Posted by: Besoeker   2012-07-14 15:03  

#11  Why did the USN need to come up w/ it's own blue toned pixel camo?

It's a very slow roll to the "purple suit".

Another decade or two, we'll all be Canadians.
Posted by: Pappy   2012-07-14 14:55  

#10  LOL Fred
Posted by: Frank G   2012-07-14 12:38  

#9  I recall when the Army black beret was first introduced. The initial issue was yes.... Made In China. An almost immediate uproar caused a recall.


Posted by: Besoeker   2012-07-14 11:48  

#8  Bring back the tiger strip!
Posted by: bman   2012-07-14 11:41  

#7  re the Navy's camo uniform: If I'm on a ship and the ship goes down I don't want to be in the water camouflaged as a wave. Give me something in a tasteful white, thank you.
Posted by: Fred   2012-07-14 11:34  

#6  I remember pointing out how useless this pattern was in Iraq and being scolded for not appreciating the subtle charms of this pattern. I am glad they finally got someone on the Uniform Board with a pair of eyes.
Posted by: Frozen Al   2012-07-14 11:28  

#5  Related: Why did the USN need to come up w/ it's own blue toned pixel camo? seems like the bad guys would think something's up when they take a peek at a carrier w/ nobody on it.....
Smells like make work @ the Navy Exchange Uniform board......
Posted by: USN, Ret.   2012-07-14 11:10  

#4  This is ludicrous. It is impossible to have a one size fits all camouflage design. IMHO any reasonable intelligent, experienced grunt could come up with a decent pattern for the environment in question off the top of his head.

The backgrounds are infinitely varied and as a result perfect camouflage is impossible. Good enough is the best you can hope for.

This is nothing more than desk jockey envy played out with taxpayers money.
Posted by: AlanC   2012-07-14 10:15  

#3  and beret.
Posted by: rammer   2012-07-14 09:34  

#2  What needs "ditching" is the Army's Uniform Board.
Posted by: Besoeker   2012-07-14 03:18  

#1  Thank God.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2012-07-14 02:07  

00:00