Submit your comments on this article |
Syria-Lebanon-Iran |
Did Israel blow up Syrian nerve gas plant in 2007? |
2012-06-16 |
![]() It was July 2007 and in Aleppo, Syria, the muezzins were just starting to issue the early-morning call for prayers. It was a different Syria at the time -- Bashar Assad's rule appeared stable and was not threatened by rebels. Barely anyone knew that not far from the city, Assad was building a nuclear reactor that would be destroyed a few months later in a lightning Israeli airstrike. But then the city was rocked by an explosion. Looking out their windows, residents could see smoke rising from a military base located on the outskirts of the ancient city. The damage was isolated to a single building, one that very few people -- even those who served in the base -- knew the purpose of. Fifteen people were reported killed and several dozen more were rushed to the Aleppo University Hospital nearby with severe burns all over their bodies. Later, some residents would hear rumors about a number of Iranians being among the wounded and yelling out in Farsi as they were treated for their wounds. |
Posted by:Steve White |
#11 I wouldn't exclude Insh'alha maintence or safety practices, either. |
Posted by: Deacon Blues 2012-06-16 19:19 |
#10 I'm the power behind Fred's throne, BWHA-HA-HA-HA... |
Posted by: Steve White 2012-06-16 16:38 |
#9 Don't leave me out, guys. I confess too. |
Posted by: Barbara 2012-06-16 16:13 |
#8 Ssshhhhh |
Posted by: Frank G 2012-06-16 14:32 |
#7 I didn't want to say anything but the Juices get blamed for too much stuff already, so I confess... I was me. And Frank. |
Posted by: SteveS 2012-06-16 14:19 |
#6 I'd go with Captain Renault |
Posted by: European Conservative 2012-06-16 14:12 |
#5 bman. If we go nuts--Third Conjecture--we won't "start with" Iran. It will be ToT. We didn't go nuke ToT aftr 9-11. Nor did Russia after Beslan. Suppose we have a Beslan including mustard gas. Five hundred dead kids. Would there be the political will to go nuts? After the second? The third...? |
Posted by: Richard Aubrey 2012-06-16 12:38 |
#4 start with Iran. |
Posted by: bman 2012-06-16 11:09 |
#3 besoeker. Against who? Whom? Whatever. That's the thing with proliferated wmd. You might have an idea who made them--three years earlier, say--and maybe even the provenance to the actor who set them off in your cities. While I might be sympathetic to the Third Conjecture--see Wretchard--if things get bad enough and we nuke everybody, there's probably a limit. If we don't nuke everybody because whatever it was isn't bad enough to make us go nuts--Third Conjecture--we have to choose whether and who. And "who" is the question. |
Posted by: Richard Aubrey 2012-06-16 10:13 |
#2 Hmmm, Iran, Syria, North Korea (instructing Hezzies and Ham_asses) sounds like an axis of evil to me. How about you? |
Posted by: AlanC 2012-06-16 08:32 |
#1 There is little doubt that an attack against Israel from foreign soil using Chem/Bio armed SCUD rockets would prompt an immediate nuclear retaliation. |
Posted by: Besoeker 2012-06-16 06:49 |