CAIRO: The Muslim Brotherhood candidate in EgyptÂ’s presidential election run-off sought to broaden his appeal yesterday, promising he would govern in coalition with others and would not impose Islamic strictures such as the veil on women.| Not until after he wins... |
“I am committed to the presidency being an institution. It will never be an individual,” Mursi told his first news conference since the election committee confirmed on Monday he was in the run-off vote.
In a bid to win the backing of competitors who lost the race, he said he wanted to appoint vice-presidents from outside the BrotherhoodÂ’s Freedom and Justice Party (FJP) and said the prime minister need not be a member either. The Cabinet would be a coalition of all groups represented in Parliament, he said.
Mursi, a stocky, bespectacled man who has often appeared stiff in public but seemed more animated and relaxed than at previous events, pledged to quit the FJP if elected.
Though he and his rival Shafiq each took almost a quarter of votes cast, a big chunk of EgyptÂ’s 50 million eligible voters are wary of having either a conservative Islamist or a former military man linked to Mubarak in charge. Some say they will not vote in the run-off on June 16 and 17.
An arson attack on ShafiqÂ’s campaign headquarters and criticism of Mursi have highlighted the polarization and disappointment of many ordinary Egyptians, adding tension in the final stages of a formal transition from the army rule to a new president by July 1.
Mursi pledged to implement Islamic sharia law during public rallies, although he gave few details about what that would mean in practice. This has worried Christians, who make up a tenth of EgyptÂ’s 82 million people, many of whom backed Shafiq. More liberal-minded Muslims are also concerned.
When asked whether a Mursi presidency would seek to impose the veil, which is worn by most Muslim women in Egypt, he said: “No one compels anyone about clothes. Anyone who wants to wear hijab (the veil) is free to, or to wear whatever she sees fit from her point of view.”
But he also said that behavior in general “not only in clothes” should be dealt with according to the law if it damaged society, without giving further details.
| And that's the real answer to a good Islamicist... |