You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Africa Horn
Private navy planned to counter pirate raids
2012-05-16
A private navy costing US$70 million (Dh257m) is being set up to escort merchant ships through the pirate-infested Gulf of Aden.
No word yet on tour packages...
It will comprise a fleet of 18 ships, based in Djibouti, and will offer to convoy merchant vessels along the Internationally Recognised Transit Corridor (IRTC). The fleet will be operated by the Convoy Escort Programme (CEP), a British company launched by the international shipping insurers Jardine Lloyd Thompson (JLT) and the Lloyds of London underwriters Ascot.
Sounds like somebody worked out all the details and persuaded some of the nervous nells in the world ports to quit fretting over a few guns on ships...
Full funding will be in place by the end of next month, and the CEP hopes the fleet will be operational by December.
That seems to be taking a while...
"The shipping industry needs to stand up and be counted," said Angus Campbell, the CEP's chief executive and a former director of Overseas Shipholding Group, the world's second-biggest listed oil tanker company. "The time is now, not in four or five years' time."

Piracy in the region is costing the global economy an estimated US$7 billion a year. For the ship owners alone, every vessel sailing through the waters off Somalia is charged additional insurance premiums of between $50,000 and $80,000. Ships opting to carry their own armed guards can be charged an additional $18,000 and $60,000 per voyage by security companies.

Although the European Union is spending more than €8m (Dh37.94m) a year to maintain a naval force in the waters - EU NavFor - its warships still cannot provide close support to all merchant vessels.

The CEP, however, offers substantial savings to owners as well as protection from pirate attack. The CEP will buy insurance and use that to cover the ships in its convoys, so owners will no longer need to pay premiums, or hire security.

Instead, they will just pay a flat $30,000 to $40,000 per ship in the convoy.

The CEP is planning to buy seven 150-foot fast patrol boats, understood to be ex-Swedish Navy, and has already earmarked 11 former offshore supply vessels for purchase and conversion.

The ships will be equipped with fast semi-inflatables, called ribs, an array of non-lethal counter-measures, and 0.50 calibre heavy machine guns. They will be operated by a crew of five and carry eight armed security personnel each.

The programme will result in convoys of up to four merchant ships closely escorted by one CEP craft along the IRTC, with additional CEP ships in support, covering east and west-bound traffic.
I would assume that they'd be thoroughly networked with EU NAVFOR and with any US ships in the area. Be nice if they had some air cover available. A CEP mother ship with a helo on call would be just the thing...
Once in operation, the force will capable of escorting up to 470 ships a month through the Gulf of Aden, equivalent to about 25 per cent of current traffic.

"Our crews will undergo intensive training in how to implement a graduated response. We will be compliant with maritime law and will observe the International Maritime Organisation conventions, such as the Safety of Life at Sea treaty," said Mr Campbell. "We have had detailed discussions with the Royal Navy, who were a little concerned at first, but are now supportive, as are the British government."

Sean Woollerson, a partner in the marine, oil and gas division of JLT, said the description "private navy" did not apply to the CEP fleet.

The aim is to stop the pirates before they reach the merchant ship, and the emphasis is on non-lethal measures. Use of offensive weapons will be a last resort. "This is not a navy," said Mr Woollerson. "What we're trying to be is a deterrent force. Prevention is within our reach."

The plan has been put together during the past three and a half years and now involves 21 companies, including law firms, auditors and risk managers, as well as JLT and Ascot.

The CEP has agreed with the Cyprus Maritime Administration for its vessels to sail under the island's flag.

"Anything that can prevent piracy in this area is to be supported," Pottengal Mukundan, the chief executive of the Commercial Crime Services arm of the International Maritime Bureau, told the British newspaper TheMail on Sunday.

JLT is a leading British insurance business and was first established as a division of Jardine, Matheson and Company, which was founded in Canton [now known as Guangdong], China, in 1832.

Although floated off, Jardine still owns 40 per cent of JLT, which specialises in risk insurance, such as shipping, kidnap and ransom. JLT insures 14 per cent of the global shipping fleet and is a traded on the FTSE 250 Index.

"While this peril has always existed on the high seas, the scale and intensity of piracy in the Gulf of Aden has focused the attention of the shipping and insurance industries on this exposure," said the company's website regarding its involvement in the programme.
Posted by:Steve White

#23  Based on the open source info that the prospective craft are ex-Swedish, the possible is a Bevakningsbat (type late-60 or 70) class. They were stricken from the navy in recent years.
Posted by: Pappy   2012-05-16 22:18  

#22  Or some of the Russian oligopolists.

Posted by: crosspatch   2012-05-16 20:38  

#21  And if I were a betting man, I'd say one of Soro's branches has a tentacle in it. Probably on both sides.
Posted by: OldSpook   2012-05-16 19:48  

#20  The article itself says it is an Insurance company that set this up. They sell lower cost insurance to the shipper if the shipper contracts their "pet" security company to convoy them. For the insurance company, short of hiring some former SOCOM/SAS types and killing a lot of people in the chain of violence that are behind this, its a cost effective move for them.
Posted by: OldSpook   2012-05-16 19:47  

#19  "In 2011, 31 ransoms were paid to Somali pirates, totaling around $160 million. The average ransom was approximately $5 million"

Those are the REPORTED cases. You can buy a lot of weaponry for $160 million/year. Each event is a potential $5 million job so you can afford to spend a million or two PER JOB in the execution of it if that is what it takes. I am not sure the private company can afford to spend that kind of money per defense on top of the overhead in vigilance between attacks.

When the pirates aren't pirating, they aren't spending any money but the security company IS because it doesn't know from where/when the next attack is going to come.

My guess is they won't be contracted by the shippers themselves but by the insurance companies.

If I were this security company, I would also use drones to extend my horizon a bit. In fact, I would love to have drones in the air pretty much the entire time and track the comings and goings of vessels from Somalia. When there is an attack somewhere, just rewind the tape and find out where it came from (might be a different place from where it goes after an attack).

Or outfit what amounts to a couple of civilian J-STARS and just watch traffic for a while with no interdiction until you establish exactly where they are operating out of.

Problem with all these scenarios is that it eventually becomes obvious that if we really wanted to shut down these pirates, we could, but for some reason we aren't.

That leads me to believe there's probably also some sort of "protection" racket operating in conjunction with the pirates that has some major pull. $160 million a year is also a lot of campaign donations to politicians ... globally ... and if you are making nearly as much of protection as off the piracy, make that $320 million.

That we even still have this problem stinks. If you see politicians moving to shut this company down, that will stink even more.
Posted by: crosspatch   2012-05-16 18:22  

#18  One other thing: the "non lethal" stuff is window dressing to assuage legal concerns. "Warning shots" may end up "accidentally" without enough lead and too low... Some interpretations of Common Law and Maritime law allows pirates to be summarily executed. And this is a private company, working in international waters or under "universal jurisdiction" in unpoliced territorial waters (Somalia for example).
Posted by: OldSpook   2012-05-16 15:53  

#17  Defending thier position is fine - its preventing them from having a viable ability to attack that this accomplishes. Deterrent needs to be sufficient, and this, coupled with larger (NATO and national) naval assets in the area (look up CTF-150), are very likely to make any attempts at vessel seizure not only unsuccessful, but fatal.

Its a deterrent. All they need to do is put up a sufficient fight, and buy time for NATO/USN forces to respond.

The only way the "defense" enters into it is if we (meaning the US/UK) go ashore or bomb the crap out of the docks and boatyards. And honestly, following the money is likely to be the more effective path in terms of getting the real bad guys behind this. The skinnies that die at sea are just cannon fodder for the ones pulling the strings.
Posted by: OldSpook   2012-05-16 15:45  

#16  I predict an arms race. And I expect (hope, anyway) the pirate's financial backers might be exposed.
Posted by: Whiskey Mike   2012-05-16 15:37  

#15  They're not stupid.

Under-estimating the intelligence and will of your opponent is always a bad idea.

The Somali pirates have been making millions of dollars a year for several years now. They would be stupid not to buy armaments to defend their positions.
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418   2012-05-16 15:29  

#14  OldSpook, that boat looks like a heckuva lotta fun.
Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305   2012-05-16 14:39  

#13  I think crosspatch has the proper biz case down.
Posted by: Water Modem   2012-05-16 14:03  

#12  U N C L A S S I F I E D // FRUO

FM/UNIT/RBURGINT/J-2//
TO/COMNAVRBURG/COMNAVCENT/RBURG-ALLCON//
UNCLAS/FRUO//
OPER/SPOOKWATCH//
MSGID/SWAGREP/SR-001/161852ZNOV12//
PART/3/OF/3//
LOC/UTM:13N4398808501356//
SUBJ/Possible article error and correction//

REF/
[D]esigned to operate as a fast attack boat, patrol boat and special operations support vessel. Heavy machine guns are mounted in fixed installations, or stabilized and remotely controlled from a monitor in the wheelhouse. The boat can also carry mines or Hellfire missiles [emphasis added], and a gyro-stabilized twin-barrel 12-cm mortar. The boats have a loading capacity of 21 armed soldiers or up to 4.5 tons of cargo. The boat uses two waterjet propulsion units, equipped with two MAN D2842 LE410 main engines, each with a medium duty rating of 810 kW and two Rolls-Royce Kamewa FF-410 with waterjets, the 16 meter boat has a sprint speed of 50 knots and a cruise at 42 kt, and high maneuverability.//

RMKS: This fake report (SWAGREP) brought to you by an overly inquisitive OldSpook's curiosity and a HUGE amount of being bored. //

PART/3/OF/3/END//

U N C L A S S I F I E D // FRUO
Posted by: OldSpook   2012-05-16 12:07  

#11  FM/UNIT/RBURGINT/J-2//
TO/COMNAVRBURG/COMNAVCENT/RBURG-ALLCON//
UNCLAS/FRUO//
OPER/SPOOKWATCH//
MSGID/SWAGREP/SR-001/161852ZNOV12//
PART/2/OF/3//
LOC/UTM:13N4398808501356//
SUBJ/Possible article error and correction//

SUM/ The CB90 is the best candidate for the boat in question for these operations. GFiven the correct lenght of 50 feet, it meets all the other ideal operational and logistical considerations. Fast, maneuverable, can host an RHIB and combat crew(see below for cargo capacity), is crewed with 8 as cited. Armor can withstand typical Somali pirate attacks, up to and including RPG7, although the latter could pose a problem were it to hit near the waterline or bridge. It is also well enough armed, and can operate heavy weaponry as needed (Hellfire missiles, see below, c.f. Norweigan Naval tests elsewhere). Armament of twin 12.7 HMG (50 cal) is sufficient given multiple craft in operation on the same convoy. Logistically, large enough to do the job, but light enough footprint to reduce cost and supply consumption on a low intensity operation. Additionally, consider CB90 can use a simple (inexpensive) small freighter as a support ship for this sort of operation, plus the proximity of 4 (estimated) large container/tankers nearby in convoy for additional logistics support. //

ACMNT/ There are many CB90 in service world wide. The USN that operates 2 of these as "Riverine Command Boats" and the Mexican navy operates approximately 40. Sweden is known to have 200, so they might have spares. Sweden and the manufacturer have been known to lease them out for security operations (c.f. German Navy and operations against Greenpeace RHIB threats). There are also 15+ with the Malaysian navy to the east of the AO for hiring of trained support personnel on a temporary basis. //

PART/2/OF/3/END//

U N C L A S S I F I E D // FRUO
Posted by: OldSpook   2012-05-16 12:04  

#10  Definitely enough to give pirates a large incentive to "be some place else".

U N C L A S S I F I E D / FRUO //

FM/UNIT/RBURGINT/J-2//
TO/COMNAVRBURG/COMNAVCENT/RBURG-ALLCON//
UNCLAS/FRUO//
OPER/SPOOKWATCH//
MSGID/SWAGREP/SR-001/161852ZNOV12//
PART/1/OF/3//
LOC/UTM:13N4398808501356//
SUBJ/Possible article error and correction//

INF1/ 150ft patrol boat, Swedish. 150ft is Corvette size, generally with larger minimum crews than cited (25+ enlisted, 14+ officers). Expensive to operate in numbers cited (7). //

H/ Reporter Error. //

NARR/ Terminology error. RHIB, not "rib". This indicates the reporter got the data verbally (not written). Further indicates the reporter is not familiar with military naval terminology, particularly riverine, patrol and brown water operations. Also, larger ships of the cited size, unless mine layers or transports, are generally armed with more than two (2) 12.7mm (.50 cal) HMG. //

CON: Type is probably correct: fast patrol boat. Length reported is likely in error. Reporter may be accustomed to meters, and converted to feet for an American publication. 50 Feet is the likely length, reporter treated it as 50m and made the rough conversion to 150ft. //

PART/1/OF/3/END//

U N C L A S S I F I E D / FRUO //

Posted by: OldSpook   2012-05-16 12:01  

#9  Don't be too sure of that, Gromky. They're not stupid.

Under-estimating the intelligence and will of your opponent is always a bad idea.
Posted by: Steve White   2012-05-16 08:47  

#8  Perhaps JLT has airport security and border patrol divisions.
Posted by: Besoeker   2012-05-16 08:40  

#7  and 0.50 calibre heavy machine guns
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2012-05-16 08:08  

#6  gromky, if the CEP relies on non-lethal deterrance the pirates will live long enough to develop the talent.
Posted by: Glenmore   2012-05-16 07:33  

#5  The Somalis don't have the talent to attack anything but an unarmed vessel.
Posted by: gromky   2012-05-16 05:50  

#4  Hijacking these vessels is a pretty profitable business. It could escalate in intensity pretty quickly. In other words, most of the pirates are fairly lightly armed because they can be. This force, if it starts making a serious dent in the profits of the pirates, should expect to see a fairly significant escalation in the weapons and tactics used.

To some extent we might see some kind of symbiotic relationship develop much like we have with the drug cartels and the DEA where the two entities rely on each other. The security company might allow the pirates enough success to stay in business in order to keep the security company in business. The security companies would act as a barrier to competition for the more hard core pirates keeping the wannabe pirates out of the market and the hard core pirates keep the security company in business.

Note that the job of the security company is not to eliminate the pirates, it is to protect the ships so the company would actually have a vested economic interest in making sure the pirates aren't completely eliminated.
Posted by: crosspatch   2012-05-16 05:17  

#3  It's on and no reason to bring anything "Partisan" into it. Go protect your clients.
Posted by: newc   2012-05-16 03:37  

#2  Offset the costs by offering Pirate Safari Tours. Fresh sea air and target practice, ah heaven!
Posted by: Steven   2012-05-16 01:59  

#1  Extensive training for Night-time Security + prolly a few Mini-Depth Charges, LAWS since at last check the Pirate Boyz were interested in acquiring fast Stealth Boats + Mini-Subs.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2012-05-16 01:15  

00:00