 UNITED NATIONS: An end to a nearly decade-long nuclear standoff between Iran and major world powers will be possible if the United States and its European allies recognize TehranÂ’s right to enrich uranium, a former Iranian negotiator said in an editorial.
“Talks between Iran and the five permanent members of the UN Security Council plus Germany (P5+1), scheduled for next month, provide the best opportunity to break the nine-year deadlock over Iran’s nuclear program,” Hossein Mousavian, Iran’s former chief nuclear negotiator, wrote in an editorial in the Boston Globe.
Mousavian, now a visiting scholar at Princeton University in New Jersey,
| Nice work if you can get it... |
had been seen as a moderate when in the Iranian government. Although he is not currently a policymaker, such public presentations of Iranian thinking is rare.
| But he's not part of the government and he's safe at the People's Enclave of Princeton, so it's not really 'Iranian thinking', but rather what the reporter wishes 'Iranian thinking' should be when viewed in the proper progressive (rose-colored) lens... |
Iran has rejected Security Council demands that it halt enrichment and other sensitive nuclear work, saying it has a sovereign right to atomic energy. This has led to four rounds of increasingly stringent UN Security Council sanctions, mostly focusing on its nuclear and missile industries, but also targeting some financial institutions, a few subsidiaries of its major shipping firm, and companies linked to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps.
For the talks, expected to take place in mid-April, to open the door to a resolution of the standoff with Iran, Mousavian said the United States and its European allies must make clear that war and coercion are not the only options.
| Nothing else seems to have worked. 'Engagement' has been a joke, and sanctions don't seem to be convincing the Mad Mullahs™ to change their minds much. |
They should seek enhanced engagement with Tehran, as US President Barack Obama has repeatedly called for.
“This could work - since 2003, Iran has been looking for a viable and durable solution to the diplomatic standoff,” wrote Mousavian.
| Completely on the terms of the Mad Mullahs™, of course... |
Mousavian was IranÂ’s chief nuclear negotiator from 2003 to 2005 before conservative President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad took over from his reformist predecessor Mohammad Khatami. According to Western envoys familiar with Mousavian, he appeared at the time to be genuinely interested in reaching a deal with the West.
| Which is why the following occurred... |
After he was removed from the nuclear negotiating team, Mousavian was arrested and briefly jailed in 2007 on accusations of espionage. He was acquitted of that charge, which could have carried the death penalty, but was found guilty of “propaganda against the system.”
Analysts and diplomats said the charges against Mousavian were really a reflection of an internal Iranian dispute over how to handle IranÂ’s atomic dispute with the West. Some Iranians favor the moderate line adopted by Mousavian while the ones in charge others have backed AhmadinejadÂ’s more confrontational approach.
Mousavian writes that if a deal that is acceptable to both parties is to be reached, the two sides’ “bottom lines” should be identified.
“For Iran, this is the recognition of its legitimate right to create a nuclear program - including enrichment - and a backing off by the P5+1 from its zero-enrichment position.”
“For the P5+1, it is an absolute prohibition on Iran from creating a nuclear bomb, and having Iran clear up ambiguities in its nuclear program to the satisfaction of the International Atomic Energy Agency,” Mousavian writes.
| Eyewash. The mullahs want the bomb, and they believe the best way to get it is to enrich and at the same time to deceive us as to their intentions. The latter is Mousavian's job, and he's working hard for a living... |
The West also needs to abandon calls for regime change and accept that “crippling sanctions, covert actions, and military strikes might slow down Iran’s nuclear program but will not stop it.”
| Yup, nothing works, so we might as well fold and start the evacuation of Tel Aviv... |
“In fact, it is too late to demand that Iran suspend enrichment activities,” Mousavian writes. “It mastered enrichment technology and reached break-out capability in 2002 and continues to steadily improve its uranium-enrichment capabilities.”
| We were assured by a National Intelligence Estimate in 2007 that such things had not occurred. Wonder what happened to the writers of that report? |
The so-called “break-out” capability refers to the ability of a country to construct a nuclear weapon.
A US think tank, the Institute for Science and International Security (ISIS),
has said that capping Iranian uranium enrichment at 5 percent purity level compared with the 90 percent needed for a bomb could form part of an interim deal that would give time for more substantial negotiations. This and other priority measures would “limit Iran’s capability to break out quickly,” ISIS said in a report.
Among the things the West should offer to Iran is a package that includes recognition of its nuclear rights, ending sanctions, and “normalization of Iran’s nuclear file.” In return, Iran should offer the IAEA full transparency and permit the most intrusive inspections possible. |