You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
--Tech & Moderator Notes
New front page
2012-03-28
I've been continuing work on the new version of the front page. I think it's going to be faster and better-behaved than the current version -- the code's a lot simpler, for one thing.

The main problem I'm going to have will be the data import from MySQL. Postgresql shadows the MySQL version, but I broke it in 2010 (Don't ask. I've forgotten what I did, but it was stoopid.) The two databases have slightly different formats so I have to do a lot of hand work, the while deciphering the occasional cryptic error message.

I've got the headlines routine installed and there are a number of changes.
  • I think I'm going to leave it all in page order unless you're really unhappy about not having the current page at the top of the list. If you like it that way it's another trip to the database.

  • I've dropped the page hits column. That gets corrupted by various robots and spammers and who knows what else. I think the number of comments are a better gauge of what's most interesting.

  • Rather than opening a separate page, I have the headlines link to the article presentation on the front page. If you click on something that's not on the current page it'll take you to that article on the appropriate page. At least I hope it does. I haven't tested it was all browsers yet. Linking will work as it does now. Clicking on the logo will, as always, take you back to today's Page 1.

  • I've added the category to the headlines presentation, using the real estate the page hits column took up, plus a bit.

  • I've got headlines in category order, rather than posting order. I'm not sure which I prefer. I'll certainly bow to the majority on this...

  • I've added the option to view articles in posting order to the front page, without having to go to WoT Research.

  • I've widened the page a little. Modern screens are mostly wider than was customary last time I modified thing.
I've probably got lots of little digital cockroaches crawling around, especially when different browsers and operating systems come into play. Let me know when they're sighted and I'll try and fumigate.
Posted by:Fred

#6  I've got the databases updated now. The Postgres version shows more records than the MySQL. I believe that's because the shadow hasn't been deleting duplicate records.

I'm going to let them continue running in parallel just to make sure nothing breaks before shutting MySQL down entirely.
Posted by: Fred   2012-03-28 20:31  

#5  It's fast and even works great on my iPhone 4S. Many thanks!
Posted by: Alaska Paul    2012-03-28 18:26  

#4  I think you should have a button/ link at the bottom of the page to view the whole site + comments, so the main page is much shorter.

Also is it useful to know who last commented?

Might be more useful to have flags against articles so you can tell where the news item was from.
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2012-03-28 16:36  

#3  Fred, I'm not sure what-all you said, but thank you.

You are a GOD.
Posted by: Barbara   2012-03-28 16:21  

#2  Overall looks good and works well on my iPad.

But, there are some articles with a queer symbol between paragraphs and in random spaces between words: a diamond the colour of the page with a white question mark within.

Page order is fine -- colour is a good visual cue for which page I'm on, should I forget in those few moments while I'm scrolling down.

There are arguments for both category and posting order.

No issue about removing the page hits column, and I do like having the categories there instead.

I'm not keen on the shadowing of the article and comment boxes. It is pretty, but it feels uncomfortable when looked at long enough... possibly a sign I need to actually fill my new glasses prescription. On the other hand, as a visual marker that I'm looking at a work in progress, it's effective. ;-)
Posted by: trailing wife   2012-03-28 16:06  

#1  It's really fast, looks and works great in Chrome.
Posted by: newc   2012-03-28 15:04  

00:00