You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
IAEA suspects Iran may have diverted uranium for weapons research
2012-02-26
VIENNA/WASHINGTON: Iran has yet to clarify a discrepancy in uranium quantities at a Tehran research site, a UN nuclear watchdog report said, after measurements by international inspectors last year failed to match the amount declared by the laboratory.

The United States has expressed concern the material may have been diverted to suspected weapons-related research activity.
So it's not the IAEA who is suspicious of a diversion, it's the U.S.
UN inspectors have sought information from Iran to help explain the issue after their inventory last August of natural uranium metal and process waste at the research facility in Tehran measured 19.8 kg less than the laboratory's count. Experts say such a small quantity of natural uranium could not be used for a bomb, but that the metal could be relevant to weapons-linked tests.

“The discrepancy remains to be clarified,” said the latest quarterly report on Iran by the UN International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), issued to member states on Friday evening. The 11-page IAEA document also showed that Iran had sharply increased its uranium enrichment drive. The report's findings, which added to fears of escalating tension between Iran and the West, sent oil prices higher.

Iran says it is enriching uranium only as fuel for nuclear power plants, not atomic weapons, but its refusal to curb the activity has drawn increasingly tough sanctions aimed at its oil exports. In discussions with Iran this month about the discrepancy at the Jabr Ibn Hayan Multipurpose Research Laboratory (JHL), the IAEA said it had requested access to records and staff involved in uranium metal conversion experiments from 1995 to 2002.

“Iran indicated that it no longer possessed the relevant documentation and that the personnel involved were no longer available,” the UN agency's report said.

The IAEA said Iran had suggested the discrepancy may have been caused by a higher amount of uranium in the waste than had been measured by the UN inspectors.

“In light of this, Iran has offered to process all of the waste material and to extract the uranium contained therein,” it said. The IAEA said it had also begun taking additional analysis samples of the material involved.

Iran's envoy to the Vienna-based UN agency, Ali Asghar Soltanieh, last year dismissed the reported discrepancy as “absolutely not an issue.”

But a senior US official said in November it required “immediate” resolution, citing information indicating that “kilogram quantities” of natural uranium metal had been available to Iran's military program.
Posted by:Steve White

#2  Iran in 2012 must decide whether to formally declare it desires + will build NucBombs; or it will hold off building same while possessing the ability to quickly do so.

As subject to ...

* DEFENCE.PK/FORUMS > A [Air = ISAF/ISAF] STRIKE ON IRAN WOULD POSE TOUGH TEST FOR ISRAELIS.

* TOPIX > WHAT IS HEZBOLLAH'S ROLE AFTER ATTACK ON IRAN?

Even iff AIRPOWER + MOSSAD ASSASSINATIONS + COMMANDO, ETC. STRIKES are successful, at best it would only delay Iran's NucProgs while giving Iran legal + moral reason/credence to demand "defensive" NucWeaps [e.g. Post-Kennedy, Missle Crisis CUBA]; + activate Regional, International Proxy Terror Ops agz the West.

* PREMISE FOR UN-SANCTIONED US-IRAN WAR > either "IRAN HAS NUCLEAR WEAPONS" VERSUS "IRAN MIGHT DEV NUCLEAR WEAPONS", wid "Iran" = also meaning Radical Islamist MilTerr Groups + aligned NGOS.

D *** NG IT, CLEALRY THERE ARE "NO WMDS IN IRAN"!
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2012-02-26 21:38  

#1  Nothing gets by these clowns.
Posted by: gorb   2012-02-26 16:58  

00:00