You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Election 2012
Mitt is Too Rich, paid Not Enough in Taxes, gave Too Much to Church
2012-01-24
Mitt Romney offered a partial snapshot of his vast personal fortune late Monday, disclosing income of $21.7 million in 2010 and $20.9 million last year -- virtually all of it profits, dividends or interest from investments. None came from wages, the primary source of income for most Americans.
Just like the Empty Suit, except he made a lot of money from a book he didn't write.
Don't forget Bambi's Senate salary for a job he didn't do...
Instead, Romney and his wife, Ann, collected millions in capital gains from a profusion of investments, as well as stock dividends and interest payments.
They made their money the old-fashioned way - they earned it.
The couple gave away $7 million in charitable contributions over the past two years, including at least $4.1 million to the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Romney's family has for generations been among the Mormon Church's most prominent members.
We not going to compare this number to others, probably because it would make Mitt look generous.
The Romneys sent somewhat less to Washington over that period, paying an estimated $6.2 million in federal income taxes. According to his 2010 return, Romney paid about $3 million to the IRS, for an effective tax rate of 13.9 percent.

For 2011, Romney estimates that he will pay about $3.2 million, for an effective rate of 15.4 percent. That's in line with his earlier estimates, but sharply lower than the rates paid by President Obama and Romney's closest Republican rival, Newt Gingrich.
Real men give their money to the state for redistribution!
Just like Warren Buffett. Oh, wait...
The Romney campaign planned to publicly release the tax documents Tuesday morning but gave a preview late Monday night to The Washington Post.
And this is how the WaPo repays him for the favor?
It could have been worse...
In recent days, Romney's GOP rivals have pressed him to make his returns public, arguing that it is critical for the public to vet his finances before the party settles on its nominee. The revelation that Romney pays a significantly lower tax rate than most wealthy Americans underscores his image as a multimillionaire financier, an image that some Republicans believe would hurt his chances in the general election.
Real men give their money to the state for redistribution!
Economic inequality is emerging as a central theme in the battle for the White House, with Obama trying to harness populist anger at Wall Street and corporations against a backdrop of chronically high unemployment. He plans to call for higher taxes on millionaires in his State of the Union address to Congress on Tuesday night, embracing an idea advanced by billionaire investor Warren Buffett and Occupy Wall Street protesters.
Real men give their money to the state for redistribution!
If Mr. Buffett wants to pay higher taxes, he can start by having his company drop its suit against the IRS over back taxes...
"The president believes that it is not fair -- inherently not fair -- that those who are millionaires and billionaires pay at a lower rate than average Americans who give away $7 million and are struggling to get by," White House press secretary Jay Carney told reporters Monday. "This theme about economic insecurity for the middle class . . . is what got this president into politics. So this is a foundational belief for him, and he's happy to have that debate."
Real men give their money to the state for redistribution!
Posted by:Bobby

#11  Call me a traditionalist, but I oppose Romney due to his views on guns, taxes, global warming, abortion, big government and the individual mandate.
Posted by: Iblis   2012-01-24 19:07  

#10  That is why I believe that anyone on unearned government assistance should be in-eligible to vote.

No - you can't simply vote yourself more money.
Posted by: CrazyFool   2012-01-24 18:49  

#9  Members of the Free Lunch Party will oppose Romney.
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418   2012-01-24 18:01  

#8  We have a leech of a girl who gave birth to our grandsons daughter (Two idiots = 1 nice kid.).

In addition to WIC, etc., she also gets more back on her 1040 than she paid in (via "Earned Income Tax Credit" I've been told.), drives a nicer vehicle that my wife and I do, and am sure that a large portion of her cash tips go unreported. Staunch Zero supporter (go figure).

America, welcome to your new reality.....
Posted by: Uncle Phester   2012-01-24 16:10  

#7  He paid something, which is more than the majority of eligible tax payers don't pay any income tax whatsoever, and even get money from the government in rebates...

They don't get money from the government. Or Obama. They get it from people like Romney, who use fewer government services than the average Joe, and pony up more money in taxes in a single year than half of the population pays in a lifetime.
Posted by: Zhang Fei   2012-01-24 15:55  

#6  At some point those investments Romney has were purchased with after tax dollars. So at some point these earnings are returns on after tax income.

I have no problem with the effective tax rate Romney paid. When you figure that he probably has a home mortgage, dependents, and don't forget the Mass state taxes were all deductions from the Federal.

There's no story here, looks pretty good to me.

Warren Buffet made more in a month last year than Romney did the entire year.

The guys at Solydra also probably made more.
Posted by: Bill Clinton   2012-01-24 12:04  

#5  Capital flight (supra) ...yes, just like what's happening in CA with business fleeing.
Posted by: jack salami   2012-01-24 11:31  

#4  
$4.1 million to the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints so that's how you get to be President of a church.


No, that's called paying the Tithe. paying about 7% beyond the tithe to other charities means their contribution rate exceeded 17 percent.

I also wouldn't whine about him carefully choosing his investments so that his tax burden was reduced. He paid something, which is more than the majority of eligible tax payers don't pay any income tax whatsoever, and even get money from the government in rebates...

I'm no supporter of Romney, preferring the "give-em hell Harry" style of Gingrich, but get back to me when the IRS finds he illegally paid less than he legally should have. Or when you get the name of his investment and tax advisor.

Posted by: Ptah   2012-01-24 10:28  

#3  This is similar to what Wall Street firms do for their executives:
They pay them $1/year in salary, and then give them a "bonus" of several million dollars.

If fellow Rantburgers will recall, that created a stir in congress when AIG tried to pay their execs with bonuses instead of salary (on the taxpayers' dime).
Posted by: Frozen Al   2012-01-24 10:14  

#2  $4.1 million to the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints so that's how you get to be President of a church.
Posted by: Skidmark   2012-01-24 10:04  

#1  There is a very good reason why governments don't tax wealth. It causes large scale capital flight.
Posted by: phil_b   2012-01-24 07:33  

00:00