You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Culture Wars
Supreme Court: Judges cannot get involved in church dispute
2012-01-11
WASHINGTON (AP) -- In a groundbreaking case, the Supreme Court on Wednesday held for the first time that religious employees of a church cannot sue for employment discrimination.

But the court's unanimous decision in a case from Michigan did not specify the distinction between a secular employee, who can take advantage of the government's protection from discrimination and retaliation, and a religious employee, who can't.

It was, nevertheless, the first time the high court has acknowledged the existence of a "ministerial exception" to anti-discrimination laws -- a doctrine developed in lower court rulings. This doctrine says the First Amendment's guarantee of freedom of religion shields churches and their operations from the reach of such protective laws when the issue involves employees of these institutions.
Posted by:DarthVader

#7  Recall that Congress explicitly exempted itself (e.g. Civil Rights Act of 1991) from the employment discrimination laws that it passed.

It's a non-sequitur.
Posted by: Pappy   2012-01-11 22:22  

#6  This means that a Christian church can't be forced to hire a Muslim, Mormon, Jewish, atheist preacher. Ditto for mosques, temples, etc. In context it's just common sense. Bozo's were trying to game the system
Posted by: Pancho Angise6853   2012-01-11 20:41  

#5  Congress shall pass no laws applied to the public which are not applied to itself, staff and operations.

An amendment we probably need.
Posted by: OldSpook   2012-01-11 20:35  

#4  Not to disparage SCOTUS but aren't they getting a little chick$hit about such things?
Posted by: JohnQC   2012-01-11 20:33  

#3  Pappy,
Recall that Congress explicitly exempted itself (e.g. Civil Rights Act of 1991) from the employment discrimination laws that it passed.

Granted that in recent years the US Senate has extended some of these rights to its employees.

"Senate employees have the right to appeal employment discrimination complaints to the U.S. Court of Appeals. While this is not de novo review, which is extended to the private sector and Presidential appointees, it is judicial review."
Posted by: Mike Ramsey   2012-01-11 18:42  

#2  Well, that was an especially vapid comment...
Posted by: Pappy   2012-01-11 17:50  

#1  Congress gets a pass, why not churches?
Posted by: Mike Ramsey   2012-01-11 17:35  

00:00