You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Can a Messiah Win Twice (When He Flopped the First Time?)
2012-01-02
Four years ago this week, a young and inspirational senator who promised to turn history's page swept the Iowa caucuses and began his irresistible rise to the White House. Barack Obama was unlike any candidate the country had seen before.
Except for many who saw him for the empty suit he was, of course.
He was the object of near adoration among the young and the media twits, launching what often felt like a religious revival.
As long as Bush was the Anti-Christ.
Electoral contests rarely hold out the possibility of making all things new, but Obama's supporters in large numbers fervently believed that 2008 was exactly such a campaign.

Let us ponder what the coming year will bring for someone who must now seek reelection as a mere mortal. Obama's largest problem is not the daunting list of difficulties that have left the country understandably dispirited: the continuing sluggishness of the economy, the broken political culture of Washington, the anxiety over America's future power and prosperity.
His 'largest problem' is the length of the list of problems!
On each of these matters, Obama has plausible answers and, judging by improvements in his poll ratings since September, he has made headway in getting the country to accept them.
The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Saturday shows that 23% of the nation's voters Strongly Approve of the way that Barack Obama is performing his role as president. Forty percent (40%) Strongly Disapprove, giving Obama a Presidential Approval Index rating of -17. Negative numbers are up since June.
Not to mention that the poll ratings fell again. So much for that point.
Democrats are far more bullish on the president's reelection chances than they were even a few months ago. Yet the threat that should most concern Obama may not be any of the particulars that usually decide elections but the inevitable clash between the extravagant hopes of 2008 and the messy reality of 2012.
Hoist on his own petard.
In traveling around Iowa and New Hampshire over the last few weeks, I have been struck by the number of Democrats and independents who still more or less want Obama to win and deeply fear the consequences of a government dominated by Republicans. But having made this clear, they then bring up the ways in which they cannot summon the emotions on Obama's behalf this year that they felt the first time around.
No tingle on the leg anymore? The thrill is gone?
Aren't there fewer registered Democrats than there were in 2008? Why d'you suppose that might be?
Some point to disappointment over his failure to confront the Republicans early enough and hard enough. How, they ask, could Obama possibly have expected cooperation from conservatives?
He ain't that dumb, just clueless.
He didn't expect cooperation from conservatives. Doesn't anyone remember before the first month he was attacking conservatives reminding them not to listen to Rush Limbaugh. Not expecting cooperation from conservatives? He was attacking them from the outset!
Other saps are frustrated that he couldn't bring Washington together, as he said he would.
But O! You promised!
Still others point to real Obama achievements, including the stimulus and especially the health-care law, and ask why he was unable to sell their merits to a majority of the electorate.
That's easy. They were more empty promises.
Easier still, the things he achieved are things most America voters actually do not want, an opinion loudly and repeatedly stated by many of them.
And then there are those who wonder why the malefactors of finance have faced so little accountability.
Campaign contributions, perhaps?
Few of these voters would ever support a Republican, and most will turn out dutifully for Obama again.
Anything but a Republican! Rove and Cheney would come back!
But a president who won election with 52.9 percent of the vote does not have a lot of margin.
How much of the popular vote did McGovern get? 60.7% for Nixon to 37.5% for George.
He needs to worry not just about issues but also about the spirit and morale of his supporters. In their jaunty song on Obama's behalf four years ago, the alternative reggae band Michael Franti & Spearhead promised a country that would "soar through the sky like an eagle" and saw Obama as "seeking finds of a new light."
And none of the morons ever dreamed of being disappointed.
They were too f*cking stoned on ganja to be disappointed.
Are they a popular group? I don't remember them...
These are not the standards of normal politics. Can voters who supported someone as a transcendent figure reelect him as a normal, if resilient, political leader? This is Obama's challenge.
And it's entirely his own making.
Posted by:Bobby

#1  Are you better off now than you were four years ago?
Posted by: Steve White   2012-01-02 17:50  

00:01