You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
US drone may have come down in Afghanistan, not Iran
2011-12-16
The CIA's RQ-170 "Sentinel" drone captured by the Iranians last week may have gone down in Afghanistan and then transported to Iran by friendly forces on the ground, a former officer in the elite Quds Force branch of Iran's Revolutionary Guards told The Daily Caller.

The United States has never acknowledged that the drone was flying over Iranian airspace -- only that ground controllers "lost contact" with the drone and that it probably crashed. However, photographs and video footage released by the Iranians on Dec. 8, several days after they announced the drone's capture, clearly show that both wings had been neatly severed and then reattached.
The yellow bird doesn't look like a Sentinel, but go on with your story...
"This suggests that the drone landed safely and that its wings were cut off so it could be transported by truck," the former Quds Force officer said. "I believe it was captured by the Taliban inside Afghanistan and transferred to the Iranians, who then reattached the wings," he added.

The United States military has long complained that Iran supplies weapons, explosives, and money to the Taliban. The U.S. has identified camps inside Iran where Taliban fighters are trained.

Former U.S. Army intelligence officer Lt. Col Tony Schaeffer told FoxNews on Monday that he believed Iran's claims that it had interfered with the drone's command signal and forced it to land inside Iran. "If it had gone down inside Afghanistan, we should have blasted whoever had taken it before they could have moved it to Iran," he told TheDC on Tuesday.

The United States lost a drone to insurgents in Iraq in 2007 who managed to overwhelm its digital signal, which was unencrypted. The RQ-170 drone is also believed to have used an unencrypted data link, making Iran's claims to have brought it down through some form of cyber attack more credible.
So between 2007 and 2011 we didn't start encrypting these signals...because?
A three-way relationship connecting Iran, the Taliban and al-Qaida was in place long before the 9/11 terror attacks, and those connections have become increasingly close in recent years.

In July, the U.S. Treasury Department revealed that Iran has been sheltering al-Qaida's top operations planner, the man who ultimately took over from 9/11-planner Khalid Sheikh Mohammad. In a press release that highlighted Iran's support for al-Qaida, Treasury said that Atiyah Abd al-Rahman, the terror group's operations commander, had been its "emissary in Iran, a position which allowed him to travel in and out of Iran with the permission of Iranian officials."

A former senior CIA operations officer told TheDC that most CIA drones are programmed to "return to base" if they lose contact with their controllers, using on-board GPS transponders to guide them. The fact that the drone crashed -- or was guided down by a hostile cyber-attack, as Iran has claimed -- proves a malfunction occurred, but not one serious enough to cause major damage during a crash landing.

"It's unconscionable there wasn't a self-destruct mechanism on board," the former CIA operations officer said. "Someone is going to have to be accountable for that. It was a clear oversight."
Posted by:Steve White

#6  "Captured by the Taliban ..." > or by the QUDS forces of Iran that cannot be confirmed or denied as being in the Afghanistan by the US, Afghan, + Pak Govts except vee the Locals = Tribals.

* ION NOT-AFGHANISTAN AKA NOT-IRAN, TOPIX > IRAN WARNS IT WILL SHOOT DOWN US DRONES [next time].

Iran doing a Pakistan.

* SAME > IRAN DEMANDS AFGHANISTAN STOP US DRONE FLIGHTS.

* SAME > IRAN ESCALATES DRONE SPAT:US DRONE FLIGHTS [in future] FROM AFGHANISTAN TO BE TREATED AS "HOSTILE ACTS" [acts of war], by Afghanistan agz Iran.

Yoohoo, Afghan ally + BFF INDIA, you're up at bat!?

* SAME > WHY THE COMING WAR WID IRAN IS THE BIGGEST STORY IN THE WORLD.

Besides God = Bible, Nostradamus, 1960's = 1980's Guam Taotamonas + MTV, Texas-sized asteroids, Osama loves Whitney, .....@ etc., etc., etc., etc.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2011-12-16 23:50  

#5  Reverse engineering is extremely easy. And Iran has up to date automatic metal lathe devices. Further, there are numerous applications for the type of nano-technology that was captured.

However, in the midst of the 2009 protest in Teheran, BHO pointed to the "events of 1953" as a legitimate grievance of iran's terrorist government. BHO would be more likely to sell drones to those animals than to reverse the catastrophic damage caused.

People are prohibited remote controlled toy-planes near the White House. A country that supplies terrorists with weapons could target the white House, using drone technology. The Post-American president would blame 'fifties US policies, in that event.
Posted by: Chesney Gluter6645   2011-12-16 18:58  

#4  The Big Lie Prospers
Posted by: Ulose Munster2089   2011-12-16 08:27  

#3  Iranians are the consummate liars. They make the old Soviet propagandists blush.
Posted by: Ulose Munster2089   2011-12-16 08:22  

#2  Used a captured command link jammer on it?
Is it flown, or does it fly a preprogrammed track? What if it's GPS updates were bogus?
No beacons in the event these things go down hard so they can be recovered?
So many of them flying that there is no OVERLOOK?

I'm thinking a 'GunRunner honeypot'.
Watching C&C light up.
Posted by: Skidmark   2011-12-16 07:34  

#1  Hmm. Maybe it thought it was safe because it landed in Afghanistan, then stopped paying attention. Clumsy.
Posted by: gorb   2011-12-16 02:09  

00:00