You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Iran to practice closing oil hub Strait of Hormuz
2011-12-12
TEHRAN - A member of the Iranian parliament's National Security Committee said on Monday that the military was set to practice its ability to close the Gulf to shipping at the narrow Strait of Hormuz, the most important oil transit channel in the world, but there was no official confirmation.

The legislator, Parviz Sarvari, told the student news agency ISNA: "Soon we will hold a military maneuver on how to close the Strait of Hormuz. If the world wants to make the region insecure, we will make the world insecure."
Posted by:

#11  HMMMM, HMMMM, lessiree, BHARAT RAKSHAK > [Gilani] PAKISTAN TO SUSTAIN NATO CONVOY BAN.

ARTIC > GILANI = CLOSURE OF ALL PAK AIRSPACE TO US FLIGHTS NOT RULED OUT.

plus

* SAME/TOPIX > RUSSIA: NO FINAL DECISION TO CLOSE AFGHAN SUPPLY ROUTES [Russia-Stans-Afghanistan].

* BHARAT RALSHAK > {Eurasianet.org] AFGHANISTAN: THE PRESSURE IS NOW ON CENTRAL ASIA SUPPLY ROUTES.

ARTIC = indics that, outside of Central Asia land routes, it costs the USAF approxi US$14,000 per tonne to airlift supplies into Afghanistan, OVERLAND SUPPLY ROUTES ARE LONGER + TIME-CONSUMING, BUT ALSO FAR CHEAPER.

IOW, Russia + by extens CAR [Central Asia Region] Routes are still a QUESTION MARK AS RUSSIA WON'T CONFIRM OR DENY THAT IT WILL CLOSE THE ROUTES.

* SAME/TOPIX > ROGOZIN: CENTRAL ASIA STANS NEXT TARGET FOR ISLAMISTS AFTER NATO AFGHAN DEFEAT.

ARTIC > ROGOZIN = TARGET:STANS [Ex-SSRS] also read, NUCLEAR MAMA RUSSIA PER SE.

In sum, IMO any de facto Iran-led closure of the Straits of Hormuz only makes the Overland = Russia + CAR Routes more important to the US-NATO efforts in Afghanistan be it pre-2014 or post-2014. Also read, BAD FOR THE UNDER-THREAT-OF-NEW-RECESSION-OR-DEPRESSION-IN-2012 USA.

The reasons for US-led WAR AGZ IRAN, WID OR WIDOUT ISRAEL, JUST KEEPS PILING UP.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2011-12-12 21:44  

#10  This remains one of my favorite video clips of all time: http://www.navybook.com/nohigherhonor/vid-prayingmantis.shtml, at 2:12 into the clip.
Posted by: Lone Ranger   2011-12-12 19:26  

#9  China has begun deploying "dual-use" giant drilling platforms = rigs in the SCS capable of being quickly armed wid LR RECCE + TACMISSLE SYS, fka in Euro during WW2 as "SEA/CHANNEL FORTS".

Dare Iran in the PG be as serious as China in the SCS???
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2011-12-12 18:53  

#8  I'm hoping that we are watching them closely.
Posted by: CrazyFool   2011-12-12 17:55  

#7  More likely it'll be small attack craft, minisubs, mine laying (farther up the straits) and other non-conventional warfare tactics.

It'll be... interesting... to see what happens.
Posted by: Pappy   2011-12-12 17:54  

#6  Someone tell Greenpiece that Iran is hunting whales in the Strait of Hormuz.
Posted by: gorb   2011-12-12 17:36  

#5  Park'em next to the Iran Ajr.
Posted by: swksvolFF   2011-12-12 15:14  

#4  That's what happened last time.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2011-12-12 13:56  

#3  Iran has a small navy. Sinking it would most likely be the outcome of closing the Straits.
Posted by: JohnQC   2011-12-12 13:48  

#2  Good time for our ships to practice sinking Iranian ships...
Posted by: Steve White   2011-12-12 13:29  

#1  That should be an interesting exercise to watch. Do they need someone to play OPFOR or will they just ignore that part of the game?
Posted by: SteveS   2011-12-12 13:24  

00:00