Submit your comments on this article |
Fifth Column |
NPR's Robert Siegel Urging Socialist Revolution In America |
2011-12-09 |
NPR anchor Robert Siegel interviewed Occupy Wall Street's inspirational force, Kalle Lasn of the Canadian group Adbusters, on Tuesday night's All Things Considered and discussed how ripe America was for a socialist revolution. Lasn brought up comparisons to 1968 and the hope for a "full-fledged, full spectrum movement that operates on all levels." Siegel suggested back then, it inspired violent revolutionaries like the Weather Underground. (Well, violence wasn't mentioned.) Lasn warmed the heart of Bill Ayers by saying America is riper now for revolution than it was in the Sixties: SIEGEL: You know, I covered things that happened in 1968; some of them done by friends. And one thing that happened after that year was some on what was then called the New Left, misread big protests, crackdowns by police, and thought that the United States was in a revolutionary situation. Radical leftists have a "delightful" time talking on our taxpayer-funded radio network. Lasn may have been speaking with braggadocio because he admitted the "occupying the parks phase" was pretty much over. The interview touched on 1968 because Siegel noted that the OWS movement has made some foreign-policy noises against neoconservatives and "Some people think you're out of bounds identifying who are Jews among prominent neoconservatives." The anchor wondered if the movement should take on foreign policy as well as domestic issues, and Lasn said yes. Siegel also suggested the movement hadn't exactly seen any legislative accomplishments yet, which caused Lasn to insist OWS was more powerful than the Tea Party: SIEGEL: Let me ask you about what you just mentioned, and something else. On the one hand Occupy Wall Street protesters did urge people to move their money out of banks that were increasing their debit cards fees. |
Posted by:Anonymoose |
#13 "Well, China and Russia aren't." Ohh, they ARE. Masked by our debt and Russia's oil lust. Un-sustainable both. |
Posted by: newc 2011-12-09 23:39 |
#12 Er Republicans have most of the private firearms, most of the food production and most of the armed forces... And mobility (oil and gas). Siege warfare will be a blast. |
Posted by: Slatle Bumble5851 2011-12-09 21:11 |
#11 I do not know why every country on the planet must be a bankrupt welfare state. I do not know why Americans want to be like Europe even while it bankrupts in front of our eyes. Well, China and Russia aren't. |
Posted by: Thing From Snowy Mountain 2011-12-09 18:52 |
#10 Lest we fergit, 1990's NET + PRE, POST 9-11 + WAR FOR PRO-US-VS-ANTI-US OWG-NWO = Among other, THE US mst must Must MUST M-U-S-T MMMMUUUUSSSSTTT - MUST, MUST, SPELLED M-U-S-S, D **** YOU, MUST - ADOPT SOCIALISM OR BE DESTROYED! EX-POTUS BILL CLINTON = "The US must be contrained/controlled". But in 2011, I digress .... |
Posted by: JosephMendiola 2011-12-09 18:51 |
#9 Wouldn't work until the got rid of that pesky 2nd admendment. Hence Fast and Furious... |
Posted by: CrazyFool 2011-12-09 18:09 |
#8 > one can not easily predict in which direction a revolution will go. Er Republicans have most of the private firearms, most of the food production and most of the armed forces... |
Posted by: Bright Pebbles 2011-12-09 17:34 |
#7 Siegel asked how ripe America was for a socialist revolution? This sounds like wishful thinking on his part. Better be careful what you wish for. Socialist and communist revolutions have been exceedingly violent and destructive and not particularly discriminating in who they called enemies of the state. The press is usually the first to go. And while Siegel might be having a wet dream about a socialist revolution, one can not easily predict in which direction a revolution will go. |
Posted by: JohnQC 2011-12-09 16:41 |
#6 a vibrant bottoms-up democracy That's different from government by consent of the governed. The USA was never intended to be a democracy in the sense Lasn makes, from its very beginnings. Lasn seems to be referring to the Red Guards of the 1960's or the Jacobins of the 1700's. The world has already had far too much of that crap. |
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418 2011-12-09 13:56 |
#5 Just arrest and try him, treason's stoll a crime. |
Posted by: Redneck Jim 2011-12-09 12:59 |
#4 All in favor of sending Mr. Siegel to Cuba? |
Posted by: DarthVader 2011-12-09 12:17 |
#3 We already are a socialist state you stupid idiot. I do not know why every country on the planet must be a bankrupt welfare state. I do not know why Americans want to be like Europe even while it bankrupts in front of our eyes. Why do we send tax money to that stupid NPR anyways? Stupid commies. |
Posted by: newc 2011-12-09 11:36 |
#2 Government Socialism is the cause of the worldwide economic difficulities we now experience. Government socialism will be the cause of the worldwide depression next year. These people are not builders. They are parasites sucking the life out of those who produce. When they need money, they print more. The EU is a good example. Kick the can. Nothing has been fixed. Just mountains of more debt. This is the great new world order. Trainwreck in progress. Next they will nationalise everything to feed their causes. That will also fail. Like a drowning person. They will pull as many down with them to stay on top. |
Posted by: Dale 2011-12-09 10:36 |
#1 One more to add to the list of those to have a ceausescu moment when they kick off. |
Posted by: Bright Pebbles 2011-12-09 10:35 |