You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Economy
Obama defends delay in approving U.S.-Canada pipeline
2011-12-09
(Xinhua) -- U.S. President Barack Why can't I just eat my waffle? Obama on Wednesday defended the government's move to delay the approval process of a proposed oil pipeline between Canada and the United States.

Appearing at a joint presser with Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper after their meeting at the White House, Obama said it is important for the U.S. to examine the project "rigorously," and the project's environmental impact must be "properly understood."
Is there something that makes this pipeline different than the dozens of others that criss-cross our country? Too bad the Pubs aren't asking that question loudly, since we all know why Bambi is trying to stop this one. Make the Democrats explain why the other pipelines are okay and this one isn't.
U.S. State Department last month delayed potential approval of the Keystone XL pipeline until 2013, falling after the presidential election due to intense opposition from environmentalists as well as public officials in the United States.

The 7-billion-U.S.-dollar pipeline proposed by TransCanada, an energy giant based Canada, would run 1,700 miles (2,720 km) to connect Canada's oil sands to refineries around Houston and the Gulf of Mexico.

"We've seen Democrats and Republicans express concerns about it.
Name one known Republican who has done so...
And it is my job as president of the United States to make sure that a process is followed that examines all the options," said Obama.

There are no political considerations for the administration's delay of a decision on the pipeline until early 2013, insisted the president, who is seeking reelection next year.

Republicans are pressing Obama to accelerate the project, saying the pipeline could significantly reduce U.S. dependence on Middle Eastern oil while providing thousands of jobs.

Meanwhile,
...back at the bunker, his Excellency called a hurried meeting of his closest advisors. It was to be his last. They discussed the officers's efficiency rating system...
Republican leaders are also mulling including accelerated approval of the pipeline in legislation extending a payroll tax cut that is set to expire on January. 1.

However,
a good lie finds more believers than a bad truth...
Obama opposed linking the pipeline to payroll tax cut, saying it should not be held hostage by any other issue and he would reject any such effort by congressional Republicans.
Posted by:Fred

#10  The House will pass it with teh XL Pipeline in it. Harry or Zero will have to explain why they want to kill jobs and oil independence. Good luck. I see Senate Dems in unsafe seats voting for it
Posted by: Frank G   2011-12-09 23:18  

#9  The Keystone XL capacity capacity is 1.1 million barrels/day. That's 11.7% of total net oil imports for 2010 (9.44 million barrels/day). It is also the amount of oil imported in 2010 from Saudi Arabia (1.1 million) and greater than from Nigeria (1.0 million) or Venezuela (.97 million). Not like it's important when we spend $200 billion/year and a 500 American lives/year defending Middle Eastern oil imports.
Posted by: Slatle Bumble5851   2011-12-09 22:52  

#8  No president has been legitimately re-elected post WWII with the job approval ratings he now has.

FIFY. It's not the votes that count, but who counts the votes.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2011-12-09 22:13  

#7  Thought this project had good bipartisan support. Obummer once again kicks the can down the road until after the 2012 election. He is giving up shovel ready jobs for environmental votes? Sounds like a losing approach for BHO. This is going to backfire on him. Not too bright. No president has been re-elected post WWII with the job approval ratings he now has.
Posted by: JohnQC   2011-12-09 18:16  

#6   When the Big Inch and Little Inch pipelines were built as an emergency war measure early in WWII, the only 'expressed concerns' were that the pipelines weren't built fast enough. Many ships and merchant mariners got destroyed by U-boats because there was no pipeline alternative. GIs are still getting killed in Asia because the US still depends on the jihadi oil system. Somehow this is too difficult for Americans to understand.
As far as environmental concerns go, 'gooney birds' were being protected on Midway Island even as battles were fought in the area.
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418   2011-12-09 13:37  

#5  Prudent while unemployment is low, the economy is growing nicely and the dollar is stable.
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2011-12-09 12:02  

#4  They can send it all south on trucks to rail terminals, it'll just cost more money.

Of course, part of the cost is trains and trucks colliding with home-folks midget electric cars. And the diesel exhaust. A few spills, maybe a big fire or two...
Posted by: Bobby   2011-12-09 08:26  

#3  then you would need multiple pipelines and a distribution network for the refined product to get it from that refinery to market Skid.
Posted by: abu do you love   2011-12-09 04:32  

#2  The 7-billion-U.S.-dollar pipeline proposed by TransCanada, an energy giant based Canada, would run 1,700 miles (2,720 km) to connect Canada's oil sands to refineries around Houston and the Gulf of Mexico.


Seems $7B would build quite a refinery in Canada.
Posted by: Skidmark   2011-12-09 02:54  

#1  Republicans are the stupid party. The democrats are the EVIL party. Evil trumps stupid all the time. Alert the STUPID GOP.

What the HELL?????????????????
Posted by: newc   2011-12-09 00:10  

00:00