You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Economy
Pipeline Sellout
2011-11-18
His near--$1 trillion stimulus begat a stagnant economy with 9 percent unemployment. His attempt at Wall Street reform left in place a still too-big-to-fail financial system as vulnerable today as when he came into office. His green-energy fantasies yielded Solyndra cronyism and a cap-and-trade regime not even a Democratic Congress would pass.

And now his signature achievement, Obamacare, is headed to the Supreme Court, where it could very well be struck down, just a week after its central element was overwhelmingly repudiated (2--1) by the good burghers of Ohio.

So what do you do when you say you can, but, it turns out, you can't? Blame the other guy. Charge the Republicans with making governing impossible. Never mind that you had control of the Congress for two-thirds of your current tenure. It's all the fault of Republican rejectionism.

Hence: "We Can't Wait." We can't wait while they obstruct. We can't wait while they dither with my jobs bill. Write Congress today! Vote Democrat tomorrow!

We can't wait. Except for certain exceptions, such as the 1,700-mile trans-U.S. Keystone XL pipeline, carrying Alberta oil to Texas refineries, which would have created thousands of American jobs and increased our energy independence.

For that, we can wait, it seems. President Obama decreed that any decision must wait 12 to 18 months -- postponed, by amazing coincidence, until after next year's election.

Why? Because the pipeline angered Obama's environmental constituency. But their complaints are risible. Global warming from the extraction of the Alberta tar sands? Canada will extract the oil anyway. If it doesn't go to us, it will go to China. Net effect on the climate if we don't take that oil? Zero.

Danger to a major aquifer, which the pipeline traverses? It is already crisscrossed by 25,000 miles of pipeline, enough to circle the Earth. Moreover, the State Department had subjected Keystone to three years of review -- the most exhaustive study of any oil pipeline in U.S. history -- and twice concluded in voluminous studies that there would be no significant environmental harm.

So what happened? "The administration," reported the New York Times, "had in recent days been exploring ways to put off the decision until after the presidential election." Exploring ways to improve the project? Hardly. Exploring ways to get past the election.
Posted by:Beavis

#5  Re-election politics trump everything. Jobs are dispensable in the equation. BO is kicking all the cans down the road until after the election.
Posted by: JohnQC   2011-11-18 16:48  

#4  Instead of building a pipeline across the nation why not build a refinery in place then sell the products?
The same consideration might apply to the oil & gas boom in western North Dakota. None has proposed a locally built refinery. Maybe there's a good reason for the missing proposal.
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418   2011-11-18 15:32  

#3  Tried to answer, if multi-posts apologies.

There are a number of by-products, refining there would require individual transport of each product.

Refinary would require a large enough workforce a mini-city would also need to be built, as well as transport.

Pipeline is very safe, rather than a fleet of trucks or new rail needing to be built.

Weather considerations, if the weather is bad the transport out would be affected.

Facilities, expertise, emergency response, distribution hub already in place.

Is it more efficient to refine in warmer climates, similar to launching space vehicles closer to the equator?
Posted by: swksvolFF   2011-11-18 12:46  

#2  Please do not flame me as this is an honest question and I do not know the answer. I am sure I am missing something. But I do not see it.

Instead of building a pipeline across the nation why not build a refinery in place then sell the products?

It seems that it would cut off the objectors off at the knees. Might be tough to resist buying cheap gasoline(?) and they could use existing pipelines maybe with some additions.
Posted by: kelly   2011-11-18 11:51  

#1  Pipeline has been under construction, that is out of planning and approval, for years now. Suddenly, it is under scrutiny? If any of these people can find the aquafir on the map they would know it is huge, and it isn't like there are a number of safety procedure in place nevermind natural and artificial filter in place; it's not some Roman aquaduct that will tip over and then nobody notices. I call BS.
Posted by: swksvolFF   2011-11-18 11:13  

00:00