Submit your comments on this article | |
Home Front: WoT | |
Project Gunwalker: Grassley: Holder refusing to provide 11 witnesses | |
2011-11-11 | |
Iowa Republican Sen. Chuck Grassley said Thursday that Attorney General Eric Holder is continuing to stonewall congressional investigation into Operation Fast and Furious. This time, Holder is refusing to provide 11 of the 12 witnesses Grassley and House Oversight Committee Chairman Rep. Darrell Issa have requested be made available for interviews.
Grassley and Issa are demanding to know who was involved in crafting a February 4 letter to the Department of Justice sent to Congress, which contained claims -- now understood to be false -- that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives did not allow guns to walk into Mexico. Assistant Attorney General Lanny Breuer, Holder's deputy and the head of the DOJ Criminal Division, admitted last week that the DOJ's claims that the ATF did not allow guns to walk were false. "It also appears from those documents that Mr. Breuer's deputy, Jason Weinstein, knew about ATF walking guns in both operations," Grassley said on Thursday. "Anyone who knew about gunwalking in any case, also knew that the department's initial letter to me was false. The attorney general said the letter was based on the best information available at the time. But senior officials at headquarters, like Breuer and Weinstein, knew better." Grassley also said that he's glad Holder "finally admitted that the whistleblowers were right all along about gunwalking in Fast and Furious." But, Grassley said that isn't enough -- Holder must take responsibility for the deadly program. "While I am pleased that the attorney general is no longer trying to deny the obvious, he did not fully own up to his responsibility," Grassley said. | |
Posted by:Sherry |
#4 ...don't screw up the appeal for protection against double jeopardy. Need to leave the process clean to allow Mexico City to extradite. |
Posted by: Procopius2k 2011-11-11 10:53 |
#3 1. These clowns were so stupid they thought this would never get out. 2. These bastards figured it would probably get out but it wouldn't cause them any trouble they really minded. IOW, they have figured out that they have ways to avoid any actual difficulty coming at them. I can't think of a 3. |
Posted by: Richard Aubrey 2011-11-11 10:44 |
#2 Contempt of congress is pretty toothless against executive branch personnel. However, the committee can most definitely forward articles of impeachment for the Attorney General. Though the Democrat senate would never convict Holder, he could then be seen as such a political liability that Obama would throw him under the bus. |
Posted by: Anonymoose 2011-11-11 08:08 |
#1 Wouldn't it be about time for impeachment of Holder for contempt of Congress? |
Posted by: crosspatch 2011-11-11 01:10 |