Submit your comments on this article | ||||
Home Front: Politix | ||||
Obama Couldn't Wait: His New Christmas Tree Tax | ||||
2011-11-09 | ||||
![]()
Most of us weren't aware that there was any problem with the image and marketing of Christmas trees. No doubt the federal government's involvement will somehow make the production and distribution of Christmas trees more efficient. And it's only 15 little pennies. The tax will no doubt remain at that level forever. But wait! There's more! In the Federal Register of November 8, 2011, Acting Administrator of Agricultural Marketing David R. Shipman announced that the Secretary of Agriculture will appoint a Christmas Tree Promotion Board. I was just saying to the Little Woman over my cornflakes the other day: "Y'know, Honey, with all the problems this country's facing now, what we really need is a Christmas Tree Control Board." The purpose of the Board is to run a "program of promotion, research, evaluation, and information designed to strengthen the Christmas tree industry's position in the marketplace; maintain and expend existing markets for Christmas trees; and to carry out programs, plans, and projects designed to provide maximum benefits to the Christmas tree industry" (7 CFR 1214.46(n)). ![]() I'm not too sure how they're going to "expend" existing markets, but I'm sure the government could find a way to use the markets up. I guess it could be a typo and they mean they're gonna "expand" the markets, but that's a little more complicated. It implies that, with TSA-style efficiency, they're going to require people to buy trees, probably with inspectors to come to your home and look through your underwear drawer to make sure you have one. And it won't matter if you're Jewish or 7th Day Adventist or a pagan: you'll be required to have an officially inspected Government And forget about leaving your lights up until July. That's over, buster! And the program of "information" is to include efforts to "enhance the image of Christmas trees and the Christmas tree industry in the United States" (7 CFR 1214.10). ![]() And the inspectors are going to be hard-eyed men and women, highly trained professionals, the products of a major facility to be constructed on the outskirts of Chicago on land graciously provided at a reasonable price by an Obama campaign donor. Woe betide the guy with a 47-inch tree, or Gawd forbid a 46-incher. And none of those plain vanilla white lights. To be properly festive - and nothing will enhance the image of And they've gotta flash! No flashee no enhancee, like they say in Chinese. And blue and white aren't
![]() Acting Administrator Shipman had the temerity to say the 15-cent mandatory Christmas tree fee "is not a tax nor does it yield revenue for the Federal government" (76 CFR 69102). Just because the feds will throw you in jail for not filling out the proper forms and sending in as much money as you can lift doesn't mean it's a tax. And just because the old guy on the corner who sells The Federal government mandates that the But that only sounds like a tax. As Big Guido and Fat Tony would be happy to explain, it's better thought of as ![]() And, we might add, staffed by his relatives, who could be making far more than their six-figure government salaries doing other things. We should be glad they're willing to pitch in the way they are. Mr. President, that's a new 15-cent tax to pay for a Federal program to improve the image and marketing of Christmas trees. Tut tut, my good man! You're sorely misinformed. Perhaps Big Guido and Fat Tony can help you witcher comprehension? Nobody is saying President B.O. doesn't have authority to impose his new Christmas Tree Tax -- his Administration cites the Commodity Promotion, Research and Information Act of 1996. ... which, as every schoolboy knows, gives the President the right and the duty to levy taxes... ![]() Merely your opinion, Bub. The nation needs that 15-cent The economy is barely growing and nine percent of the American people have no jobs. Is a new tax on Christmas trees the best President B.O. can do? And, by the way, the American Christmas tree has a great image that doesn't need any help from the government. Your commentary ill becomes you, sir. Why, the way you describe it, you'd think President B.O. sat down with some of his pals in the White House one day and said "How can we gouge a few more bucks out of an unsuspecting public to piss away on some program that nobody wants or needs so we can get a few more supporters employed?" And this is the best they could come up with?... Oh. Wait. Maybe it did happen that way... Never mind.
| ||||
Posted by:Fred |
#24 Acting Administrator Shipman had the temerity to say the 15-cent mandatory Christmas tree fee "is not a tax nor does it yield revenue for the Federal government" (76 CFR 69102). So it's Shipman's fault. /sarc Dang nab it! It's not a tax, it's a kickback. |
Posted by: Alaska Paul 2011-11-09 21:33 |
#23 Whoa, THE FED HELPED THE REINDEER RUN OVER GRANDMA - D **** NG, I KNEW IT! LOL. |
Posted by: JosephMendiola 2011-11-09 21:09 |
#22 I guess we'll find out how consistent the atheists are about their no government involvement with anything remotely religious. |
Posted by: rjschwarz 2011-11-09 19:42 |
#21 How do you spell Jizya? Is that it? Yep thats the stuff... a per capita tax levied on a section of an Islamic state's non-Muslim citizens, who meet certain criteria. i.e Christians |
Posted by: BrerRabbit 2011-11-09 18:18 |
#20 The Christmas tree is a symbol that has come to be associated with a Christian holiday. Is Obama discriminating against Christianity? What's next a carbon tax on Menorahs? How about a tax on burqas and Islamic religious services? The taxing of praying five times per day, is a good possibility for revenues. |
Posted by: JohnQC 2011-11-09 15:50 |
#19 reports in the past half hour are that the admin will postpone implentation of this 15 cent fee. |
Posted by: Lord Garth 2011-11-09 15:30 |
#18 Hah. I was right. It WAS the Onion. Sorta. |
Posted by: Whiskey Mike 2011-11-09 15:20 |
#17 I don't put up a tree. I put up a Fetivus Pole. Wonder when those will be taxed. |
Posted by: Deacon Blues 2011-11-09 12:22 |
#16 What about a tax on Hanukkah gelt? |
Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2011-11-09 11:13 |
#15 "I" own a plastic tree, I put it up two weeks before Christmas, and leave it up until about a week after. Any such "Tax" will NOT affect me. UP YOURS OBAMA. |
Posted by: Redneck Jim 2011-11-09 10:09 |
#14 Oh Christmas tree Oh Christmas tree Keep the revenues Rolling into me |
Posted by: tu3031 2011-11-09 10:09 |
#13 Seems like there's a separation of church and state issue here. Is the ACLU working this issue? |
Posted by: Nimble Spemble 2011-11-09 09:35 |
#12 Fenestra and pitchforks are more reusable. Branches snap. Calc... statists comprise of bout 25%, so ... that would require about 82.5 million branches and untold reels of cord. It is obvious that won't work. |
Posted by: twobyfour 2011-11-09 09:27 |
#11 Tax, tax and more tax. That is all the government does now days. Time for a Boston Tree Party? |
Posted by: DarthVader 2011-11-09 07:36 |
#10 ..can you say Stamp Tax. When you're a Marxist, you have no need for real history. Just the made up 'interpretations' to rationalize your heartfelt desires. |
Posted by: Procopius2k 2011-11-09 07:04 |
#9 In other news, A plan to adopt the leaf as currency means we'll all be staggeringly rich. |
Posted by: Bright Pebbles 2011-11-09 05:59 |
#8 Not from The Onion? I keep waiting for someone to say "Just kidding! Hah hah, had you going there!". Really, not from The Onion? Really? A Christmas Tree Czar? |
Posted by: Whiskey Mike 2011-11-09 02:30 |
#7 This govt was requested to establish this program by the large producers in the Christmas Tree Industry Don't wont their lots to be occupied? Their accounts audited? |
Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2011-11-09 02:23 |
#6 Geniuses. Add a tax so trees are more expensive, so people buy more artificial ones. Use the tax to promote trees no one wants anymore cuz they are more pricey. I hope that I've got it right. I'm telling ya... Something happened a while ago and we all have been shifted to alternate universe where the Urth is actually an asylum. |
Posted by: twobyfour 2011-11-09 01:41 |
#5 The reason that industry wanted this program was because sales of real trees are down (sales of plastic and trees are up) and the industry thought there might be ways of marketing real trees that will increase demand. They could cut the prices, that would definitely increase demand. Real tree prices got so high I finally switched to an simulated tree, have only have to pay for that once. I've got evergreens all over my yard, keep having to prune them to keep them under control. |
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418 2011-11-09 01:32 |
#4 Forgive my Bilblical ignorance, or is it ignorance OF Biblical proportions -- anyway -- wasn't one of the causes of one of the early Jewish revolts was a Roman tax on trees in the Levant? Israelis' response was to cut down all the trees. |
Posted by: badanov 2011-11-09 01:01 |
#3 So now they are taxing Christmas? With the right marketing, the GOP could win the election on this alone. As for me, I'm going to go sit in the sinktrap to make up for all the bad words I wrote here and then deleted. ...and the horse they rode in on! |
Posted by: SteveS 2011-11-09 00:38 |
#2 the link to the Federal Register is here. This govt was requested to establish this program by the large producers in the Christmas Tree Industry (small producers will be exempt). The govt collects the funds and turns them over to a non govt board that decides how to spend the money. The reason that industry wanted this program was because sales of real trees are down (sales of plastic and trees are up) and the industry thought there might be ways of marketing real trees that will increase demand. The reason why industry has to do this through govt is that if they did it themselves they would be guilty of anti competitive practices; that, is the law prevents them from doing it themselves without going through the govt. Unfortunately a lot of stuff is like this and the problem predates Obama by many years. |
Posted by: Lord Garth 2011-11-09 00:18 |
#1 So those of us that have artificial trees should pay our Christmas tree tax with what; Monopoly money? |
Posted by: USN, Ret. 2011-11-09 00:09 |