You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
India-Pakistan
Afghan talks
2011-10-30
[Dawn] WHILE America continues to stress the importance of moving forward with the US-Pakistain relationship, and especially with the Afghan reconciliation process, complications continue to surface. US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton`s
... sometimes described as The Woman to Call at 3 a.m. and at other times as Mrs. Bill, never as Another Edward Everett ...
congressional testimony on Thursday reiterated some of the messages that came out of her visit to Islamabad earlier this month. For one, while continuing to take a hard line against any Pak support for forces of Evil launching attacks in Afghanistan, it reinforced the positive notes that had been struck regarding the US-Pakistain relationship. She stated Pakistain`s importance for regional stability in very direct language, noting that there is "no solution without Pakistain" and "no stable future" in the region without a US-Pakistain relationship. She also argued that at no point did the CIA chief and the defence secretary suggest ending engagement with Pakistain despite their concerns about the Haqqani network. Second, she repeated earlier statements that the Haqqani network should be squeezed, with Pakistain`s help, even as it is negotiated with. But her testimony broadened US language beyond the Haqqanis, noting that any settlement would have to include the Afghan Taliban head Mullah Omar.
... a minor Pashtun commander in the war against the Soviets who made good as leader of the Taliban. As ruler of Afghanistan, he took the title Leader of the Faithful. The imposition of Pashtunkhwa on the nation institutionalized ignorance and brutality already notable for its own fair share of ignorance and brutality...
But news that came out at the same time from Pakistain`s foreign policy and security establishments indicated how knotty this process is going to be. The Foreign Office raised objections to a draft declaration circulated in advance of the upcoming Istanbul conference on the way forward in Afghanistan. The main issue seems to be the breadth of a contact group proposed by the US, which would include not just Afghanistan`s immediate neighbours but a number of regional players including India and Central Asian states. Meanwhile,
...back at the sea battle, the Terror of the Baltic's career had come to an abrupt and watery end...
the ISPR chief said in a media interview that Pakistain had yet to be informed about any operational details of the reconciliation process, including its road map, who it should talk to and the roles of various stakeholders.

The broader the circle of stakeholders beyond Afghanistan`s immediate neighbours, the more the process will raise concerns among the establishment about Pakistain`s own influence over the outcome and even about national security. And while the foreign minister sounded eager to move forward with the process during Ms Clinton`s visits, the military does not seem to feel that Pakistain has been made as integral a part of the process as America`s public statements would suggest. Nor is this the first time that it has expressed this concern. Taken together, Thursday`s statements indicate some nervousness on Pakistain`s part about the shape the talks will take even as momentum builds towards them.
Posted by:Fred

00:00