You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Fifth Column
Leftists Now Having To Pay Wall St. Protesters $350-$650 A Week
2011-10-10
The Working Families Party (WFP) (www.workingfamiliesparty.org) is New York's most Stalinist energetic, Leninist independent and communist progressive political party. Formed in 1998 by a grassroots coalition of communist community organizations, communist progressive political party. Formed in 1998 by a grassroots coalition of communist neighborhood activists, and communist progressive political party. Formed in 1998 by a grassroots coalition of communist labor unions, we came together to build a society that works for all of us, not just Wall Street CEOs and the well-connected.

WFP is independent from corporate and government funding and in-addition we are communists progressive political party. Formed in 1998 by a grassroots coalition of communist community based; community funded and equally uninfluenced by both major parties. Our agenda focuses on communist progressive political party. Formed in 1998 by a grassroots coalition of communism economic and social justice, corporate accountability, job creation, environmental protection, and investment in education and healthcare.
Posted by:Anonymoose

#10  As per FREEREPUBLIC, iff the COMMUNIST PARTY, USA hopes to "OCCUPY LOS ANGELES", not sure iff US$350 - 650.0 a week is gonna suffice for the former DA ARNUUULD State.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2011-10-10 19:55  

#9  #6 Yuuuup - stranger things have happened in histoire' + all things Machiavellian.

* "How do you solve like a problem like Obama" > D *** NG IT, IS IT JUST ME OR IS ANYONE ELSE SUDDENLY HEARING/HUMMING "THE SOUND OF MUSIC" + "DOE, A DEER, A FEMALE DEER ..."???

just askin.

["LILYS OF THE FIELD" movie here].
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2011-10-10 19:53  

#8  Guess which corporation jumped in to support the Wall Street protesters?

Ben and Jerry's.

I wonder what countries might be interested in giving support.

link
Posted by: Dale   2011-10-10 17:51  

#7  I really enjoy your posts moose.

Regarding OTUS and the CIA. Are we not all assets owned by someone. Are you not owned?

Now, regarding the OWS protestors, many were, I'm sure, on unemployment, so let us gladly shift the burden of their upkeep.

Though it is likely that the taxpayers pay for these people directly or indirectly whether they are unemployed, or acting for the parties and unions or the big corporations and investment firms they protest.

Maybe these protesters will realize after their short stint on Wall Street that they should be inside the buildings where a much larger portion of government money is divided amongst a much smaller group of goons.

Their educations surely were overpriced if they haven't learned that lesson by now though, har har.
Posted by: Ominous1   2011-10-10 15:42  

#6  Anonymoose, you're frightening me. shiver
Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305   2011-10-10 14:21  

#5  Since Obama's maternal grandfather ("the furniture salesman") and his mother both seem to have been wholly owned properties of the CIA, I suspect that the intent with Obama was that he be a deep cover Cold Warrior, able to penetrate the Kremlin itself.

But "How Do You Solve a Problem Like Obama?" With the end of the Cold War, here is a man who can convince anyone that he is a hardcore leftist, with gold plated radical credentials. So why shouldn't the CIA have their own senator?

Among his committee assignments were the International Security subcommittee of Homeland Security and 5 subcommittees in Foreign Relations.

H.W. Bush had been DCIA and become president, so why not allow an agent to become POTUS?
Posted by: Anonymoose   2011-10-10 12:18  

#4  It is doubtful Ebbang. The words "culture" and "Obama" are quite distant, unless you punctuate the language with clicking sounds.
Posted by: Besoeker   2011-10-10 11:54  

#3  Is this how Barack Obama got started?
Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305   2011-10-10 11:46  

#2  You're thinking of Ernst Rahm Röhm.

The actual quote is "Wenn ich Kultur höre ... entsichere ich meinen Browning!" This translates as: "Whenever I hear [the word] 'culture'... I remove the safety from my Browning!"

(This quote is often mistakenly attributed to leading Nazi Hermann Goering, or occasionally to Julius Streicher. This misattribution may date from the famous Frank Capra documentaries (Why We Fight) shown to American troops before shipping out.

In fact, it is a line uttered by the character Thiemann in Act 1, Scene 1 of the play Schlageter, written by Hanns Johst. The association with Nazism is appropriate, as the play was first performed in April 1933, in honor of Hitler's birthday. At the time the word "Browning" was used to refer to any pistol).
Posted by: Anonymoose   2011-10-10 11:38  

#1  To misquote some dead German guy: "When I hear the words 'social justice', I reach for my pistol."
Posted by: SteveS   2011-10-10 10:53  

00:00