| Submit your comments on this article |
| Home Front: Culture Wars |
| U.S. Drug Policy Would Be Imposed Globally By New House Bill |
| 2011-10-07 |
| The House Judiciary Committee passed a bill yesterday that would make it a federal crime for U.S. residents to discuss or plan activities on foreign soil that, if carried out in the U.S., would violate the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) -- even if the planned activities are legal in the countries where they're carried out. The new law, sponsored by Judiciary Committee Chairman Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas) allows prosecutors to bring conspiracy charges against anyone who discusses, plans or advises someone else to engage in any activity that violates the CSA, the massive federal law that prohibits drugs like marijuana and strictly regulates prescription medication. "Under this bill, if a young couple plans a wedding in Amsterdam, and as part of the wedding, they plan to buy the bridal party some marijuana, they would be subject to prosecution," said Bill Piper, director of national affairs for the Drug Policy Alliance, which advocates for reforming the country's drug laws. "The strange thing is that the purchase of and smoking the marijuana while you're there wouldn't be illegal. But this law would make planning the wedding from the U.S. a federal crime." The law could also potentially affect academics and medical professionals. For example, a U.S. doctor who works with overseas doctors or government officials on needle exchange programs could be subject to criminal prosecution. A U.S. resident who advises someone in another country on how to grow marijuana or how to run a medical marijuana dispensary would also be in violation of the new law, even if medical marijuana is legal in the country where the recipient of the advice resides. If interpreted broadly enough, a prosecutor could possibly even charge doctors, academics and policymakers from contributing their expertise to additional experiments like the drug decriminalization project Portugal, which has successfully reduced drug crime, addiction and overdose deaths. The Controlled Substances Act also regulates the distribution of prescription drugs, so something as simple as emailing a friend vacationing in Tijuana some suggestions on where to buy prescription medication over the counter could subject a U.S. resident to criminal prosecution. "It could even be something like advising them where to buy cold medicine overseas that they'd have to show I.D. to get here in the U.S.," Piper says. Conspiracy laws in general are problematic when applied to the drug war. They give prosecutors extraordinary discretion to charge minor players, such as girlfriends or young siblings, with the crimes committed by major drug distributors. They're also easier convictions to win, and can allow prosecutors to navigate around restrictions like statutes of limitations, so long as the old offense can be loosely linked to a newer one. The Smith bill would expand those powers. Under the Amsterdam wedding scenario, anyone who participated in the planning of the wedding with knowledge of the planned pot purchase would be guilty of conspiracy, even if their particular role was limited to buying flowers or booking the hotel. The law is a reaction to a 2007 case in which the 11th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals threw out the convictions of two men who planned the transfer of cocaine from a Colombian drug cartel to a Saudi prince for distribution in Europe. Though the men planned the transaction from Miami, the court found that because the cocaine never reached the U.S. and was never intended to reach the U.S., the men hadn't committed any crime against the United States. It wouldn't be the first time. Over the last several years, a number of executives from online gambling companies have been arrested in U.S. airports and charged with felony violations of U.S. gambling, racketeering and money laundering laws, even though the executives were citizens of and the companies were incorporated in countries where online gambling is legal. |
| Posted by:Anonymoose |
| #7 ...why, the progressive would just 'interpret' it as they felt anyways. |
| Posted by: Procopius2k 2011-10-07 22:41 |
| #6 We need a new Constitution. |
| Posted by: Perfesser 2011-10-07 21:36 |
| #5 In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law,.. - 6th Amendment Part of the slippery slope when they started to extend jurisdiction beyond the sovereign territories of the United States for criminal acts* against Americans. * not to be confused with acts of war. |
| Posted by: Procopius2k 2011-10-07 20:37 |
| #4 This is the kind of sh*t that gets Dim-o-crags elected. F*uck the RINOs |
| Posted by: Iblis 2011-10-07 19:27 |
| #3 This government has overstepped in all aspects of it's legality. We have a third world government now. |
| Posted by: newc 2011-10-07 19:17 |
| #2 Hey Lamar, F@k you and F@k your committee. You are part of the problem, quit being part of the F@kn problem and put the small government guys back on the line. I mean, tits on a turtle, its stuff like this which makes Paul's border fence keeps us in talk sound reasonable. The potential for government abuse has begun the second it passes and will just get worse especially if obamacare sticks. |
| Posted by: swksvolFF 2011-10-07 18:40 |
| #1 Dumb... dumb... dumb... Really, the war on drugs is a failure and furthering this crap just erodes more and more of our rights and makes the police and federal agencies more tyrannical. |
| Posted by: DarthVader 2011-10-07 18:03 |