You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
India-Pakistan
The US is not and never will be at war with Islam: Barack Obama
2011-09-11
By Barack Hussein Obama
Exclusive to the Times of India
An odd choice, but no doubt the president's staff had their reasons.
Posted by:trailing wife

#15  Funny kinda thing...
You get stung by a wasp, well, you try to stay away from them a little bit. But you know what?

You get stung by another wasp, you start squashing them because that made you angry. There was no reason for it. You had been warned and were keeping your distance. Or maybe your wife or child weren't as careful.

Doesn't matter what type or color. You take a swatter to them in the air. You knock down their nests, kill the next generation. You lure them out. When they swarm in anger, break out the RAID, long distance special wasp nuclear version.

When they gather again, hit them with the hose or CO2 or propane. Cyanide smoke when they go underground. Accept some collateral damage to the rats and snakes.
Use a fog bomb in the attic/barn/garage. Turn the sweet world they had going for them into a deadzone.

Look for the queen/ruling class. Bait them with poison. Remove the ability for the tribe to repopulate.

When you've cleaned your house, help your neighbor. Keep his wasps from moving into your neck of the woods.

When you start hearing the angry buzz...
Be vigilant and overwhelming in your response. That's how you deal with wasps.
Posted by: Skidmark   2011-09-11 23:56  

#14  Never is a long time.
Posted by: Skidmark   2011-09-11 23:27  

#13  Well said Barbara.
Posted by: Secret Master   2011-09-11 22:38  

#12  Secret Master - I'm not at war with all Muslims either. I know some wonderful people who just happen to have that religion, and who follow it (except for the jihad and kill-Jews parts), but don't give a rat's behind what other people do.

But I am at war with the islamonazis who want me either dead or wearing a potato sack. And Bambi can go stuff a sock in it.

As to why he said it, I've no doubt it's because it makes him feel superior, and he likes feeling that. :-(
Posted by: Barbara   2011-09-11 20:43  

#11  Maybe you're not, Bambi - but we are.

No offense Barbara, but speak for yourself. I'm at war with certain groups or sects of Muslims, not all of them and certainly not with everyone who calls themselves Muslim. The guy from Turkey who used to drive a drive a delivery van for me? Not at war with him. My childhood friend from Iran whose now a doctor in Pasadena? Not at war with her either.

My problem with Obama's statement is two fold. A) Of course we're not at war with (for example) the Druze, Ishmaeli, Sufi, and quite a lot of other groups and people besides. Why do you feel the need to state it? B) Why do you feel the need to say it right now?
Posted by: Secret Master   2011-09-11 20:20  

#10  Maybe you're not, Bambi - but we are.
Posted by: Barbara   2011-09-11 19:11  

#9  Taliban injure 77 US troops...
Posted by: wr   2011-09-11 14:58  

#8  Give it a nature somewhat heretical to Muslims so they can oppose it without feeling they have to defend Islam. YUP. But it didn't happen then & isn't happening now.
Someone still needs to ask THAT question to the Big Zero. Over and over again.
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418   2011-09-11 12:30  

#7  To quote some guy: you may not be interested in war, but war is interested in you.
Posted by: SteveS   2011-09-11 10:58  

#6  I do believe one of the mistakes made by the Bush team was not framing the enemy properly. All the apologies on behalf of Islam were artificial and pointless and calling the conflict a "War on Terror" spectacularly missed the mark as it provided no actual enemy and we did nothing to stop Hezzbulah the largest terrorist group of the last decade.

I believe Bush should have framed the enemy as Bin Ladenists, another false-Mahdi, like the Mad Mahdi who tore up the Sudan over a century ago. Give it a nature somewhat heretical to Muslims so they can oppose it without feeling they have to defend Islam. Bush should have made it clear that the Bin Ladenist hateful ideology must be stamped out to ensure nobody considered things over when Bin Laden was killed.

He also should have quietly demanded visas from every Muslim nation and triple-checked each before allowing entry. Even if the visas sat in a bin for 6 months the illusion of close scrutiny would have discouraged many. And sealed the border. Do that and a lot of the airport security and other nonsense would have been unnecessary.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2011-09-11 10:24  

#5  tu3031: Somebody should ask him if he thinks Islam's at war with us. I'd love to hear that answer...

You wouldn't think so if you heard his last speech. He would not answer the question, chastise you for being insensitive, then blather about himself for the next two hours.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2011-09-11 09:22  

#4  "The US is not and never will be at war with Islam: Barack Obama"

Obama really seems to have fallen in love with this particular phrase.
Still this statement is both grotesquely stupid and highly dangerous.

No politician can objectively make his nation adhere to a certain policy for all eternity. Obama is making a promise, but he is obviously not powerful enough to keep it. Either he believes his audience is too stupid to notice or he truly believes in his omnipotence.

Second he is given carte blanche to a political player. Whatever 'Islam' does to the US, including but not limited to a genocidal WMD attack, there will be no retaliation. Given this statement, why should any Muslim nation fear the consequences of any belligerent action?
Why should a nuclear Iran feel deterred?

With this one phrase Obama has combined a display of stupidity with an insult to the audience and as a bonus he has officially repudiated deterrence.
Posted by: Elmolugum Omeque4519   2011-09-11 05:26  

#3  POTUS BAMMER

versus

* DEFENCE.PK/FORUMS > AL-QAEDA'S NEW CHIEF AYMAN AL-ZAWAHIRI WANTS A 9-11 OF HIS OWN, ostensib to help himself "cement" his newfound position + control, etc. oer the group + network.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2011-09-11 00:57  

#2  Somebody should ask him if he thinks Islam's at war with us. I'd love to hear that answer...
Posted by: tu3031   2011-09-11 00:37  

#1  And ISLAM = RADICAL ISLAM, vee agz the US???

* ION NEWSMAX > AHEAD OF 9-11, [Afghan]TALIBAN VOW TO NEVER STOP FIGHTING, to get the US-NATO out of Afghanistan, + wish to remind the US-NATO/West that their group was NOT involved in the 9-11 attcks + conspiracy.

* SAME > AP: BLAIR SAYS POST-9-11 BATTLE NOT OVER.

IIUC, BLAIR = A Military Struggle such as the GWOT must be complemented or supported by effec Nation-Building + winning "Hearts-N-Minds", which BLai infers has NOT been achieved despite US-NATO/Coalition successes

RELATED > DEFENCE.PK/FORUMS = EX-UK PM TONY BLAIR CALLS FOR REGIME CHANGE IN IRAN + SYRIA.

ITS GONN TAKE TIME, $$$ + WORK TO BUILD A DEMOCRATIC MUSLIM MIDDLE EAST, as "nation-building" in post-Soviet Eastern Europe is subjectively NOT the same as nation-building in historically anti-democratic or non-democratic Muslim nations.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2011-09-11 00:27  

00:00