Submit your comments on this article |
Home Front: Politix |
Obamateurism of the Day |
2011-09-08 |
![]() Incidentally, the report that the administration official cited as “outside validation” for the 95 percent statistic just mentioned it as an aside. We checked with one of the co-authors, and he said the source for the figure was a White House fact sheet. The CBPP was embarrassed enough at the regurgitation of political talking points to have avoided footnoting the claim in the report, which is why Kessler had to ask one of the two authors for the citation. That’s doubly ironic, since the article intended to push back against “misconceptions” about how many people pay federal income tax, and the authors ended up propagating more nonsense instead. Still, I’m not sure which is worse — the fact that Obama’s team tried to bolster their argument by having the Center for Budget and Policy Priorities launder a talking point on their behalf, or that it took the national news media months to ask where the CBPP got their data. |
Posted by:DarthVader |
#2 I’m not sure which is worse — the fact that Obama’s team tried to bolster their argument by having the Center for Budget and Policy Priorities launder a talking point on their behalf I don't think the administration had to twist arms |
Posted by: Pappy 2011-09-08 15:06 |
#1 Obama ought to work for T$A as much as he is groping. |
Posted by: JohnQC 2011-09-08 14:44 |