You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Afghanistan
General Petraeus steps down in Afghanistan
2011-07-19
[Dawn] General David Petraeus, the US commander in Afghanistan and most celebrated military leader of his generation, stepped down on Monday after a checkered year at the helm of what is America's longest war.

At a ceremony in Kabul Petraeus passed the baton to John Allen, a former subordinate who made his name in Iraq by striking tribal alliances considered integral in reversing Al-Qaeda's momentum after years of appalling violence.

Petraeus oversaw a surge of tens of thousands of troops into Afghanistan in a last-ditch bid to reverse a nearly 10-year Taliban insurgency and although he has claimed some progress, violence remains at record highs.

He is leaving to head up the CIA, after a week in which Afghanistan's Caped President Hamid Maybe I'll join the Taliban Karzai
... A former Baltimore restaurateur, now 12th and current President of Afghanistan, displacing the legitimate president Rabbani in December 2004. He was installed as the dominant political figure after the removal of the Taliban regime in late 2001 in a vain attempt to put a Pashtun face on the successor state to the Taliban. After the 2004 presidential election, he was declared president regardless of what the actual vote count was. He won a second, even more dubious, five-year-term after the 2009 presidential election. His grip on reality has been slipping steadily since around 2007, probably from heavy drug use...
saw his younger brother and a key aide assassinated at their homes, and as NATO
...the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. Originally it was a mutual defense pact directed against an expansionist Soviet Union. In later years it evolved into a mechanism for picking the American pocket while criticizing the style of the American pants...
began transitioning areas of the country to Afghan control.

Washington has now started to draw down troop numbers under a controversial timetable, which Petraeus has admitted he did not recommend, that has attracted widespread criticism for being too fast to hold onto tentative gains.

Celebrated in Washington for turning around the war in Iraq, Petraeus' legacy in Afghanistan, however, has been less clear.

Despite the surge, UN statistics released last week show that 1,462 civilians died in the first six months of 2011, an increase of 15 percent, and putting this year on track to be the deadliest in a decade.

Last Tuesday's killing of Ahmed Wali Karzai, probably the most powerful man in southern Afghanistan and younger half-brother of the Afghan president, has also been considered a threat to US gains against the Taliban in Kandahar.

Last night's killing of his senior adviser Jan Mohammad Khan, a former governor of southern Uruzgan province, in a raid on his Kabul home, has also been seen as another loss for the president.

The Taliban grabbed credit for both the killings.

Petraeus took charge in Afghanistan in extraordinary circumstances after US President Barack B.O. Obama sacked his predecessor, Stanley McChrystal, over scathing remarks made to Rolling Stone magazine about the White House administration.

He oversaw his trademark counter-insurgency teachings, which were deemed to have been so successful in Iraq, backed by a buildup of more than 30,000 extra American troops, now due to go home by the end of 2012.

But although the military is seen to have inflicted heavy casualties among the Taliban, particularly in the south, it has struggled to harness a tribal "awakening" of the type so instrumental in Iraq.

One day before Petraeus stepped down, a ceremony was held in central Bamyan province marking the start of a security transition from NATO to Afghan forces, a process that will see the departure of all foreign troops by 2014.

Analysts have already warned that the killing of Wali Karzai may trigger a pie fight for control of the critical southern heartland that could embolden the Taliban and reverse NATO gains.

The killings -- and a Taliban attack on the Intercontinental hotel in the heart of Kabul last month that left 21 dead -- have fuelled doubts about the readiness of Afghans to manage national security.

After nearly 10 years of war, there are still around 150,000 foreign troops in Afghanistan, including nearly 100,000 from the United States.
Posted by:Fred

#4  "Embolden the Taliban + reverse NATO gains" > see also DEFENCE.PK/FORUMS > ESCOBAR: PAKISTAN, NOT AFGHANISTAN, IS US' TOP WAR IN REGION DUE TO QAEDA PRESENCE, PAKISTAN WANTS RETURN OF [pro-Pak]TALIBAN CONTROL IN AFGANISTAN.

versus

* IIRC WAFF [old = paraph] > US TO RESUME MILITARY AID TO THE TALIBAN - ERRR, PAKISTAN GOVT-ARMY [SAME THING].

* INDIAN DEFENCE FORUM > PAKISTAN LeT SUFFER MAJOR BLOW AS [five] TOP COMMANDERS ARE KILLED, to include from the aligned JeM Group after a major gun battle wid combined Army-Police task force in north Kashmir.

* SAME > CIA TO RESUME NORMAL OPERATIONS IN PAKISTAN, after Pak approves 87 new visas for Agency sleuths.

Islamabad = PAK Taliban, + the Pak Taliban = Pakistan Govt-Army, perhaps though exclusive of Mullah Omar's AFGHAN TALIBAN due to the latters pledge of non-intervention in the Pak Taliban's fight agz the US-NATO + "Islamabad" [Political-Govt Taliban]???

AS CLEAR AS DAY, THEY TELL YA, AS CLEAR AS US DEBT IS US$14.33TRILYUHN OR US$14.84TRILYUHN.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2011-07-19 23:22  

#3  The CIA was certainly a powerful tool in the destruction of the last President.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2011-07-19 21:35  

#2  Hopefully, Leon didn't leave him a letter advising him to write two letters.
Posted by: Pollyandrew   2011-07-19 18:03  

#1  I am very curious what he will be like as DCIA.

Most of those sent in to "reform" the CIA fail, as they try to struggle against extremely massive institutional inertia.

But I suspect that if he is wise, he will first reorder his staff in a more C&GS manner. This will result in improved administrative efficiency, which bureaucrats notice and appreciate. This works well as institutional "lubricant", because nothing succeeds like success.

That is, if he first shows he is good for the organization, there will be a lot more willingness to let him make changes. And if they work, then he is golden.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2011-07-19 16:48  

00:00