Submit your comments on this article |
Bangladesh |
Islamic scholars: Let fatwa prevail |
2011-04-28 |
![]() Fatwa is part and parcel of Islam, Islamic culture and its principle, the scholars said while placing their opinions before the Appellate Division during the hearing of an appeal that challenged the 2001 HC verdict. The scholars are Mufti Mizanur Rahman Sayed, Mufti Kefayet Ullah, Mufti Ruhul Amin, Mufti Kafil Uddin Sarkar and Dr Abdullah Maruf. The director general of Islamic Foundation Bangladesh selected them for giving statements on the status and application of fatwa to the apex court as per its earlier directive. A six-member Appellate Division bench, headed by Chief Justice ABM Khairul Haque, will continue hearing today. The scholars yesterday told the court that fatwa is a means of interpreting Islamic principles. It has been playing a vital role for centuries in answering questions raised by Mohammedan believers, they said, adding that fatwa is related to the existence of Mohammedans. Only the scholarly persons, who have vast knowledge on Islamic jurisprudence, can be allowed to give fatwa, they said. If fatwa is banned, the principles of the Holy Koran and Sunnah will be affected, the scholars said. They, however, said the abuse of fatwa is a different factor, which has to be stopped by the law enforcers, administration and court. On January 1, 2001, the HC declared illegal all punishments imposed in the name of fatwa after a hearing on a suo moto ruling of the HC. The court issued the ruling following a newspaper report on hilla marriage (marriage with a third person). Mufti Mohammad Toyeeb and Abul Kalam Azad challenged the verdict at the SC the same year. |
Posted by:Fred |
#3 This is what makes Islam incompatible with democracy. These clerics want the kind of power that, in a democracy, is only granted to elected officials and their appointees. But the clerics don't want to stand for election...they might lose. |
Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305 2011-04-28 13:39 |
#2 This is nothing other than a power play, so the court should subvert it by permitting fatwas to be introduced in the manner of a "friend of the court" brief, submitted by the attorney for the religious scholars, but leaving the final decision up the the court. That nails them in several different directions. First, it takes away any direct powers they have. Second, their brief must be in legalese, not in Koranic doublespeak. Third, it must be presented by an officer of the court, their attorney, not one of them. And fourth, the court is not bound in any way by what they said. |
Posted by: Anonymoose 2011-04-28 11:24 |
#1 saying that fatwa cannot be stopped Charles Martel wouldn't agree. |
Posted by: gr(o)mgoru 2011-04-28 03:06 |