You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Arabia
Saudis Forming Anti-Iran War Coalition
2011-04-19
(Debka, so salt)
After giving up on US and Israel ever confronting Iran, Saudi Arabia has placed itself at the forefront of an independent Sunni campaign for cutting down the Islamic Republic's drive for a nuclear bomb and its expansionist meddling in Arab countries.

Two US emissaries sent to intercede with Saudi King Abdullah -- US Defense Secretary Robert Gates on April 6 and National Security Adviser Tom Donilon, who arrived in Riyadh six days later -- were told that Saudi Arabia had reached a parting-of-the ways with Washington, followed actively by Kuwait, Bahrain and Oman.

King Abdullah first defied the Obama administration's policy of support for popular uprisings against autocratic Arab regimes on March 14 by sending Saudi troops into Bahrain to prop up the king against the Shiite-led disturbances organized by Tehran's Lebanese surrogate, Hizballah.

This force has been expanded continuously, split now between units suppressing the uprising and the bulk deployed on the island's coast, 320 kilometers from the shore of Iran.

Saudi ground-to-ground and anti-air missiles have been transferred to the Bahraini capital of Manama and naval units, including missile vessels, positioned in its harbor.

Bahraini Foreign Minister Khalid bin Ahmed Al Khalifa announced that Saudi and allied GCC troops would stay in the kingdom until Iran no longer poses a menace. "Gulf force is needed to counter a sustained campaign by Iran in Bahrain," he said.

Saudi Arabia was therefore determined to lead the Gulf region on the road to a confrontation with Iran -- up to and including military action if necessary -- to defend the oil emirates against Iranian conspiracies in the pursuit of which the king accused US-led diplomacy of giving Tehran a clear field.

Monday, April 18, the foreign ministers of the Gulf Cooperation Council, GCC, asked the UN Security Council to take action for stopping Iran's "provocative interference in their countries' domestic affairs." This "flagrant interference" posed a "grave security to, and risked flaring up sectarian strike, in the GCC countries."

The resolution went on to state: "The GCC will not hesitate to adopt whatever measures and policies they deem necessary vis-à-vis the foreign interferences in their internal affairs."

The phrase "measures and policies deemed necessary" is diplomatic parlance for a military threat.

It implies that Saudi Arabia and the rest of the regional group are confident that together, they command the strategic resources and assets necessary for a military strike against Iran. Our military sources report that the Saudis are convinced that their combined missile, air force and naval strength is fully capable of inflicting in-depth damage on mainland Iran.

Iran's response: Thousands of Iranian students, mobilized by the Revolutionary Guards and Basijj voluntary corps have laid the Saudi embassy in Tehran to siege for most of the past week, launching stone and firebomb assaults from time to time, but so far making no attempt to invade the building.

Then, Saturday, April 16, the Iranian foreign ministry summoned the Pakistani chargé d'affaires to warn him sternly against allowing Saudi Arabia and Bahrain to continue conscripting Pakistani military personnel.

Tehran claims that by offering exorbitant paychecks, Riyadh has raised 1,000 Pakistani recruits for its military operation in support of the Bahraini king and another 1,500 are on their way to the Gulf.

Iran also beefed up its strength along the Pakistani border to warn Islamabad that if it matters come to a clash with Saudi Arabia, Pakistani and its military will not escape punishment.

Tehran-Sunni tensions are rippling into other arenas: On April 11-12, the chronically disaffected Arabs of Ahwaz in the western Iranian province of Khuzestan (1.2 million inhabitants) staged a two-day uprising against the Iranian government.

In their first crackdown, government forces killed at least 15 demonstrators before cutting off Ahwaz's links with the outside world.'

So too does Syrian president Bashar Assad, who claims the spreading revolt against his regime, now entering its second month, was instigated from Riyadh.
In the event of such a war, Bahrain and Riyadh would in effect be shielded from Iranian missiles by any US 5th fleet assets in the area, who would have to assume it was an attack on themselves as well.
Posted by:Anonymoose

#13  You should worry more about Iraq getting nice with Iran.

The Axis of Shiiaism.
Posted by: phil_b   2011-04-19 22:34  

#12  #8 Beso, Soddies contributed financially to Paki nukes, did they not? I would not be surprised if they felt some degree of entitlement, manifesting one way or another.

Yes, but the financial assists and nuclear research efforts went totally undetected by our counter-proliferation intelligence agencies until seismic monitors began to peg the huge surface craters appeared.
Posted by: Besoeker   2011-04-19 22:33  

#11  Importantly, Egypt is for unknown reasons getting nice with Tehran, which is a trout in the milk.

My guess is that an Islamist faction of the Egyptian Army is in charge. The Muslim masses do love Iran - they see it as the one Muslim country willing to poke Uncle Sam in the eye. A democratic Egypt could be more stridently anti-American than Iran. Whether it will stoop to engineering a 9/11-style attack like Pakistan is another matter.
Posted by: Zhang Fei   2011-04-19 22:29  

#10  "Add Bacon of course!"

DanNY, that works for me, but grom's mileage might vary, considering where he lives.

Just sayin'
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2011-04-19 22:28  

#9  DanNY - mmmmmm bacon. I like the way you think :-)
Posted by: Frank G   2011-04-19 22:20  

#8  Beso, Soddies contributed financially to Paki nukes, did they not? I would not be surprised if they felt some degree of entitlement, manifesting one way or another.

There is an old prophecy that Mecca will be vaporized by light brighter than 1000 suns and originating from the east. It does not say much about Qom, but ME mindset is thoroughly reciprocal. It always puzzled me, the origin of the bottled sunshine, that is. Well... it may be prudent to resupply my pantry with lotsa popcorn.

Posted by: twobyfour   2011-04-19 22:11  

#7  Special Popcorn?

Add Bacon of course!
Posted by: DanNY   2011-04-19 21:51  

#6  All that is needed now is a Chinese missile salesman to turn up.... OH WAIT!
Posted by: Besoeker   2011-04-19 20:54  

#5  I'm starting to think that the Saudis are deliberately causing oil prices to rise in order to ensure that Obama loses in 2012, because they're not sure the al Saud clan can survive another 4 years of Obama (the Saudis and us both).

Interesting thought Zhang Fei. You might be right. Saudis royalty is also are very afraid of Iran's growing nuclear threat. Also there is the Sunni vs. Shia tensions.
Posted by: JohnQC   2011-04-19 18:20  

#4  "I need suggestions for special popcorn."

After buttering and salting, try tossing with fresh-grated parmesan, grom.

Also, try a little cayenne mixed in with the salt, or the butter.

Enjoy. :-D
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2011-04-19 17:56  

#3  It would be weird if the al Sauds ended up destroying the Iranian nuclear program. Obama's reluctance to act may end up costing him re-election. I'm starting to think that the Saudis are deliberately causing oil prices to rise in order to ensure that Obama loses in 2012, because they're not sure the al Saud clan can survive another 4 years of Obama (the Saudis and us both).
Posted by: Zhang Fei   2011-04-19 15:56  

#2  I need suggestions for special popcorn.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2011-04-19 15:47  

#1  Importantly, Egypt is for unknown reasons getting nice with Tehran, which is a trout in the milk.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2011-04-19 15:43  

00:00