You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
China-Japan-Koreas
Koreas hold first military talks since island attack
2011-02-09
(KUNA) -- Military officers from South and North Korea began preliminary talks Tuesday to lay groundwork for a higher-level meeting, Yonhap News Agency reported, citing a Defense Ministry front man.

The talks are the first between the countries since the North's deadly bombardment of a South Korean border island.

The talks at the border truce village of Panmunjom recessed as of 10:54 a.m. (0154 GMT) after nearly an hour-long morning session, Kim Min-seok, a front man at the South's Defense Ministry, said in Seoul.

The two sides resumed the talks at 2 p.m. (0500 GMT). "Both sides have been discussing the agenda and process for a higher-level meeting," Kim was quoted as saying. "The atmosphere was serious, and there were no political arguments from the two sides." The colonel-level talks are aimed at setting the date, place and agenda for higher-level talks, possibly at the level of defense ministers.

But the South's Defense Ministry said it won't agree to ministerial-level talks unless North Korea apologizes and takes "responsible measures" for the November 23, shelling of Yeonpyeong Island and the torpedo attack of a South Korean warship last March.

"Our stance has not changed," Kim told news hounds earlier in the day. "A higher-level military meeting will be possible only if North Korea takes responsible measures for the attacks on Yeonpyeong Island and the warship and promises not to carry out any more provocations." Tensions persist on the Korean Peninsula after the North's artillery strike on Yeonpyeong Island killed two marines and two civilians.

The bombardment came after a multinational investigation concluded that North Korea torpedoed a South Korean warship, killing 46 sailors.

North Korea has so far denied any involvement in the torpedo attack of the warship. The nation has also claimed that its artillery attack on Yeonpyeong was legitimate because the South provoked first by holding a live-fire drill near the island with some shells falling on the North's side.
Posted by:Fred

#6  PEOPLE'S DAILY FORUM/TOPIX > VARIOUS > TALKS BETWEEN TWO KOREAS HAVE "COLLAPSED" + NORTH KOREA WALKS OUT ON TALKS WID SOUTH.

Collapsed oer specific details, e.e ROK wanted to talk about the two Mil Incidents, "Cheonan" + "Yeongpyeong", while the DPRK repor did NOT.

* Also from TOPIX > NORTH KOREA PROPOSES PARLIAMENTARY TALKS WID SOUTH.

* SAME > SOURCES: NORTH KOREA ASKS US TO RESTORE FOOD AID, as suspended since March 2009; + SOURCES: PYONGYANG BEGS FOR FOOD AROUND THE WORLD.

ARTIC = denotes that its become EASIER TO COUNT OF NUMBER OF INTERNAT COUNTRIES WHOM HAVE NOT RECEIVED FORMAL NORTH KOREA REQUESTS FOR FOOD AID, THAN THE CONTRARY.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2011-02-09 23:33  

#5   IMO the DPRK-ROK talks won't succeed unless China sees good or strong signs that the US will reduce or eliminate its mil presence in the Near-Term

I thought we reduced U.S. troops in South Korea by 11,000 and pulled the remainder south of Seoul to that island?
Posted by: trailing wife   2011-02-09 21:42  

#4  This how the NKs negotiate: deny everything and blame the SKs and US. Its a non-starter folks.
Posted by: Goober Glearong9707   2011-02-09 19:44  

#3  * ION TOPIX > RUSSIA AKSKS JAPAN TO INVESTIGATE FLAG-INSULT [burning] CASE IN TOKYO.

Hey Joe, Japanese were pissed off about Medvedev's recent visit to the Kurils.
Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305   2011-02-09 12:16  

#2  Lucianne already has a link to an article saying the talks have broken up.
Posted by: Sonny Clack6634   2011-02-09 12:05  

#1  IMO the DPRK-ROK talks won't succeed unless China sees good or strong signs that the US will reduce or eliminate its mil presence in the Near-Term as per South Korea + Japan. IFF THE US DOES NOT, THEN EXPECT THE NORTH TO INITIATE NEW + WORSE PDENIABLE MIL INCIDENTS THAN "CHEONAN" + "YEONGPYEONG", IFF NOT OUTRIGHT MIL STRIKES AGZ US-ROK TARGETS.

Again, THE DPRK = NORTH KOREA WANTS TO STOP STARVING, WHIEL RISING CHINA WANTS SOLE BASE RIGHTS VEE THE "FIRST ISLAND CHAIN". In the absence of clear US Milfors withdrawal from East Asia region, IMO CHIna is unlikely to accept more than TOKEN = LIMITED NORTH-SOUTH ECON COOPERATION/INTEGRATION - THE TWO KOREAS CAN FORGET ABOUT RE-UNIFICATION. THE DPRK WILL GO ON STARVING.

* ION TOPIX > RUSSIA AKSKS JAPAN TO INVESTIGATE FLAG-INSULT [burning] CASE IN TOKYO.

* SAME > AIDE: RUSSIAN FEDERATION [RF] SOVEREIGNTY OVER KURILE ISLANDS CANNOT BE SUBJECT TO REVISION [Russ Review-N-Revise].

* SAME > [Itar-Tass] JAPANESE RALLY FOR RETURN OF DISPUTED NEW TERRITORIES, URGE VISA_FREE EXCHANGES.

* SAME > [Pravda] JAPAN CLAIMS TO RUSSIAN ISLANDS EVOLVE INTO BLIND RAGE.

* CHINESE MILITARY FORUM > AUSTRALIA: WE WANT A LARGER SUBMARINE FORCE THAN CHINA HAS | NEED OR NOT, WE NEED MORE PRE-FAB SUBS [Foreign-built, as its too $$$ costly for Australia at this time to build its own].

Aussies believe Rising China's ambition + Mil Planning is akin to WW2 JAPAN'S BEFORE IT ATTACKED THE US BASE AT PEARL HARBOR in DEC 1941, + that China hence intends to ultimately expand its STRATEGIC MIL REACH TO NEAR AUSTRALIA + SOPAC/SOUPAC LITTORAL REGIONS.

Again, IMO CHINA GAINED NOTHING SAVE MORE HEADACHES VIA RUSSIA'S DECLARATION OF PERMANENT SOVEREIGNTY OER FORMER JAPANESE = SOUTH KURILES, + that China will closely watch the outcome of US-JAPAN TALKS OER THE RELOCATION OF US MARINES TO GUAM FROM OKINAWA, + of course as per Taiwan.

IFF NORTH KOREA + CHIINA both don't get what they want, WATCH OUT!
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2011-02-09 01:00  

00:00