You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Culture Wars
Breakthrough Laser Could Revolutionize Navy's Anti-Missile Weaponry
2011-01-21
The Navy has passed a major milestone in its quest to build an incredibly powerful new anti-aircraft gun.

Scientists with the Navy's Office of Naval Research have demonstrated a prototype system capable of producing from thin air the electrons needed to generate ultrapowerful, "megawatt-class" laser beams for the agency's next-generation system.

"The injector performed as we predicted all along," said Dinh Nguyen, senior project leader for the Free Electron Laser (FEL) program at the Los Alamos National Lab, N.M. "But until now, we didn't have the evidence to support our models. We were so happy to see our design, fabrication and testing efforts finally come to fruition."

He said the group is hoping to set a world record with the futuristic new weapon -- which could be the Holy Grail of military lasers.

FEL technology generates powerful laser beams by passing a stream of electrons -- those tiny, charged particles of matter -- through magnetic fields. Using electrons means avoiding the hassle of chemical fuels that are required for ordinary gas lasers, and bypassing the heating issue of electronic lasers.
Producing a laser without the energy required to heat up the gas is a major breakthrough. They can get more bang for the electric buck, shoot faster and adjust the beam better than the old versions. If this works out, old school missiles like the Harpoon and Silkworm are instantly worthless (unless fired in the thousands at one target). This will take a huge advantage away from Iran in trying to close the gulf with their Chinese silkworms.

Oh... and I have to say it.
Pew! Pew! Pew! Pew! Pew! Pew! Pew! Pew!
Posted by:DarthVader

#8  NORTH KOREA may also have a RESERVE NUCLEAR SITE in case of outside attack by US-ALLIES, like IRAN.

* WMF > DEFECTOR: NORTH KOREA"S INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX AT HUICHON/XI CHUAN USED FOR BOTH HYDROPOWER + MANUFACTURE OF URANIUM CENTRIFUGES, + CAN EASILY BE CONVERTED AT ANY TIME IN FUTURE INTO A SECURE ALTERNATE SITE [besides YONGYBON] FOR THE PRODUCTION OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS.

----------

The USAF-DOD is already considering developing of LR UNMANNED ABL DRONES - the real worry for Russia + China, etc. would be iff the US puts reliable BMD Lasers up in relatively slow but heavily protected UNMANNED, NON CONUS-BASED ORBITING DIRIGIBLES, IN "FIXED" = ROUTINE PATROL AREAS HIGH ABOVE THE EARTH'S SURFACE. Russia + China consider same as DESTABILIZING COMPARED TO CONUS-BASED, MANNED OR UV DRONE, "RE-CALL CAPABLE" AIR, SEA PLATFORMS ALA GLOBAL MISSLE DEFENSE + "GLOBAL PROMPT STRIKE" + future SPACE STRIKE.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2011-01-22 00:20  

#7  hmmm I think the first 19:55 comment may be a fake, but the second 19:55 comment bears all the hallmarks of a Joe M rant. Ima thinkrn Joe's been cloned, but the clone hasn't been named yet
Posted by: Frank G   2011-01-21 19:59  

#6  Reliable + accurate GMD-TMD capability is the future for all of the USDOD Armed Services, besides also Unmanned New Technologies + "Battlespace" INtegrated Warfare.

Gaaawd I miss Aberdeen + DARPA.

* "Avoid the hassle of chemical fuels" > IMO read, ANTI-"PEAK OIL" + OTHER.

Ala BP DEEPWATER HORIZON + GULF OF MEXICO, hopefully the USDOD + US-World Perts are double-triple-checking their Math + Models, etc. as per "PEAK OIL/ENERGY/RESOURCES".

BECUZ, AMONG OTHER, "GLOBALISM" + BY EXTENSION THE OWG-NWO THAT NO AMERICAN HAS YET VOTED FOR WILL DE FACTO FAIL 2030-2100 IFF THE SAME ARE WRONG.

But I digress ...
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2011-01-21 19:55  

#5  Well, according to a few remarks Dr. Lowell Wood made back during the SDI heyday, all making your missile shiny would do is cost you a lot of money. Lasers would still punch through it and having a mirror shiny enough to actually reflect lasers isn't going to survive launch or being struck by a weapons grade laser.

While any point defense system can be overwhelmed, there fast becomes a point of diminishing returns as the sheer amount of resources to kill one or two ships is simply going to be too much. Yes, you can build 200 missiles to launch at a single target, but remember you must also have crews to launch them, launchers, maintenance so that they are ready when the time comes and some method of directing the missiles to the target. And if you want to harden them so a B-2 doesn't carpet bomb your launchers with cluster bombs, the price tag goes way up.
Posted by: Silentbrick - Lost Drill Bit Division - Halliburton   2011-01-21 19:44  

#4  What if they mirror-plate the missiles?
Posted by: Lowspark   2011-01-21 17:57  

#3  No,
The electrons change direction in a magnetic field and thus release coherent photons with a frequency related to the velocity of change.

So light still hits the target.
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2011-01-21 15:43  

#2  I wonder why they are calling it a laser? It sounds like a Charged Particle Beam. CPBs use lased electrons, alpha particles, or hydrogen ions, instead of lased photons as in typical lasers.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2011-01-21 15:12  

#1  I wonder if such a laser beam couldn't be used to "steer" a dumb projectile to a target by affecting the atmosphere around the projectile.
Posted by: gorb   2011-01-21 13:40  

00:00