You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Britain
Assange 'faces death penalty' in US
2011-01-14
[Al Jazeera] Defence attorneys for Julian Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks, has said he could end up facing the death penalty in the US if the UK extradites him to Sweden, where he is accused of sex crimes.
I doubt he'd get the death penalty. But he wouldn't like Leavenworth.
The lawyers fear that Sweden will in turn hand him over to the US.

Following Assange's appearance in a London court on Tuesday, his attorneys published an outline of the defence he will use at a full extradition hearing scheduled for February 7.

"There is a real risk that, if extradited to Sweden, the US will seek his extradition and/or illegal rendition to the USA, where there will be a real risk of him being nabbed at Guantanamo Bay or elsewhere" according to a legal memo on the website of the law firm Finers Stephens Innocent.

"Indeed, if Mr Assange were rendered to the USA, without assurances that the death penalty would not be carried out, there is a real risk that he could be made subject to the death penalty."

The Australian citizen, who has angered the US and other states by releasing embarrassing classified US diplomatic cables, is wanted by Sweden for questioning over alleged sexual offences against two women in Sweden last summer.

According to his lawyer, the allegations stem from a dispute over "consensual but unprotected sex".

The legal memo added that if Assange ended up in the US, there is "a real risk" he would be subject to ill-treatment or even torture.
The risk that he won't be is what disturbs a lot of us.
The US has not yet filed any charges against Assange, but officials are investigating whether he can be prosecuted under American espionage laws. Under a legal agreement on extraditions between Sweden and the US, Assange would have to be charged in the US with a crime carrying a minimum of two-year prison term under both countries' laws. Military or political crimes are not valid grounds for extradition.

As Assange would first have to be extradited from the UK to Sweden, the latter cannot extradite him to a third country unless the UK gives its approval.

Extraditions from Sweden to countries outside the European Union are relatively rare. Between 2007-2009, 14 people were extradited to countries outside the EU and the Nordic Countries.

The Swedish government takes the final decision on extraditions, and can decide not to have a person handed over even if there is legal ground for it. However,
The infamous However...
the government cannot have someone extradited if the legal requirements are not met.

Under European human rights
... which are not the same thing as individual rights, mind you...
conventions, the government cannot extradite a person to a country where the individual may face death penalty or ill-treatment.

Pointing to a dent in Sweden's laxity human rights record, Assange's lawyers mentioned a case in 2001 in which two asylum seekers were deported from Sweden.

The Swedish government was heavily criticised both domestically and by the UN human rights committee for the rough treatment of Ahmed Agiza and Muhammad Al-Zery, who the Swedish intelligence agency suspected of having links to an al-Qaeda affiliated organisation.

Before the deportation, Sweden had negotiated guarantees from Egypt that the men would not be tortured or executed. However,
Another infamous However...
strong allegations emerged that both men were tortured after they were transported to Egypt in a CIA plane with masked American agents.
If they were masked, they could have been Ruritanians.
Posted by:Fred

#9  #8He's got another scalp on his belt.
Posted by: tipper


where's Anon1 with her heaving defense of Assange? There's blood on the ticket, coating previous blood
Posted by: Frank G   2011-01-14 22:30  

#8  He's got another scalp on his belt.
Posted by: tipper   2011-01-14 22:16  

#7  Julian deserves a severe penalty if he conspired with Manning to leak U.S. secret material.

I bet Manning thinks they are pals. Butt-buddies working together to make the world wonderful -- rainbows above dancing unicorns.

Julian ought worry about what his buddy might say on the stand. About how they worked together. To get the truth out of the closet and into the light of day.

On the internet together; late at night; sharing encryption keys. O, the joy of it all. The two of them, together.

You know Julian saw what Manning was delivering. You know he sent back an encouraging note. You know he asked for info on older events that a 20 year old private didn't care about because they had happened when he was 4, but Julian was 24 then and knew what he wanted. You know Julian led his boy-toy on and on, just to get access to another vein of information. He had blown out earlier veins too soon, so he waited and cajoled and whispered. Just to get a little bit more.

Eventually, Julian became so over-stuffed from his feast he could no longer hold it in. It just started vomiting up on the internet, and he continues to this day. He pukes and pukes without regard to the broken little toy rotting away in the brig, who filled him up.

Julian is right to fear the long arm of the United States, but he really should avoid mirrors, as they show the terrifying horror that is Julian Assange, a soulless wreak tempting the foolish to sacrifice their lives in his empty temple.
Posted by: rammer   2011-01-14 22:06  

#6  Preaching to the choir. They're the only ones buying this bullshit.
Posted by: tu3031   2011-01-14 20:04  

#5  Like I said earlier, Gitmo has become the boogeyman of the left. They think that anyone can be sent there, never to be seen or heard of again.

Actually, a large number of people have been released from Gitmo. Many of them have returned to their Jihadi ways. Several of those have ended up dead.
Posted by: Rambler in Virginia   2011-01-14 18:25  

#4  Assange....in Gitmo?

That has to be someone's bizarre fantasy, right?
Posted by: Swamp Blondie   2011-01-14 17:16  

#3  That's not a "She' that's the torturers apprentice from "The Princess Bride". (A damn good movie, if you haven't seen it, do so.)
Posted by: Redneck Jim   2011-01-14 13:14  

#2  I saw that face at the PX yesterday. She drew several admiring glances from some of the older contractors.
Posted by: Besoeker   2011-01-14 07:59  

#1  I think that picture looks more like Nancy Grace.
Posted by: Fornerly Dan   2011-01-14 07:27  

00:00