You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
India-Pakistan
Three US missiles kill 54 in Pakistan
2010-12-18
[Dawn] Three American missile attacks killed 54 alleged snuffies Friday close to the Afghan border, an unusually high number of victims that included commanders of a Taliban-allied group that were holding a meeting, Pak officials said.

The attacks took place in the Khyber tribal region, which has been rarely struck by American missiles before over the last three years. That could indicate a possible expansion of the CIA-led covert campaign of drone strikes inside Pak territory.

The first strike targeted two vehicles in the Sandana area of the Tirah Valley, killing seven snuffies and wounding another nine. The men were believed to belong to the Pak Taliban, one of the country's largest and deadliest thug groups.

Later, missiles hit a compound in Speen Darang village where the Lashkar-e-Islam, a Taliban affiliate known to be strong in Khyber, were meeting, killing 32 people, among them commanders. The third strike took place in Narai Baba village and killed 15 Islamic exemplars, the officials said.

US officials do not acknowledge firing the missiles, much less comment on who they are targeting. It is impossible to independently report on the aftermath of the attacks because outsiders are not allowed to visit the tribal regions.

Human rights groups say there are significant numbers of civilian casualties in the attacks.
Posted by:Fred

#7  Especially journalists that should know better

they do - they're on the other side
Posted by: Frank G   2010-12-18 16:31  

#6   US officials do not acknowledge firing the missiles, much less comment on who they are targeting. It is impossible to independently report on the aftermath of the attacks because outsiders are not allowed to visit the tribal regions.

Human rights groups say there are significant numbers of civilian casualties in the attacks.

And since "the human right's groups" can't visit the tribal areas either, their statement is based on what?

Pakistan cannot have it both ways. "The tribal regions are outside our [sovereign] control" and "Drone strikes in the tribal regions violate our sovereignty".

If they claim sovereignty in the tribal regions then stop the terrorist. Unless terrorism is the sovereign policy of the Pakistani government, in which case ....



THIS

Mike ramsey, you are on to something. These so called "human rights groups" they refer to are merely Al-Qaeda or Taliban mouthpieces.


Makes me wonder why so many people swallow propaganda whole, without questioning the source.

Especially journalists that should know better.
Posted by: Mikey Hunt   2010-12-18 16:26  

#5  It WaS a DOvoCHAK PROBLem NemNat

Ascii me anything maroon.
Posted by: Goldies Every Damn Where   2010-12-18 16:06  

#4  ILL SAY IT GREAT JOB OBAMA

Why was this so hard for GEORGE .W
Posted by: Play4Keeps   2010-12-18 14:15  

#3  The case, brought by a Pakistani journalist whose brother and son died in a drone strike last year

First guess would be brother & son were Tali terrorists and the lawfare waging journalist probably is too.
If not, then what were they doing hanging around Tali terrorists?
I hope Banks or his replacement has good surveillance on the guy.
Posted by: Glenmore   2010-12-18 08:32  

#2  US officials do not acknowledge firing the missiles, much less comment on who they are targeting. It is impossible to independently report on the aftermath of the attacks because outsiders are not allowed to visit the tribal regions.

Human rights groups say there are significant numbers of civilian casualties in the attacks.


And since "the human right's groups" can't visit the tribal areas either, their statement is based on what?

Pakistan cannot have it both ways. "The tribal regions are outside our [sovereign] control" and "Drone strikes in the tribal regions violate our sovereignty".

If they claim sovereignty in the tribal regions then stop the terrorist. Unless terrorism is the sovereign policy of the Pakistani government, in which case ....
Posted by: Mike Ramsey   2010-12-18 08:18  

#1  Update
The drone programme is controversial in Pakistan, where politicians blame the attacks for killing civilians, stoking anti-western feeling and driving young men into the arms of Taliban recruiters.

Such is the sensitivity that the US refuses to acknowledge the use of drones and the Pakistan government publicly denies it has allowed American spies to launch attacks on its soil.

On Friday it emerged that the CIA had smuggled its station chief out of Pakistan after his cover was blown when he was named in a lawsuit seeking compensation for deaths allegedly caused by a drone attack.

The case, brought by a Pakistani journalist whose brother and son died in a drone strike last year, blamed Jonathan Banks, the CIA's top spy in Pakistan, along with Leon Panetta, CIA director, and Robert Gates, the US defence secretary, for the deaths.

His name was published by local and international media covering the case. Demonstrators in the heart of the capital, Islamabad, have carried placards bearing the officer's name and urging him to leave the country.

The station chief in Islamabad operates as a secret general in the fight against al-Qaeda. He runs the Predator drone programme, handles some of the CIA's most urgent and sensitive tips and collaborates closely with Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence agency, one of the most important relationships in the spy world.

But in a rare move, Banks was summoned home on Thursday by the CIA, citing "security concerns".
Posted by: tipper   2010-12-18 02:28  

00:00