You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Science & Technology
Nissan delivers first electric car
2010-12-14
[Arab News] Japan's Nissan Motor Co. delivered the first mass-market all-electric car to a technology entrepreneur in Caliphornia on Saturday as the company tries to get a jump in the nascent green vehicle race.

The first customer, Olivier Chalouhi, has been riding an electric bicycle to work, and he plugged his new car in for the cameras outside San Francisco City Hall. The charge point, one of 400 in the region, had a green official city sign near it that said, "Green Vehicle Showcase: Cars that make a difference."

The Leaf is one of a handful of mass-market fully electric or extended range plug-in vehicles slated to reach consumers in the next year.

The battery-powered Leaf, with an EPA-certified battery-only range of 73 miles (120 km) is due to hit showrooms this month in a limited roll-out -- along with Chevy Volts by General Motors Co. Ford Motor Co. expects to deliver its first electric Focus compact cars late next year.

Carlos Taveras, the North American head of Nissan, said his company would focus on satisfying the first 20,000 Leaf customers before opening up for more orders next year.

"We are not in a rush," he told news hounds, reasserting Nissan's plan to go straight to zero-emission cars, as opposed to the Volt with its gasoline engine that can recharge the battery to give it more range.

Work at Nissan's Tennessee plant was under way to have production capacity for 100,000 battery packs by early 2013, Taveras said, though he told Rooters that was not an indication of expected demand for the car.

The Leaf and Volt are seen as the spearheads of the greening of automobiles. But gasoline and diesel-powered cars with better fuel economy are seen as having more immediate impact on lowering greenhouse gas, mainly because of their greater numbers.

Caliphornia, the most populous US state, is the biggest market for conventional cars and is expected to be the biggest one for electric vehicles as well. The fact the Leaf is eligible for the Caliphornia rebate, while the Volt is not, will be a selling point for Nissan.

The Leaf is also set to be delivered to Oregon, Seattle, Tennessee and Arizona, followed by Hawaii and Texas shortly after that.

As a pure electric car, the Leaf tops the Volt in the category on the EPA label that tracks greenhouse gas emissions from the vehicle. Since it carries no combustion engine, the Leaf has no such emissions, although greenhouse gases would be produced by the power plants used to recharge the car.

The Leaf will be priced at about $32,780 before a federal tax credit can bring the sticker price to about $25,280 and, in Caliphornia, a rebate that can reduce it to about $20,280.

Journalists named it the 2011 European Car of the Year, the first electric vehicle to be chosen for the award.

Chevy's Volt -- named Green Car of the Year and Motor Trend car of the year -- is rated at 84 grams of carbon dioxide per mile, less than one-tenth of the industry's worst-performing vehicle on that score.

The Volt is designed to run for 35 miles (56 km) on a full charge of its 400-pound (181-kg) lithium-ion battery pack supplied by a unit of Korea's LG Chem. After that, a 1.4-liter engine extends the driving range to about 379 miles (610 km).

GM plans to build 10,000 Volts next year, 45,000 in 2012 and has begun discussing ways it could increase the production should there be more demand.

Capturing the fuel-economy leadership from Toyota Motor Corp's hybrid Prius would give GM bragging rights it has sought throughout the Volt development effort.
Posted by:Fred

#14  "try to sell that to a enviro greenie weenie and see what happens: mouth frothing, eye bulging, shakes and hysteria"

Sounds entertaining. Can I bring popcorn? :-D
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2010-12-14 19:03  

#13  Chevy Volt. American Jobs. The GMCs made in China, stay in China, buy Chevrolet volt which will be made in USA. I think GMC just hired about 7000 American workers for this.
Posted by: Fire and Ice   2010-12-14 17:36  

#12  Who's paying for those "charge points"? This loon, or me?
Posted by: mojo   2010-12-14 17:29  

#11  I still do not know why no major manufacturer has come out with a diesel electric motor and direct electric drive. Submarines have been doing that for decades. It would be seriously efficient, and a well tuned diesel running at constant speed (the engine providing charge and electrical current, not the car) the pollution would probably be far lower than the equivalent conventional drive gas or diesel engine.

Because the air pollution control laws in CA (which are now, thanks to the Zero Administration, the air pollution control laws for the nation) are seriously biased against diesel vehicles. Since the combustion happens at a higher temperature, it basically means that there's a higher chance that nitrogen compounds will be formed.

(Oh, and since then, CA has been taking an even harder line against diesel engines, because they also produce soot; they want to make them cost-prohibitive to use for things like forklifts and over-the-road trucking).

(Ain't it funny how stopping CO2 emmissions is important to these people until basically suddenly it isn't?)
Posted by: Thing From Snowy Mountain   2010-12-14 15:45  

#10  try to sell that to a enviro greenie weenie and see what happens: mouth frothing, eye bulging, shakes and hysteria

Tempting.

Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2010-12-14 15:11  

#9  Hey 746, we know that all vehicles are remote and not remote; my comment addresses the mis-statement in the press release quoted in the article. On behalf of all the 'Burgers, allow me to apologize for our obvious lack of in depth knowledge that you seem to bring an all fronts.
thanks for playing.
Posted by: USN, Ret.   2010-12-14 15:08  

#8  The design I was referring to was the diesel electric motor.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2010-12-14 14:04  

#7  That's the design we've been using in our locomotives for the last 50+ years. It's not made it in the individual vehicle market due to noise, exhaust and operating time, I'd suspect. Why it is not used in trucks is an interesting question. You would think trucking companies would be enthusiastic about the design if it were economically efficient.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2010-12-14 14:03  

#6  has been riding an electric bicycle to work

I used to ride a bicycle to work in San Francisco - and I, you know, just peddled it. No electric motor necessary. That's the funny thing about bicycles...
Posted by: Secret Master   2010-12-14 14:00  

#5  Actually they could claim to be "emissions free" if they drew power exclusively from nuclear or hydroelectric plants. You know, the generation plants that the Greens block with lawsuits.

I still do not know why no major manufacturer has come out with a diesel electric motor and direct electric drive. Submarines have been doing that for decades. It would be seriously efficient, and a well tuned diesel running at constant speed (the engine providing charge and electrical current, not the car) the pollution would probably be far lower than the equivalent conventional drive gas or diesel engine.
Posted by: OldSpook   2010-12-14 12:51  

#4  Its not pollution if its energy from Utah or Kansas, its what they deserve.

Now, are we going to have to add sound makers a la Houston Light Rail so that people don't start walking out in front of these fancy electric vehicles, and what does having the AC unit and fan do to the maximum expected range, or for that matter driving in mountains or I-40, and with the heater on? How long does that charge last if you are stuck in traffic...yes yes the battery is not engaged because it is electric blah blah bullcrap. Lights, radio, windshield wipers, gps, cell phone charger all going while just sitting there, stop and go. I'm just going to go ahead and guess that in order to keep the weight down it will have a cage made of these new alloys which are too tough for traditional jaws of life to cut through.

$12,000 in government tax credits? OK, I see the niche for such vehicles but just admit it..it is a personal transport with a very narrow ability which would not be worth it if someone else were not picking up 1/3 of the tab but that is ok because if fosters your fancy snob tendancy to look down on others who point out the obvious. No I get it I really do, locals have retrofit golf carts into road legal in-town transport. Honestly I cannot wait for these vehicles to get into the market gonna be good times.
Posted by: swksvolFF   2010-12-14 10:21  

#3  Uh, hello..... ANY manufactured machine has remote emissions. A gasoline powered car has both remote and ( I suppose non-remote emissions ).
Posted by: 746   2010-12-14 09:59  

#2  Caliphornia, the most populous US state, is the biggest market for conventional cars and is expected to be the biggest one for electric vehicles as well.

Except Caliphornia is BROKE.
Posted by: Redneck Jim   2010-12-14 09:52  

#1  Think about this: The Leaf and other electric cars are not zero-emission vehicles despite the hype; they are remote emission vehicles. The power has to come from somewhere, the electron fairy just doens't pop in, slap the hood with her magic wand and "presto" a full charge. but try to sell that to a enviro greenie weenie and see what happens: mouth frothing, eye bulging, shakes and hysteria will greet you.
Posted by: USN,Ret   2010-12-14 00:42  

00:00