You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Afghanistan
Obama must talk to Afghan Taliban, experts say
2010-12-12
[Emirates 24/7] A group of influential international experts on Afghanistan Saturday appealed to US President Barack B.O. Obama to radically change his strategy in the war-ravaged nation and negotiate directly with the Taliban.

A huge US troop surge has failed to stem a worsening insurgency in Afghanistan, with 2010 proving to be a year of record violence.

The letter from 23 researchers, journalists and NGO chiefs comes just days before the White House publishes an evaluation of the US strategy.

Researchers Gilles Dorronsoro from La Belle France and Italian Antonio Giustozzi, as well as Pak journalist Ahmed Rashid, were among those who said the current strategy was failing as the Taliban, ousted from government by a US-led invasion in 2001, grew in strength.

A coalition government that includes the Taliban should be the long-term goal, they said.

"We ask you to sanction and support a direct dialogue and negotiation with the Afghan Taliban leadership residing in Pakistain," the experts said in their open letter.

"It is better to negotiate now rather than later, since the Taliban will likely be stronger next year."

"The situation on the ground is much worse than a year ago because the Taliban insurgency has made progress across the country," the letter said.

"The Taliban today are now a national movement with a serious presence in the north and the west of the country."

The experts said military operations in Kandahar and Helmand, provinces in the south hard hit by the insurgency, are not going well and had become "a full-scale military campaign causing civilian casualties and destruction of property.

"Due to the violence of the military operations, we are losing the battle for hearts and minds in the Pashtun countryside, with a direct effect on the sustainability of the war."

"The military campaign is suppressing, locally and temporarily, the symptoms of the disease, but fails to offer a cure," the group said, decrying the "huge" human and financial cost of the war.

The letter also says the 2014 deadline to put the Afghan army in command of security was unrealistic.
"Like it or not, the Taliban are a long-term part of the Afghan political landscape and we need to try and negotiate with them in order to reach a diplomatic settlement. The Taliban's leadership has indicated its willingness to negotiate and it is in our interests to talk to them."

Since taking office, Obama has ordered more than 50,000 extra troops into battle to reverse Taliban momentum and build up Afghan government forces so that combat troops can start leaving in 2011.
There are more than 140,000 US-led NATO troops on the ground -- two-thirds of them American.

But the increased numbers has also seen more troops killed this year than ever before, with more than 680 foreign soldiers dead so far in 2010 and the tally mounting almost daily.

Afghanistan's Caped President Hamid Maybe I'll join the Taliban Karzai has made overtures to the Taliban and other bully boyz to negotiate an end to the war, but that was "not enough", the experts said.

"The United States must take the initiative to start negotiations with the bully boyz and frame the discussion in such a way that American security interests are taken into account," they said.
Posted by:Fred

#8  "23 researchers, journalists and NGO chiefs"

And we should take anything you worthless clowns say, why exactly?

It's not like any of you have actually accomplished anything worthwhile.
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2010-12-12 18:40  

#7  Bill Clinton willing to go to Afghanistan?

Oooooh ouch, g(r)omgoru. Think how even more fun could be had by all, were they to send the vice president instead (that's Joe Biden, in case you forgot, distracted by more important things, like butterflies). ;-)

Any time experts say "must", we know what isn't going to happen, anyway.
Posted by: trailing wife   2010-12-12 18:34  

#6  Bill Clinton willing to go to Afghanistan?
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2010-12-12 10:22  

#5  From Rantburg's "Latest News from the Out-to-Lunch Bunch" section.
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418   2010-12-12 08:53  

#4  Why not just tnank them for 9-11? Everything is leading to re-talibanization. Wonder why?
Posted by: Hupuper Panda6835   2010-12-12 06:49  

#3  
"These demands are not open to negotiation or discussion. The Taliban must act, and act immediately. They will hand over the terrorists, or they will share in their fate."
George W. Bush, Statement To Joint Session Of Congress September 20th 2001


A little reminder for the 'experts' re the historical context of the Afghanistan war.
Posted by: Omaing White7048   2010-12-12 05:32  

#2  "Due to the violence of the military operations, we are losing the battle for hearts and minds in the Pashtun countryside, with a direct effect on the sustainability of the war."

There it is again, the infamous "We."
Posted by: Besoeker   2010-12-12 04:20  

#1  I like it better when "experts" are "baffled"...
Posted by: tu3031   2010-12-12 00:11  

00:00