You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
International-UN-NGOs
IPCC Expert admits UN goal is Wealth Redistribution
2010-11-19
One need read no further than the U.N. International Climate Accord [PDF] ultimately shot down at CopenhagenÂ’s climate summit last year to understand the organizationÂ’s international wealth redistribution goals. The failed treaty actually contained as many paragraphs outlining the payment of "climate debt" reparations by Western nations as it did emission reduction schemes.

Indeed, for nearly 50-years the U.N. has formulated its own unique brand of “social justice” under the guise of “saving the planet” by demonizing one byproduct of Western economic growth or another. Carbon Dioxide is, of course, merely the devil’s derivative du jour.

Now, a high-ranking member of the U.NÂ’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has admitted that climate policy has little to do with environmental protection.

On Sunday, Ottmar Edenhofer, a German economist and IPCC Co-chair of Working Group III on Mitigation of Climate Change, told the Neue Zürcher Zeitung (translated) that “climate policy is redistributing the world's wealth” and that “it's a big mistake to discuss climate policy separately from the major themes of globalization.”

Edenhofer went on to explain that in Cancun, the redistribution of not only wealth but also natural resources will be negotiated, adding that:

The climate summit in Cancun at the end of the month is not a climate conference, but one of the largest economic conferences since the Second World War.

And another shot at playing Robin Hood with AmericansÂ’ money. As I addressed yesterday:

Now consider the U.N. plan to levy a climate reparations tax on the developed world (read that United States) on everything from airline flights and international shipping to fuel and financial transactions to the tune of $100 billion annually. That scheme is backed by both Obama advisor Lawrence Summers and radical anti-American billionaire George Soros as a means to meet the annual figure “international leaders” agreed to in Copenhagen and will be a primary goal at Cancun in a few weeks.

Will Barack Obama and his fellow recently repudiated Democrats actually entertain incurring further international debt on the backs of strapped American taxpayers (whose belief in AGW is at an all-time low), given EdenhoferÂ’s staggering affirmation?

Stay tuned.
Posted by:tipper

#7  Hey, Joe. I met a Sailor last year who was being deployed to Guam. I told her to contact you. Hope she did.
Posted by: Deacon Blues   2010-11-19 21:45  

#6  IPCC + UNO

versies

* WND > UNVEILED: CONSTITUTION FOR NEW SOCIALIST NORTH AMERICA ["New Socialist Republic" in NORAM], brought to you by your friendly neighborhood Motherly REVOLUTIONARY COMMUNIST PARTY, USA.

COMMIE JIHAD + ARMED REVOLUTION + GOVT OVERTHROW, etc. MAY BE NECESSARY TO PROTECT AMERIKA [OWG MIGHTY USSA = OWG WEAK USRoA Global SSR] FROM AMERICA.

D *** NG IT, SUPPORT THE AMERIKAN = AMIS-SHEVIK REVOLUTION OR NO SEXY SLINKY "PIRANHA 3D" BIKINI BABES-ON-A-BOAT ANGLE PHOTOS/POSTERS FOR YOU, MY FRIEND!

But, once again I digress ...
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2010-11-19 21:33  

#5  The UN cretins what to redistribute your wealth into their pockets. The poor of the world can buzz off.
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2010-11-19 20:57  

#4  But you cannot redistribute wealth. You only destroy it when you try, and make the poor, poorer whilst doing so.
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2010-11-19 19:33  

#3  Once again: UN delenda est
Posted by: Spot   2010-11-19 08:25  

#2  A VERY interesting interview in the Neue Zürcher Zeitung.

Here's the link (Google translate in Tiny URL)

http://tinyurl.com/2ftehsk

Posted by: European Conservative   2010-11-19 03:10  

#1  Bavarian hiking and ski trails, beer, schnitzel.... all good. Bavarian social scientists, economists, and environmentalists not so much.
Posted by: Besoeker   2010-11-19 02:01  

00:00