You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Obama may extend tax cuts for rich
2010-11-13
The B.O. regime has signaled that a pending agreement could extend a Bush-era tax cut that benefits high-income Americans.
Benefits all Americans. If one is really a Keynesian, one doesn't raise taxes on anybody when the economy is in the dumper ...
President Barack B.O. Obama's senior adviser David Axelrod said the agreement would be the only way to ensure that lower tax rates for middle-income Americans continue.

In an interview with the Huffington Post earlier this week, Axelrod emphasized that Obama did not want to "trade away security for the middle class."

Separately, White House Spokesman Amy Brundage voiced concerns over the prospect of making the high-income tax cuts permanent, saying that Obama was trying to broker a deal with congressional leaders.

"He (Obama) has also expressed concern about the cost of making the highest-income tax cuts permanent and is looking forward to discussing this and other issues with bipartisan congressional leaders next week," Bloomberg quoted Brundage as saying.

Obama has previously stated that he supports extending tax cuts for Americans, but not for those who make more than $200,000 annually or couples making more than $250,000 a year.

The US president argues that an extension of tax cuts for high-income Americans would cost the government $700 billion in lost revenue.

An official report released by the US Census Bureau last month showed that the top earning 20 percent of Americans received 49.4 percent of all income generated in the US.

This is while the lowest earning 20 percent of Americans received a mere 3.4 percent of the nation's income.

According to the census in 2009, 43.6 million people were below the poverty line, up from 39.8 million in 2008.
Posted by:Fred

#7  If the tax rates go up, will the SOB's in the media call them the Obama Tax Increases?
Posted by: remoteman   2010-11-13 19:22  

#6  This is THE Best thing that can be done for those on low wages (as they are employed by those on higher wages and now there's more wages).
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2010-11-13 10:55  

#5  I know it's all symantics but after a decade it's the "tax rate" not a "tax cut". And BTW, how did they choose an arbitrary number of $250K as a classification for "wealthy"?
Posted by: DepotGuy   2010-11-13 08:58  

#4  After the Fed induced inflation takes hold, we'll all be in what is presently the numerical definition of 'rich'. Just not a whole lot of 'value' behind the numbers. It's called bracket creep. In this case, more of soaring than creeping.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2010-11-13 08:51  

#3  So President Socialism and his Journolist Enablers ignore the small businesses (i.e. Joe The Plumber) who pull less than $1M with an employee or three. They are 'the rich.'
Posted by: Free Radical   2010-11-13 06:35  

#2  Devalue the dollar by 50% and tax cuts for the rich will be a moot point. The only problems will be along the lines of $7/gal gasoline and $160/barrel to import our oil.
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418   2010-11-13 02:36  

#1  He's into redistribution. He'll fight for taxing the rich until the bitter end.
Posted by: gorb   2010-11-13 01:16  

00:00