| Submit your comments on this article | |
| Home Front: Culture Wars | |
| San Francisco mayor candidate: it's Asians fault for provoking Blacks to attack | |
| 2010-10-25 | |
| Politically involved San Franciscans received an introduction to one Harold Miller last week, when the heretofore unknown mayoral candidate sent out a mass e-mail illuminating how he'd run our fair city. When the unemployed cabbie and president of the Sunnydale Tenants Association rails against the "crazy laws the Board of Supervisors put on the books" or admits he wants "anyone in LOVE to marry," it's hard to imagine many registered San Francisco voters disagreeing with him. That's not the case when he trots out his novel approach to combating black-on-Asian violence. "I have been trying to set-up a meeting with Ms Rose Pak of the Asian community to teach her people to look Blacks in the eye as a sign of respect, which is all the young kids who are doing these attacks say they want," he wrote. Appeasement: has it ever not worked? Faulting the Asian Muni passengers beaten and killed along the Third Street corridor for their own misfortunes is an unusual thing to do -- even if you aren't running for elected office. Miller tells SF Weekly, however, that he's not excusing this behavior. "It's one of the reasons that black people are so angry at the Chinese. They disrespect them by looking at their feet or away from them," he says. "You're talking about young guys and their attitude. ... If you disrespect them, they're going to mug you. Just ignore them and get the hell out of there. They are looking for trouble." For some reason, he notes, Chinatown power broker Pak hasn't returned his messages. Funny, I thought if you looked a thug in the eye, he took it as a challenge.
| |
| Posted by:gromky |
| #10 Liberal answer to P2k's stats remains more and younger sexual education; allowing the word "family" to have a host of meanings; denial of promiscuity as a negative trait via MSM praisings of Lady Gaga and such; denial of any form of sexuality as "deviant"; denial of the appearance of generational criminals; and denial of the spillover phenomena of grandmothers raising grandchildren from the African-American to the Latino Community (and probably soon to the white community). I speak as a longtime teacher and observer of humankind. |
| Posted by: borgboy 2010-10-25 17:57 |
| #9 Yes, Procopius; I am showing my age. " Huh..families?" |
| Posted by: Dale 2010-10-25 15:41 |
| #8 P2K, Sorry my cranial density was so high this morning. |
| Posted by: Nimble Spemble 2010-10-25 15:24 |
| #7 "I have been in talks with the N.F.L. about starting a new San Francisco 49er team" Suurrrre you have, bub. * NFL head office secretary: "Commissioner, that nutcase from San Fran is on the line again...." * |
| Posted by: Barbara Skolaut 2010-10-25 14:53 |
| #6 Just look at Table 9 Nonmarital childbearing, and the sublisting under 'Percentage of live births to unwed mothers'. Observe the expansion from 1970 to 2006. What families? |
| Posted by: Procopius2k 2010-10-25 12:07 |
| #5 P2K, Which one of the 574 pages was I supposed to look at? |
| Posted by: Nimble Spemble 2010-10-25 10:40 |
| #4 Huh..families? |
| Posted by: Procopius2k 2010-10-25 09:58 |
| #3 From the article: "Perhaps Miller's grandest plan, however, is letting the door hit the San Francisco 49ers on the ass as they move out of the city, and starting up an expansion franchise. "I have been in talks with the N.F.L. about starting a new San Francisco 49er team and the name of the team will be the 'San Francisco 1849ers,'" he wrote in his mass e-mail. "The city will own the team and the franchises and when ever I get Jerry Rice's phone number I will be giving him a call and all of the so-called retired 49ers will get back their jobs." This, he says, will flood the city's coffers with so much dinero we won't even have to worry about pension reform." Yeah, that'll go over well. The guy is a nut and a fool and a racist. |
| Posted by: rjschwarz 2010-10-25 09:58 |
| #2 Look at your prisons. Each group associates with their own. Same is happening in our schools and cities. Then in the world as well. I don't see the racial harmony with any group when blacks control government or a community. I have worked with people different language and race backgrounds and this conflict is very old. Spanish are not Latin,and Puerto Ricans are not Africans. The next group would have to be Asians "Not all of them, but allot". I speak of this from working with many different peoples. We are talking here of percentages. There are many that do commingle well but things are out of wack now. Examples; vote as a block, minority set asset-asides(even when they are not the minority), attack those that are perceived to have more than themselves (everyone is fair game on that one), finally change laws to fit their contemporary mindset. Hence the Constitution can be updated. I am convinced the school educational system is driving this not families. |
| Posted by: Dale 2010-10-25 09:38 |
| #1 Well Asians are kinda cultural racist towards anyone ,not all of them, but alot. Not too mention I'm sure alot of those blacks they are talking about more than deserve an asswhooping. |
| Posted by: chris 2010-10-25 08:53 |