You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
EPA comes down on States without "adequate" greenhouse gas implementation plans
2010-09-09
As of Thursday, Sept. 2, 2010, no state is going to get out of federal regulation of greenhouse gases (GHGs) through the Clean Air Act, thanks to a two-pronged attack this week by the federal EPA on 13 states not toeing the line.
Your friendly Federal Government and its heavy handed way of enforcing regulations that are of questionable need. This is not about the environment, but rather of an agency making policy because Congress shirks its responsibilities and leaves regulations to an entity out of control and not accountable to anyone. This is a power play by the Federal Government
In Thursday's Federal Register, the EPA printed its previously announced intention to create a federal implementation plan (FIP) for any state that does not submit a plan the agency finds acceptable. The rule would make sure that every state has the power, will and legal requirement to issue permits under the Clean Air Act's New Source Review Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) program for sources of GHGs.

The proposal is a companion the agency's' rulemaking last week entitled Action to Ensure Authority to Issue Permits Under the Prevention of Significant Deterioration Program to Sources of Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Finding of Substantial Inadequacy and SIP Call, which was signed and published on the same schedule. In that action, the agency proposed to make a finding of substantial inadequacy and proposed to issue an SIP call for 13 states on grounds that their SIPs would not apply the PSD program to GHGs. Alaska, much of Arizona, Arkansas, parts of California, Connecticut, Florida, Idaho, Kansas, Kentucky, Nebraska, part of Nevada, Oregon and Texas had their GHG implementation plans found wanting by the federal agency.

Comments must be received on or before Oct. 4, 2010. Read the notice at http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2010/2010-21706.htm.

SOURCE: Federal Register
"We are here to issue orders, not to take requests."
Posted by:Alaska Paul

#10  Move 'em to Pluto. Then burn the spaceships.
Posted by: DarthVader   2010-09-09 23:16  

#9  ...hmmmm...Attu.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2010-09-09 22:22  

#8  Western Modem - close. Build a quonset hut in the "pristine wilderness" of Alaska's north slope. That can be the new EPA HQ. Heating optional (wouldn't want to increase "carbon footprint").
Posted by: DMFD   2010-09-09 21:46  

#7  Government bureaucracies like the EPA need to be moved over 600 miles every decade with no moving allowance for the bureaucrats. If they want to go they must believe in the job so can keep it. Otherwise, the bureaucracy hires from a different labor pool in a new place.
Posted by: Water Modem   2010-09-09 17:35  

#6  Amen, P2K, Amen. Starve the beast. See how many of the zealots are willing to work "pro bono".
Posted by: rwv   2010-09-09 16:56  

#5  One of the first bureaucracies not to get funding in the next Congress.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2010-09-09 14:42  

#4  I'd rather see A Desert Called Peace.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2010-09-09 14:24  

#3  The more I see the news, the more I see Tom Kratman's A State of Disobedience. Especially with the EPA.
Posted by: miscellaneous   2010-09-09 14:17  

#2  Oh, and one thing I noticed reading the lists of states.

All those states have dhimocrat congressmen fighting for their political lives. Either Bambi and his ilk are dumb as hell, or have accepted that the dhimocrats will not win in those states and are working to "punish" the voters.
Posted by: DarthVader   2010-09-09 13:44  

#1  The EPA needs to be put down like the rabid dog it is.
Posted by: DarthVader   2010-09-09 13:42  

00:00