| Submit your comments on this article | ||
| -Lurid Crime Tales- | ||
| When is a hate crime, NOT a hate crime? | ||
| 2010-09-08 | ||
| ||
| Posted by:anymouse |
| #14 "Where are AL Sharpton or Jesse Jackson speaking out. Or are they only concerned with one race?" Well, duh. Actually, the only color those race hustlers care about is green - as much as possible extorted from people into their own pockets. >:-( |
| Posted by: Barbara Skolaut 2010-09-08 23:07 |
| #13 well, could you make the claim that a culture that belittles education in the modern era is a stupid culture or would that be racist? |
| Posted by: Broadhead6 2010-09-08 22:37 |
| #12 ..in 92 there were still Koreans alive who'd been real slaves. Not someone's ancestor generations removed, but living people who could bear witness to that evil institution. The Korean community couldn't be co-opted by the guilt game which infuriated the hustlers. |
| Posted by: Procopius2k 2010-09-08 22:37 |
| #11 look at the response to the 2001 riots in Cincinnati, and the less-reported violence that followed Ask the Koreans in L.A. about 1992... |
| Posted by: Pappy 2010-09-08 22:29 |
| #10 anon1 that is racist. It is not pigmentation, it is CULTURE. Asian culture expect achievement, black culture belittles it. |
| Posted by: No I am The Other Beldar 2010-09-08 19:50 |
| #9 yup that's a racist hate crime all right. Blacks hating Asians, maybe because... asians are smarter. Sorry it's a racist stereotype but it's just true. Look at any school you will see asians are disproportionately high achievers. this school is 70% black, 18% Asian - and my guess is those 18% are almost all in the top quartile. it's jealousy |
| Posted by: anon1 2010-09-08 15:48 |
| #8 I noticed when applying for an Oakland City job that Asians are not giving any points on the application. They may get a few points down the road if they can demonstrate fluency in Mandarin, depending on the position, but no more than 3 pts. I was a little surprised to be honest, but I guess they don't need the extra points, same as me. |
| Posted by: bigjim-CA 2010-09-08 13:40 |
| #7 It’s become so ridiculous that students from SE Asia are often no longer considered “minorities” when it comes to testing scores. (Even though they meet that classification in every measurable criterion.) However their performance has excelled to match the traditional privileged class. (Whitey) And well, that just mucks up that whole minority “achievement gap” funding. That's kind of scary because I've had similar thoughts. The fact is, they are a minority. They just aren't the current favorite one at the moment. They're too successful, there fore, there must be discrimination. |
| Posted by: miscellaneous 2010-09-08 12:31 |
| #6 Ahh…behold the wisdom of Multi-Culturalism. In order for such a scheme to perpetuate there must always be victims and oppressors. But what to do when the former becomes the latter? Well, the victims will always remain victims. So the Multi-Culti solution is to empathize with their once chosen victim in hopes that they will, in turn, identify with the most recent class of oppressed. Or as one of the educators is quoted in the article: "Those (black) kids feel the majority of the staff there does not care about their education," Smith says. "They see these Asian kids come in and be nurtured, and they want that same kind of comfort." And as the new School Principal clearly states. "Part of it is getting people to see the human side in every person, identifying with their struggle.” It’s become so ridiculous that students from SE Asia are often no longer considered “minorities” when it comes to testing scores. (Even though they meet that classification in every measurable criterion.) However their performance has excelled to match the traditional privileged class. (Whitey) And well, that just mucks up that whole minority “achievement gap” funding. |
| Posted by: DepotGuy 2010-09-08 11:38 |
| #5 no mo uro -- look at the response to the 2001 riots in Cincinnati, and the less-reported violence that followed. Blacks could pull a white woman out of her car, beat her, and the only way it even got reported was being mentioned in passing by local talk show hosts. The "justifications" for the riot were that the Cincinnati police were "murdering young black men". But when you looked at the cited cases, you found only three or four of the 16 that weren't obvious self-defense or defense of others -- and in the exceptional cases, the officers were prosecuted. Heck, one of the "murdered young black men" had climbed into a police car in order to murder the officer driving it! And, to me the most stunning example of the lefts' willingness to condone black violence was when the head of the Cincy police union held a press conference shortly after the riots. CNN joined, apparently expecting fireworks from a guy the locals had told them was a hothead. Instead, he started calmly reading the particulars of the cases used to excuse the riots. CNN suddenly had satellite trouble, and had to cut away from the press conference... |
| Posted by: Rob Crawford 2010-09-08 09:59 |
| #4 certain students' warped "gangster" values A house cleaning of the "gansta" culture needs to occur. Ooops. Saying this would probably be a hate crime. Just don't ask questions. The DOJ will decide such esoteric issues! They will take it up after they get done with Arizona. |
| Posted by: JohnQC 2010-09-08 09:33 |
| #3 Back in the mid 80s they had school violence in a Indianapolis facility. The parents got nothing from the administrators. Someone got smart and they organized and backed a new DA for the area. Elected he formed a grand jury which reviewed testimony and evidence. They indicted the principle and assistant principles who pleaded out on obstruction charges, to include out of their jobs with a conviction record. Downtown got the message and started to get back to discipline and security within the facilities across the city. |
| Posted by: Procopius2k 2010-09-08 09:18 |
| #2 #1 "Hate crime" laws will never be used by the authorities against blacks commiting what are dictionary-definition hate crimes, for two reasons: 1. Fear of reprisal against police departments, attorneys-general, and local/state governments, both on a physical level and by the use of the MSM and NPR/PBS by race arsonists like Sharpton and Jackson to extort law enforcement and try and ruin their lives. See DoJ, Black Panther Voter Intimidation for a case in point. |
| Posted by: miscellaneous 2010-09-08 06:34 |
| #1 "Hate crime" laws will never be used by the authorities against blacks commiting what are dictionary-definition hate crimes, for two reasons: 1. Fear of reprisal against police departments, attorneys-general, and local/state governments, both on a physical level and by the use of the MSM and NPR/PBS by race arsonists like Sharpton and Jackson to extort law enforcement and try and ruin their lives. 2. The cultural elite, particularly those who went to college during the height of the PC/multiculti/diversity/cultural Marxist era, are actually joyful when blacks act violently towards non-blacks, knowing in their hearts that this is just retribution for past wrongs. Don't believe me? Look at their response to 9/11, where they seized onto the notion that America deserved the attacks. |
| Posted by: no mo uro 2010-09-08 05:55 |