You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
India-Pakistan
Will America's flood aid win Pakistan's hearts and minds?
2010-08-30
[Pak Daily Times] US aid pouring into Pakistan's flood-hit regions is helping reverse widespread anti-American sentiment but will not be enough to win hearts and minds in the long term, experts say.

The US has been the biggest and the quickest single international floods donor, committing $200 million to help its ally in the fight against terrorism to recover from its worst-ever natural disaster. The US currently has 22 helicopters rescuing stranded villagers and ferrying relief supplies around the country, with four more on the way, said US embassy spokesman Richard Snelsire. The superpower has been involved in every area of the relief effort, spending its millions mostly through the UN, and international and local charity channels, to supply tonnes of food, water, shelter and medicine. $50 million have already been diverted from a $7.5 billion aid package approved by the US Congress last year in a bid to deepen ties with the South Asian nuclear power, a key partner in the fight against the Taliban and al Qaeda-linked terrorists. Victims are grateful for the help but many Pakistanis think it ironic that while the US is sending tonnes of aid, it is also sending drones to bomb terrorist hideouts in the border areas with Afghanistan.
Our culture finds the combination of carrot and stick more effective -- rewarding good behaviour and punishing bad.
And the gratitude may be short-lived, just as it was after a swell of support from America following Pakistan's 2005 earthquake that left 73,000 dead, said Pakistan analyst Rahimullah Yusufzai. "There will be goodwill created, it's already happening for America and it also happened in October 2005 during the earthquake... but that was for a short while and this is again the fear that it may not last long," said Yusufzai. "Aid must happen on a long-term basis," he said.
Aid has been happening on a long term basis. Decades, actually. Y'all just assume you're entitled to a tax on American income, and refuse to be grateful.
"There's a changing perception about America but not on such a big scale right now because at the same time America's helping out they are also bombing Pakistan territory".
Fix your jihadi problem and we won't have to do it for you.
During a visit to Pakistan's devastated submerged regions last week, head of aid agency USAID Rajiv Shah sought to assure officials that the US would keep a commitment to help Pakistan in the long term. But touring Sukkur, once a thriving semi-industrial trading post -- now reduced to a city of tarpaulin tents providing thin respite from the heat for thousands of families, the scale of the challenge was clear. "This is going to be very, very difficult, this is a huge-scale disaster," said Shah. "But we have to continue to be optimistic and look for those opportunities to help Pakistan to use this to build back better". The floods have already forced the US to rethink its spending in Pakistan, after announcing in July a series of water, energy and healthcare projects to improve the country's dire infrastructure. The floodwaters have wiped out part of Pakistan's most fertile agricultural land, damaged roads, bridges, power stations, electricity facilities, hospitals, schools, homes and left millions hungry, setting back longer-term development goals.
Posted by:Fred

#8  Cut off the aid and maybe they will figure out how to survive and be productive. Too many of them have far too much free time if they have enough time left for mischief, hi-jinks, terrorism and jihad. Besides, the money could be used in the U.S. to resurrect our economy. It's not appreciated over there--it only breeds seething and resentment.
Posted by: JohnQC   2010-08-30 14:17  

#7  Pakistan is just a larger version of gaza ie dependent on oversea aid to survive.
Posted by: Flavins Forkbeard5719   2010-08-30 13:09  

#6  I thought Islam was the Arabic word for ungrateful, unworthy and uncivilized. Why should we expect anything more.

No oil in Pakistan. When we're done with Afghanistan I think Pakistan might find themselves ignored, like Somalia, and not particularly happy about it.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2010-08-30 10:13  

#5  What Bulldog said. Dependence breeds resentment. Especially when the billions are routinely stolen by a Pakistani elite that's among the most corrupt on the planet-- including the supposedly sophisticated, western-educated Pakistani leaders like "Pinky" Bhutto.
Posted by: lex   2010-08-30 09:43  

#4  bulldog i like your reply

i think it needs a tweak though

all aid should cease to be replaced with... nothing.

Pakistan doesn't need your money they can get all they want from the Saudis. Fred needs your money he is being sued and Rantburg is in danger. Donate to Rantburg instead!!
Posted by: anon1   2010-08-30 09:27  

#3  No.

Next question!
Posted by: gromky   2010-08-30 08:12  

#2  What a bloody stupid question.

The Muslim world will never be grateful for anything the US does, or has done, to help them. It's the dependent adolescent syndrome, made worse by the fact that the Islamic world has been around a whole lot longer. All aid should stop, to be replaced with loans.
Posted by: Bulldog   2010-08-30 07:43  

#1  Of course not. We are infidels, and any payment to a Muslim country is just their due.
Besides, we caused the floods.
Posted by: Rambler in Virginia   2010-08-30 00:35  

00:00